Audit Lowe Down – Current / non-current liability classification

Lowe Lippmann Chartered Accountants

In the previous blog, we discussed the new standards in place for 31 December 2024, however the current / non-current classification changes deserve a bit more attention.


The revised AASB 101 Presentation of Financial Statements introduces a slightly amended definition of current liabilities and additional guidance around matters such as breaches of covenants, waivers and periods of grace.

Entities should consider the timing of testing of bank covenants since if they are tested:

  • On or before the reporting date – compliance with the covenants is considered in presenting the liability as current or non-current
  • After the reporting date – they are not considered as part of the current / non-current classification.


For example, an entity has a covenant which is tested annually at 31 January 2025, but they do not consider the existence of any potential breach of this covenant when classifying the liability for their 31 December 2024 financials since the testing date is after the reporting period.


However, additional disclosures are now required where an entity is required to give information about the existence of covenants, including facts and circumstances that indicate the entity may have difficulty complying with the covenant.


In the example above, if the entity considered that they may breach the January covenants due to current trading results, then this information would be disclosed in the 31 December 2024 financial statements.


Further disclosures in this example would depend on whether an actual breach occurred:

  • If breach occurred but going concern basis was still appropriate, then this would be disclosed as a non-adjusting event after the reporting date
  • If breach occurred and going concern was no longer appropriate, then the financial statements for 31 December 2024 would be prepared on a non-going concern basis
  • If no breach occurred, then a disclosure would be useful to clarify if facts and circumstances about a potential breach were included.


If an entity receives a waiver or period of grace in relation to a breached covenant, then this should be received by the borrower prior to the reporting period for it to be useful for the financial statements.


Entities should carefully review their loan agreements and covenants, to ensure accurate classification of liabilities under the new guidance since action may need to be taken prior to the end of the reporting period.


Please do not hesitate to contact your Lowe Lippmann Relationship Partner if you wish to discuss any of these matters further.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation


Audit Lowe Down – Costs incurred in acquiring / forming a business

September 9, 2025
Costs incurred in acquiring / forming a business. Further to the recent blog about capitalisation of costs when acquiring an asset, we have received a number of questions in relation to costs incurred in setting up / purchasing a business. Formation costs on establishing a business: These costs would include: Incorporation fees ASIC registration fees Legal fees Business name registration Pre-operating costs Pre-opening costs. The relevant standard for these costs is AASB 138 Intangible Assets and paragraph 69a confirms that these start-up costs are expensed when incurred. There is no identifiable asset controlled by the entity when the costs are incurred as the entity does not exist. Business acquisition costs These costs would include: Legal and accounting fees Due diligence and valuation costs Stamp duty Advisory or brokerage fees Project management costs related to the acquisition Internal costs allocated to the transaction In contrast to the asset acquisition discussed previously, AASB 3 Business Combinations requires all acquisition costs to be expensed as incurred. This means that they are not included as part of the consideration paid and therefore do not affect calculated goodwill.  Entities purchasing businesses should be aware that these costs are not able to be capitalised as they can often be substantial, and purchasers often do not expect the costs to be taken directly to the income statement

Practice Update – September 2025

September 8, 2025
ATO to include tax 'debts on hold' in taxpayer account balances From August 2025, the Australian Taxation Office ( ATO ) is progressively including 'debts on hold' in relevant taxpayer ATO account balances. A 'debt on hold' is an outstanding tax debt where the ATO has previously paused debt collection actions. Tax debts will generally be placed on hold where the ATO decides it is not cost effective to collect the debt at the time. The ATO is currently required by law to offset such 'debts on hold' against any refunds or credits the taxpayer is entitled to. The difficulty with these debts is that the ATO has not traditionally recorded them on taxpayer's ATO account balances. Taxpayers with 'debts on hold' of $100 or more will receive (or their tax agent will receive) a letter before it is added to their ATO account balance (which can be viewed in the ATO's online services or the statement of account). Taxpayers with a 'debt on hold' of less than $100 will not receive a letter, but the debt will be included in their ATO account balance. The ATO has advised it will remit the general interest charge ( GIC ) that is applied to 'debts on hold' for periods where they have not been included in account balances. This means that taxpayers have not been charged GIC for this period. The ATO will stop remitting GIC six months from the day the taxpayer's 'debt on hold' is included in their account balance. After this, GIC will start to apply.

Audit Lowe Down – How do we account for the costs incurred when acquiring an asset?

August 26, 2025
How do we account for the costs incurred when acquiring an asset? When we acquire an asset such as property, plant and equipment, intangibles or inventory there are often significant other costs incurred as part of the purchase process, including delivery, stamp duty, installation fees. Whether we capitalise these to the value of the asset or expense them as incurred can make a significant difference to an entity’s reported position or performance. Since we have accounting standards for specific assets, the treatment can vary depending on the asset and the relevant standard. A summary of some common expenses and their treatment under four accounting standards has been included below. The four standards considered are: AASB 102 Inventories AASB 116 Property, Plant and Equipment AASB 138 Intangible Assets AASB 140 Investment Property.
More Posts