Practice Update – January & February 2026

Lowe Lippmann Chartered Accountants

Mandating cash acceptance


The Government recently announced that it was delivering on its commitment "to mandate cash acceptance for essential purchases by finalising regulations that require fuel and grocery retailers to accept cash from 1 January 2026."


The changes mean that, from 1 January 2026, most food and grocery retailers must accept cash for in-person transactions of $500 or less between 7am and 9pm.


Small businesses with aggregate annual turnover under $10 million are generally exempted from this mandate. However, this mandate still applies to small businesses that choose to share a trademark with a large retailer.


The Government noted that, in addition to the cash mandate for fuel and groceries, consumers also already have the option to pay their bills, including utilities, phone bills and council rates, in cash at their local Australia Post outlet through Post Billpay.


The Government will review this mandate after three years, to ensure it is functioning as intended.


We prepared a Special Topic article within our Practice Update - December 2025, if you want to read more on this topic – click here.


ATO child support data-matching program


The ATO has advised that it will acquire child support data from Services Australia for the 2025 to 2027 income years, including the following:

  • client identification details (names, addresses, phone numbers, and dates of birth); and
  • child support details (child support identification reference number, child support role type, and child support category).


The ATO estimates that records relating to up to 300,000 individuals will be obtained each financial year, which will be matched against Australian Taxation Office (ATO) records.


The objectives of this program are to (among other things):

  • allow Services Australia to more accurately assess child support obligations, and maximise opportunities to collect child support debts; and
  • identify and educate individuals who may be failing to meet their lodgment obligations and help them to finalise their lodgment obligations, or notify the ATO that an income tax return is not required.

Time limits on GST and fuel tax credit claims


Taxpayers should note that GST credits and fuel tax credits will expire if not claimed within the 4-year credit time limit (ie. generally four years from the due date of the original BAS in which the taxpayer could have claimed them).


Once credits expire, the ATO has no discretion or ability to amend the assessment to include those credits.


The 4-year credit time limit is different to the period of review and applies more strictly.


There may be situations where the ATO is able to amend for overpaid or underpaid GST or overclaimed credits, but additional credits cannot be included in an amendment assessment.


If credits are near expiry, instead of writing to request an amendment, taxpayers should consider:

  • claiming the credits in their next BAS that is still within the 4-year credit time limit;
  • requesting the amendment by lodging a revised BAS for the tax period to which the credits are attributable (these are generally processed faster than amendment requests in other forms); or
  • lodging a valid objection against their assessment for the period to which the GST credits are attributable before the end of the 4-year credit time limit.


If you identify any unclaimed input tax credits, we can assist with actioning the above options to try and ensure entitlements to the credits are not lost.


Taxpayer's dog breeding activities held to be an enterprise


The Administrative Review Tribunal (ART) recently held that a taxpayer had carried on an enterprise of dog breeding for GST purposes.


He had lodged activity statements for the quarters ended 30 September 2018 to 31 December 2021 inclusive, claiming input tax credits (ITCs) for the dog breeding activities he carried on from his home (among other activities).


The ATO disallowed the taxpayer's claims for the above periods, arguing that enterprises were not carried on, and that there was a lack of appropriate substantiation (among other reasons).


The ART however held that the taxpayer's dog breeding operation was an enterprise for GST purposes, noting that his activities had "the necessary commercial character." Therefore, the taxpayer was entitled to ITCs for that enterprise.


However, the ART affirmed the ATO's decision to reduce the taxpayer's other ITC claims, such as in relation to stamp duty on the acquisition of a property and for café and grocery expenses.


The ART also admonished the taxpayer for apparently using artificial intelligence in the presentation of his case, as he appeared to rely on cases and principles that did not exist.


Paying super guarantee


The ATO is reminding employers that they must pay super guarantee (SG) contributions for eligible employees.


Employers need to pay a minimum of 12% (the current SG rate as from 1 July 2025) of each employee's ordinary time earnings into a complying super fund on a quarterly basis (the due date for the March 2026 quarter is 28 April 2026).


In most cases, employees can choose the super fund.


Employers who do not pay in full, on time or to the correct super fund will have to pay the SG charge, which is made up of the super they owe, nominal interest on those amounts (currently 10%), and an administration fee of $20 per employee, per quarter.


These payments must be made through SuperStream (where super payments and information move through the system electronically).


Employers who use the Small Business Superannuation Clearing House to make super contributions should note that this service will be permanently closed from 1 July 2026. Existing users should switch to an alternative method to pay their employees' super guarantee.


Also, when new employees start, employers may have an extra step to take to comply with the 'choice of fund rules' if the new employee does not choose a super fund. Employers may now need to request the new employee's 'stapled super fund' details from the ATO.


Tax dodgers banned from leaving the country


The ATO is actively using departure prohibition orders (DPOs) as part of a broader shift towards strengthening payment performance and debt collection. A DPO is an enforcement action available to the ATO to prevent certain persons with tax liabilities from leaving Australia without paying their outstanding tax.


Since July 2025, the ATO has issued 21 DPOs, more than the total number issued in the entire financial year ended 30 June 2025.


