Tax Alert - Bonus 20% deduction for small business investment in skills and technology

Lowe Lippmann Chartered Accountants

Bonus 20% deduction for small business investment in skills and technology

Bonus 20% deduction for small business investment in skills and technology


The Government recently released draft legislation on the proposed small business boosts to provide tax incentives for small businesses to train and upskill their employees and improve their digital and technology capacity.


These incentives were originally announced by the previous Coalition Government as part of the Federal Budget 2022–23 and have now been released by the current Labor Government.


These incentives include two distinct components:

  • the small business skills and training boost (skills boost); and
  • the small business digital technology investment boost (technology boost).


The bonus 20% deduction for eligible expenditure under the skills boost and/or the technology boost will be available where a small business (with aggregated turnover less than $50 million) can satisfy the relevant eligibility criteria.


What is the skills boost?


The proposed skills boost will give eligible small businesses a bonus 20% deduction for eligible expenditure on external training provided to their employees.


The following eligibility criteria require that expenditure incurred on external training:

  • be delivered by registered providers to employees of the business;
  • must be within the scope of the registered provider’s registration at the time the expenditure is incurred;
  • provided either in person (with employees physically located in Australia) or online (where employees are not required to be physically located in Australia);
  • not provided by the small business claiming the bonus deduction or any of their associates;
  • not be on-the-job or in-house training;
  • not be for training persons who are not employees of a small business (ie. sole traders, individual partners in a partnership and independent contractors); and
  • be fully deductible under another provision of the tax law in the income year in which it is incurred.


The expenditure on external training can also include any associated costs such as books and equipment, but will not include fees charged by any entities not delivering the training sessions (ie. fees from an agent entity that helps connect businesses to training providers).


Registered providers of the external training sessions are required to be registered in Australia with at least one of four government authorities at the time the expenditure is incurred, including:

  • Australian Skills Quality Authority (or ASQA);
  • Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (or TESQA);
  • Victorian Registration and Qualifications Authority; and
  • Training Accreditation Council of Western Australia.


We note that the draft legislation currently limits the external training to persons who are not employees of a small business and this has received criticism from the accounting industry as it excludes sole traders and partners in partnerships who historically have been responsible for their own training to maintain their skill sets. We expect this requirement will be reviewed and the ATO may provide some further guidance in this regard.


How is the bonus deduction for the skills boost claimed?


The skills boost is proposed to apply to eligible expenditure incurred from 29 March 2022 (when the Federal Budget 2022–23 was announced) until 30 June 2024.


A small business entity could claim the bonus deduction in their 2023 tax return for eligible expenditure incurred during both income years ending 30 June 2022 and 2023. The bonus deduction for expenditure incurred in the income year ending 30 June 2024 will be claimed in the 2024 tax return.


What is the technology boost?


The proposed technology boost will give eligible small businesses a bonus 20% deduction for eligible expenditure on supporting digital adoption, which may include (but not limited to) expenditure on expenses and depreciating assets that support digital operations or digitising operations:

  • digital enabling items — computer and telecommunications hardware and equipment, software, systems and services that form and facilitate the use of computer networks;
  • digital media and marketing — audio and visual content that can be created, accessed, stored or viewed on digital devices;
  • e-commerce — supporting digitally ordered or platform enabled online transactions; and
  • repairs and improvement costs for depreciating assets.



We note that during the consultation period, before the draft legislation was released, there was significant feedback from the accounting industry asking for detailed clarification on what expenditure will and will not be eligible for the bonus 20% deduction. We anticipate that ATO guidance will follow the finalisation of the legislation to clarify this important issue.


There are certain types of expenditure which are expressly excluded from the technology boost, including:

  • Salary or wage costs;
  • Capital works costs that are deductible under Division 43 of the ITAA 1997 (which includes deductions for capital expenditure incurred in the construction of buildings and other capital works used to produce assessable income);
  • Financing costs, including interest and borrowing costs;
  • Training or education costs;
  • Expenditure incurred that forms part of the cost of trading stock;
  • Expenses incurred in the development of in-house software allocated to a software development pool; and
  • Depreciating assets if a balancing adjustment event occurs to the asset while the small business holds it, unless the balancing adjustment event is an involuntary disposal (which basically includes an assessable gain made when the proceeds from selling a depreciating asset exceed the written down value).


The bonus deduction under the technology boost will be capped to total expenditure up to $100,000, with the bonus deduction capped at $20,000 per year. Small businesses can continue to deduct expenditure over $100,000 under existing tax provisions.


The bonus deduction will be equal to 20% of the cost of an eligible depreciating asset that is used for a taxable purpose, regardless of whether the asset is fully expensed under the temporary full expensing regime or a deduction is claimed for the asset’s decline in value over its effective life under the uniform capital allowance regime.


If the expenditure includes mixed business and private use, the bonus deduction is available only to the extent of the proportion of the business expenditure. The business use (or taxable purpose) percentage applied in the first year the asset is used (or installed ready for use) will be applied here in all subsequent years for that asset.


How is the bonus deduction for the technology boost claimed?


The technology boost is proposed to apply to eligible expenditure incurred from 29 March 2022 (when the Federal Budget 2022–23 was announced) until 30 June 2023. We note the technology boost does not extend to the income year ending 30 June 2024, as it does for the skills boost.


A small business entity can claim the bonus deduction for the technology boost in their 2023 tax return (only), which includes eligible expenditure incurred during both income years ending 30 June 2022 and 2023.


