Practice Update – October 2025

Lowe Lippmann Chartered Accountants

ATO interest charges are no longer tax deductible – What you can do


As we explained in our Practice Update for September, general interest charge (GIC) and shortfall interest charge (SIC) imposed by the ATO is no longer tax-deductible from 1 July 2025. This applies regardless of whether the underlying tax debt relates to past or future income years.


With GIC currently at 11.17%, this is now one of the most expensive forms of finance in the market — and unlike in the past, you won’t get a deduction to offset the cost. For many taxpayers, this makes relying on an ATO payment plan a costly strategy.


Refinancing ATO debt


Businesses can sometimes refinance tax debts with a bank or other lender. Unlike GIC and SIC amounts, interest on these loans might be deductible for tax purposes, provided the borrowing is connected to business activities.


While tax debts will sometimes relate to income tax or CGT liabilities, remember that interest could also be deductible where money is borrowed to pay other tax debts relating to a business, such as:

  • GST;
  • PAYG instalments;
  • PAYG withholding for employees; and
  • FBT.


However, before taking any action to refinance ATO debt it is important to carefully consider whether you will be able to deduct the interest expenses or not.


Individuals


If you are an individual with a tax debt, the treatment of interest expenses incurred on a loan used to pay that tax debt really depends on the extent to which the tax debt arose from a business activity:

  • Sole traders: If you are genuinely carrying on a business, interest on borrowings used to pay tax debts from that business is generally deductible.
  • Employees or investors: If your tax debt relates to salary, wages, rental income, dividends, or other investment income, the interest is not deductible. Refinancing may still reduce overall interest costs depending on the interest rate on the new loan, but it won’t generate a tax deduction.

As an example, Sam is a sole trader who runs a café. He borrows $30,000 to pay his tax debt, which arose entirely from his café profits. The interest should be fully deductible.

 

However, if Sam also earns salary or wages from a part-time job and some of his tax debt relates to the employment income, only a portion of the interest on the loan used to pay the tax debt would be deductible. If $20,000 of the tax debt relates to his business and $10,000 relates to employment activities, then only 2/3rds of the interest expenses would be deductible.

Companies and trusts


If a company or trust borrows to pay its own tax debts (income tax, GST, PAYG withholding, FBT), the interest will usually be deductible if it can be traced back to a debt that arose from carrying on a business.


However, if a director or beneficiary borrows money personally to cover those debts, the interest would not normally be deductible to them.


Partnerships


The position is more complex when it comes to partnership arrangements. If the borrowing is at the partnership level and it relates to a tax debt that arose from a business carried on by the partnership then the interest should normally be deductible. For example, this could include interest on money borrowed to pay business tax obligations such as GST or PAYG withholding amounts.


However, the ATO takes the view that if an individual who is a partner in a partnership borrows money personally to pay a tax debt relating to their share of the profits of the partnership, the interest isn’t deductible. The ATO treats this as a personal expense, even if the partnership is carrying on a business activity.


Practical takeaway


Leaving debts outstanding with the ATO is now more expensive than ever because GIC and SIC are no longer deductible.


Refinancing the tax debt with an external lender might provide you with a tax deduction and might also enable you to access lower interest rates.


The key is to distinguish between tax debts that relate to a business activity and other tax debts. For mixed situations, you may need to apportion the deduction.


If you are unsure how this applies to you, talk to us before arranging finance. With the right strategy, you can manage tax debts more effectively and avoid costly surprises.


Employees incorrectly treated as independent contractors


The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) is warning businesses that if they incorrectly treat an employee as an independent contractor, then they risk receiving penalties and charges, including:

  • PAYG withholding penalty for failing to deduct tax from worker payments and send it to the ATO;
  • Super guarantee charge (SGC), which is more than the super that would have been paid if the worker was classified correctly. SGC consists of a super guarantee shortfall amount, nominal interest, and an administration fee; and
  • Additional SG penalties, including a penalty amount of up to 200% of the SGC.