The ATO notes that a taxpayer was recently prevented from boarding a flight in the early hours of the morning due to a DPO imposed because of deliberate non-payment of a significant debt.



Please do not hesitate to contact your Lowe Lippmann Relationship Partner if you wish to discuss any of these matters further.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation


September 4, 2026
Yesterday, Treasurer Jim Chalmers released draft legislation to implement the key components of the 30% minimum trust tax on discretionary trusts announced in the Federal Budget during May 2026.
September 2, 2026
Discretionary trusts and the proposed 30% minimum tax Discretionary trusts, often referred to as family trusts, have been a popular structure for Australian families and businesses for many decades. They are commonly used to operate family businesses, hold investments and assist with succession planning. Their flexibility, together with asset protection and estate planning benefits, has made them an attractive option for many groups. In the 2026–27 Federal Budget, the Government announced a significant proposed change. From 1 July 2028 , trustees of discretionary trusts would generally be required to pay a minimum tax of 30% on the trust's taxable income . According to the Government, the proposal is intended to better align the tax paid on trust income with that paid by salary and wage earners, while reducing opportunities to split income between family members. However, the announcement has generated considerable debate. Professional bodies, business groups and tax advisers have expressed concerns that the changes could increase complexity and compliance costs for many genuine family businesses and investment structures. How the proposal is expected to work Under the proposal, the trustee would generally pay the minimum 30% tax on the trust's taxable income. Where trust income is distributed to individual beneficiaries or certain other non-corporate beneficiaries , those beneficiaries would generally receive a non-refundable tax offset recognising the tax already paid by the trustee. This is intended to reduce the risk of the same income being taxed twice, but while maintaining the impact of the 30% minimum tax rate. Importantly, the minimum tax would not apply to every trust . The Government has indicated that a number of trusts would be excluded, including fixed trusts, widely held trusts, complying superannuation funds, charitable trusts, deceased estates, special disability trusts and genuine testamentary trusts. Primary production income and certain income relating to vulnerable minors would also be excluded. The Government has also stated that more than 90% of small businesses are not expected to be affected. While that may be reassuring for some taxpayers, there are still some important issues that could affect family groups using discretionary trusts. What could this mean in practice? One area likely to receive close attention is the use of companies as beneficiaries of family trusts. Many family groups have historically distributed some trust income to a company. This can provide flexibility in managing cash flow, retaining profits within the business and funding future growth. Under the proposed rules, however, the corporate beneficiary would not receive a tax offset for the tax already paid by the trustee . In many cases this will mean that income distributed from a discretionary trust to a company would be subject to double taxation. Another practical impact of the proposed change is that some family groups may find it more difficult to fully utilise existing tax losses. While the impact will depend on each group's circumstances, the proposed minimum tax is likely to reduce some of the flexibility that currently exists when managing taxable income across a family structure within many groups. The Government has also proposed a temporary three-year rollover period, commencing from 1 July 2027, to help restructure into alternative business structures , such as companies or fixed trusts, without triggering immediate income tax or capital gains tax consequences. While this may assist some groups, restructuring is rarely straightforward. Depending on the circumstances, it might be necessary to consider things like stamp duty, loan approvals, financing arrangements, contract changes, licensing requirements and professional advice. Even relatively simple restructures can involve significant time and cost, so careful planning will be important. The rules are not yet final At this stage, the proposal remains subject to consultation . Treasury released a consultation paper in July 2026 seeking feedback on a range of design issues, including how the new rules would operate in different situations. Final legislation has not yet been introduced , meaning aspects of the proposal could still change before the rules become law. For this reason, most groups utilising discretionary trust structures should avoid making major structural decisions based solely on the announcement. Instead, it is sensible to monitor developments while considering whether existing structures are likely to remain appropriate if the proposal proceeds. What should you do now? For many families, discretionary trusts are about much more than tax. They can continue to provide valuable asset protection, succession planning and business flexibility. The proposed changes do not remove those benefits, nor do they prevent discretionary trusts from continuing to be used. However, the proposal does have the potential to change the tax outcomes for some family groups, particularly those with more complex structures or those that regularly distribute income to companies. With the proposed start date still some time away, there is an opportunity to pause and carefully understand how the changes may affect your circumstances and consider whether any planning or restructuring might be appropriate. As the legislation develops, we can help you assess the impact on your business or investment structure and determine whether any action is warranted.
August 4, 2026
Government to permanently extend $20,000 instant asset write-off The Government has recently introduced legislation that would make the $20,000 instant asset write-off permanent for small businesses (as announced in the 2026 Federal Budget). If enacted, the changes would: permanently set the instant asset write-off threshold at $20,000 (instead of $1,000) for eligible depreciating assets first used, or installed ready for use, for a taxable purpose from 1 July 2026; and permanently set the general small business pool threshold at $20,000 from 1 July 2026. The changes would also further suspend the 'lock-out rule' until 30 June 2027. This rule otherwise prevents a business that has chosen not to use the simplified depreciation rules from re-entering the regime for five years.
More Posts