Please do not hesitate to contact your Lowe Lippmann Relationship Partner if you wish to discuss any of these matters further.



September 2, 2026
Discretionary trusts and the proposed 30% minimum tax Discretionary trusts, often referred to as family trusts, have been a popular structure for Australian families and businesses for many decades. They are commonly used to operate family businesses, hold investments and assist with succession planning. Their flexibility, together with asset protection and estate planning benefits, has made them an attractive option for many groups. In the 2026–27 Federal Budget, the Government announced a significant proposed change. From 1 July 2028 , trustees of discretionary trusts would generally be required to pay a minimum tax of 30% on the trust's taxable income . According to the Government, the proposal is intended to better align the tax paid on trust income with that paid by salary and wage earners, while reducing opportunities to split income between family members. However, the announcement has generated considerable debate. Professional bodies, business groups and tax advisers have expressed concerns that the changes could increase complexity and compliance costs for many genuine family businesses and investment structures. How the proposal is expected to work Under the proposal, the trustee would generally pay the minimum 30% tax on the trust's taxable income. Where trust income is distributed to individual beneficiaries or certain other non-corporate beneficiaries , those beneficiaries would generally receive a non-refundable tax offset recognising the tax already paid by the trustee. This is intended to reduce the risk of the same income being taxed twice, but while maintaining the impact of the 30% minimum tax rate. Importantly, the minimum tax would not apply to every trust . The Government has indicated that a number of trusts would be excluded, including fixed trusts, widely held trusts, complying superannuation funds, charitable trusts, deceased estates, special disability trusts and genuine testamentary trusts. Primary production income and certain income relating to vulnerable minors would also be excluded. The Government has also stated that more than 90% of small businesses are not expected to be affected. While that may be reassuring for some taxpayers, there are still some important issues that could affect family groups using discretionary trusts. What could this mean in practice? One area likely to receive close attention is the use of companies as beneficiaries of family trusts. Many family groups have historically distributed some trust income to a company. This can provide flexibility in managing cash flow, retaining profits within the business and funding future growth. Under the proposed rules, however, the corporate beneficiary would not receive a tax offset for the tax already paid by the trustee . In many cases this will mean that income distributed from a discretionary trust to a company would be subject to double taxation. Another practical impact of the proposed change is that some family groups may find it more difficult to fully utilise existing tax losses. While the impact will depend on each group's circumstances, the proposed minimum tax is likely to reduce some of the flexibility that currently exists when managing taxable income across a family structure within many groups. The Government has also proposed a temporary three-year rollover period, commencing from 1 July 2027, to help restructure into alternative business structures , such as companies or fixed trusts, without triggering immediate income tax or capital gains tax consequences. While this may assist some groups, restructuring is rarely straightforward. Depending on the circumstances, it might be necessary to consider things like stamp duty, loan approvals, financing arrangements, contract changes, licensing requirements and professional advice. Even relatively simple restructures can involve significant time and cost, so careful planning will be important. The rules are not yet final At this stage, the proposal remains subject to consultation . Treasury released a consultation paper in July 2026 seeking feedback on a range of design issues, including how the new rules would operate in different situations. Final legislation has not yet been introduced , meaning aspects of the proposal could still change before the rules become law. For this reason, most groups utilising discretionary trust structures should avoid making major structural decisions based solely on the announcement. Instead, it is sensible to monitor developments while considering whether existing structures are likely to remain appropriate if the proposal proceeds. What should you do now? For many families, discretionary trusts are about much more than tax. They can continue to provide valuable asset protection, succession planning and business flexibility. The proposed changes do not remove those benefits, nor do they prevent discretionary trusts from continuing to be used. However, the proposal does have the potential to change the tax outcomes for some family groups, particularly those with more complex structures or those that regularly distribute income to companies. With the proposed start date still some time away, there is an opportunity to pause and carefully understand how the changes may affect your circumstances and consider whether any planning or restructuring might be appropriate. As the legislation develops, we can help you assess the impact on your business or investment structure and determine whether any action is warranted.
August 4, 2026
Government to permanently extend $20,000 instant asset write-off The Government has recently introduced legislation that would make the $20,000 instant asset write-off permanent for small businesses (as announced in the 2026 Federal Budget). If enacted, the changes would: permanently set the instant asset write-off threshold at $20,000 (instead of $1,000) for eligible depreciating assets first used, or installed ready for use, for a taxable purpose from 1 July 2026; and permanently set the general small business pool threshold at $20,000 from 1 July 2026. The changes would also further suspend the 'lock-out rule' until 30 June 2027. This rule otherwise prevents a business that has chosen not to use the simplified depreciation rules from re-entering the regime for five years.
July 7, 2026
High Court decision and ATO statement on Bendel’s Case The High Court recently handed down its decision in Bendel’s Case, confirming that an unpaid present entitlement (or UPE) between a discretionary trust and a beneficiary company does not fall within the extended definition of a “loan” for Division 7A purposes. The Australian Taxation Office released a Decision Impact Statement in response to the High Court findings, concluding the High Court's reasoning makes it clear that where a beneficiary company is entitled to a share of trust income that remains unpaid (a UPE) and the company takes no positive actions to call for payment of the entitlement, this will not fall within the expanded definition of a "loan" for Division 7A purposes. This is in contradiction to the ATO’s historical position that treated UPEs as "loans".
More Posts