Audit Lowe Down – Current / non-current liability classification

Lowe Lippmann Chartered Accountants

In the previous blog, we discussed the new standards in place for 31 December 2024, however the current / non-current classification changes deserve a bit more attention.


The revised AASB 101 Presentation of Financial Statements introduces a slightly amended definition of current liabilities and additional guidance around matters such as breaches of covenants, waivers and periods of grace.

Entities should consider the timing of testing of bank covenants since if they are tested:

  • On or before the reporting date – compliance with the covenants is considered in presenting the liability as current or non-current
  • After the reporting date – they are not considered as part of the current / non-current classification.


For example, an entity has a covenant which is tested annually at 31 January 2025, but they do not consider the existence of any potential breach of this covenant when classifying the liability for their 31 December 2024 financials since the testing date is after the reporting period.


However, additional disclosures are now required where an entity is required to give information about the existence of covenants, including facts and circumstances that indicate the entity may have difficulty complying with the covenant.


In the example above, if the entity considered that they may breach the January covenants due to current trading results, then this information would be disclosed in the 31 December 2024 financial statements.


Further disclosures in this example would depend on whether an actual breach occurred:

  • If breach occurred but going concern basis was still appropriate, then this would be disclosed as a non-adjusting event after the reporting date
  • If breach occurred and going concern was no longer appropriate, then the financial statements for 31 December 2024 would be prepared on a non-going concern basis
  • If no breach occurred, then a disclosure would be useful to clarify if facts and circumstances about a potential breach were included.


If an entity receives a waiver or period of grace in relation to a breached covenant, then this should be received by the borrower prior to the reporting period for it to be useful for the financial statements.


Entities should carefully review their loan agreements and covenants, to ensure accurate classification of liabilities under the new guidance since action may need to be taken prior to the end of the reporting period.


Please do not hesitate to contact your Lowe Lippmann Relationship Partner if you wish to discuss any of these matters further.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation


Tax Alert - Chalmers backs down on Superannuation reform

October 13, 2025
In response to continuing criticism and significant industry feedback, Treasurer Jim Chalmers has announced substantial revisions to the proposed Division 296 tax. The government has decided not to apply the tax to unrealised capital gains on members superannuation balances above $3 million. The removal of the proposed unrealised capital gains tax is undoubtedly a welcome change. Division 296 was initially set to take effect from 1 July 2025. The revised proposal, effective from 1 July 2026, still imposes an additional tax but now only on realised investment earnings on the portion of a super balance above $3 million at a 30 percent tax rate To recover some of the lost tax revenue, the Treasurer announced a new 40 percent tax rate on earnings for balances exceeding $10 million. It is also anticipated that both tax thresholds will be indexed in line with the Transfer Balance Cap. We will provide more details and guidance on the new proposal as they become available.

Practice Update – October 2025

October 3, 2025
ATO interest charges are no longer tax deductible – What you can do As we explained in our Practice Update for September, general interest charge ( GIC ) and shortfall interest charge ( SIC ) imposed by the ATO is no longer tax-deductible from 1 July 2025. This applies regardless of whether the underlying tax debt relates to past or future income years. With GIC currently at 11.17%, this is now one of the most expensive forms of finance in the market — and unlike in the past, you won’t get a deduction to offset the cost. For many taxpayers, this makes relying on an ATO payment plan a costly strategy. Refinancing ATO debt Businesses can sometimes refinance tax debts with a bank or other lender. Unlike GIC and SIC amounts, interest on these loans might be deductible for tax purposes, provided the borrowing is connected to business activities. While tax debts will sometimes relate to income tax or CGT liabilities, remember that interest could also be deductible where money is borrowed to pay other tax debts relating to a business, such as: GST; PAYG instalments; PAYG withholding for employees; and FBT. However, before taking any action to refinance ATO debt it is important to carefully consider whether you will be able to deduct the interest expenses or not. Individuals If you are an individual with a tax debt, the treatment of interest expenses incurred on a loan used to pay that tax debt really depends on the extent to which the tax debt arose from a business activity: Sole traders: If you are genuinely carrying on a business, interest on borrowings used to pay tax debts from that business is generally deductible. Employees or investors: If your tax debt relates to salary, wages, rental income, dividends, or other investment income, the interest is not deductible. Refinancing may still reduce overall interest costs depending on the interest rate on the new loan, but it won’t generate a tax deduction.

Audit Lowe Down – Costs incurred in acquiring / forming a business

September 9, 2025
Costs incurred in acquiring / forming a business. Further to the recent blog about capitalisation of costs when acquiring an asset, we have received a number of questions in relation to costs incurred in setting up / purchasing a business. Formation costs on establishing a business: These costs would include: Incorporation fees ASIC registration fees Legal fees Business name registration Pre-operating costs Pre-opening costs. The relevant standard for these costs is AASB 138 Intangible Assets and paragraph 69a confirms that these start-up costs are expensed when incurred. There is no identifiable asset controlled by the entity when the costs are incurred as the entity does not exist. Business acquisition costs These costs would include: Legal and accounting fees Due diligence and valuation costs Stamp duty Advisory or brokerage fees Project management costs related to the acquisition Internal costs allocated to the transaction In contrast to the asset acquisition discussed previously, AASB 3 Business Combinations requires all acquisition costs to be expensed as incurred. This means that they are not included as part of the consideration paid and therefore do not affect calculated goodwill.  Entities purchasing businesses should be aware that these costs are not able to be capitalised as they can often be substantial, and purchasers often do not expect the costs to be taken directly to the income statement
More Posts