Audit Lowe Down – Incorrect presentation of your liabilities could significantly affect your balance sheet
Lowe Lippmann Chartered Accountants
In a previous blog, we discussed the changes to the accounting standards relating to classification of current / non-current liabilities on the balance sheet.
We have been receiving a number of questions on this topic and have provided some practical scenarios below as well as some actions for you as we approach 30 June reporting dates.
| Scenario | Current / non-current | Actions for consideration |
|---|---|---|
| Borrowing facility is expiring within 12 months of the reporting date. | Current | Obtain written evidence from the bank prior to reporting date that the facility will be extended and the appropriate terms and conditions. |
| Breach of a bank covenant reported prior to year end but no response from financial institution at reporting date. | Current | Obtain written evidence from the bank prior to reporting date that the covenant breach is either subject to a period of grace of at least 12 months from the reporting date or is subject to a waiver. |
| Breach of a bank covenant as at reporting date reported to the financial institution after year end. | Current | No action possible if breach not reported until after reporting date since not possible to obtain waiver / period of grace prior to the reporting date. |
| Likely to breach a covenant after the year end. | n/a | Not assessed as part of current / non-current presentation but disclosure of existence of covenant and likely breach is required. Communicate with financial institution as soon as possible to include likely outcome (if waiver or period of grace) in the disclosure. |
Please do not hesitate to contact your Lowe Lippmann Relationship Partner if you wish to discuss any of these matters further.
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
Treasury announced new changes to Division 296 from 1 July 2026 During October the Treasurer announced some key changes to the proposed Division 296 tax measure to deal with some of the more contentious features of this proposed new tax. The Government is planning to make a number of significant changes to the way this tax will apply, including moving from a total superannuation balance change methodology to a fund-level realised-earnings approach and introducing a second threshold of $10 million, with CPI indexing applying to both thresholds. The Government also announced that the start date for the new Division 296 tax will be deferred to 1 July 2026 to allow further consultation and implementation work. For a full explanation of the announced new changes, see our Tax Alert ( click here ).
Further guidance on proposed changes to Division 296 from 1 July 2026 Earlier this week, we released a Tax Alert ( click here ) after the Government announced some significant changes to the proposed superannuation rules to increase the concessional tax rate from 15% to an effective 30% rate on earnings on total superannuation balances ( TSB ) over $3 million – known as Division 296. These proposed superannuation rules were set to commence on 1 July 2025, but the Government has now announced significant changes that will delay the start date until 1 July 2026 and apply to the 2026-27 financial year onwards.
In response to continuing criticism and significant industry feedback, Treasurer Jim Chalmers has announced substantial revisions to the proposed Division 296 tax. The government has decided not to apply the tax to unrealised capital gains on members superannuation balances above $3 million. The removal of the proposed unrealised capital gains tax is undoubtedly a welcome change. Division 296 was initially set to take effect from 1 July 2025. The revised proposal, effective from 1 July 2026, still imposes an additional tax but now only on realised investment earnings on the portion of a super balance above $3 million at a 30 percent tax rate To recover some of the lost tax revenue, the Treasurer announced a new 40 percent tax rate on earnings for balances exceeding $10 million. It is also anticipated that both tax thresholds will be indexed in line with the Transfer Balance Cap. We will provide more details and guidance on the new proposal as they become available.