'Sham contracting' may also contravene the Fair Work Act 2009.  Courts can impose penalties against a business or person that incorrectly informs an employee that they are an independent contractor.


Reminder of September Quarter Superannuation Guarantee (SG)


Employers are reminded that employee super contributions for the quarter ending 30 September 2025 must be received by the relevant super funds by Tuesday, 28 October 2025. If the correct amount of SG is not paid by an employer on time, they will be liable to pay the SG charge, which (as noted above) includes a penalty and interest component.


Correctly dealing with rental property repairs


Taxpayers who have had work done on their rental property should ensure the expense is categorised correctly to avoid errors when completing their tax return.


A deduction for 'repairs and maintenance' expenses can be claimed for work done to remedy, or prevent defects, damage or deterioration from using the property to earn income. These expenses can be claimed in the year they were incurred.


However, some 'capital' expenditure may not be immediately deductible, such as for 'initial repairs', 'capital works', 'improvements' and depreciating assets.


Initial repairs include fixing any pre-existing damage or deterioration that existed at the time of purchasing the property, even if the damage or deterioration was unknown to the taxpayer at the time of purchase.


Initial repairs are treated as part of the acquisition cost and included in the cost base of the property for CGT purposes, unless they are capital works or depreciating assets.


Capital works are structural improvements, alterations and extensions to the property, and can generally be claimed at 2.5% over 40 years.


Capital works deductions can only be claimed after the work has been completed, regardless of when the taxpayer pays the deposit and instalments.


Improvements or renovations that are structural are also capital works. Work that goes beyond remedying defects, damage or deterioration that improves the function of the property is regarded as an improvement.


Repairs to an 'entirety' are capital and cannot be claimed as repairs. Repairs to an entirety generally involve the replacement or reconstruction of something separately identifiable as a capital item.


Depreciating assets are treated as follows:

  • Deductions for 'new' assets must generally be claimed over time according to their effective life.
  • Second-hand depreciating assets generally cannot be deducted.

Tips to help sole trader clients


The ATO is seeing sole traders make mistakes in the following areas:

  • not reporting all income — this includes income earned outside their business (like a 'side hustle'), cash jobs, or payments in-kind/barter deals;
  • overclaiming expenses — this includes claiming the portion of an expense related to personal use, or overstating the cost of goods sold and other business expenses;
  • calculating business losses;
  • incorrectly claiming and offsetting losses from non-commercial business activities against other income sources;
  • misreporting personal services income (PSI) to gain tax benefits;
  • not registering for GST if they are in the taxi or ride-sourcing industry, or when they reach the GST threshold; and
  • not keeping accurate and complete records.

ATO warning regarding private use of work vehicles and FBT


Employers that supply work vehicles to their employees need to check how the work vehicles are used and whether any exemptions apply to determine if they attract fringe benefits tax (FBT).


FBT generally applies when a work vehicle is made available for private use, even if it is not actually used. Private use includes any travel not directly related to the employee's job.


Exemptions may apply depending on the vehicle's specifications and the nature of the private use.


The most common issues the ATO sees include the following:

  • incorrectly treating private use as business use;
  • assuming dual cab utes are exempt from FBT — exemptions only apply if the vehicle is eligible for the specific FBT exemption and private use is limited;
  • incorrectly classifying vehicles;
  • poor record keeping that does not support the claims or the FBT calculations made; and
  • not reporting or paying on time.

ART dismisses argument that medical expenses were deductible


In a recent decision, the Administrative Review Tribunal (ART) held that a taxpayer could not claim a tax deduction for medical expenses incurred by him in relation to his total and permanent disability pension.


The taxpayer had been terminated from his employment due to total and permanent disablement (TPD). For the 2024 income year, his only income was a TPD pension.


The taxpayer wanted to claim a deduction for medical expenses to be incurred, estimated to be approximately $100,000 in the 2024 income year.


The ART agreed with the ATO that the medical expenses were not deductible. The ART noted in this regard that the medical expenses were "incurred by (the taxpayer) to better live with his medical condition, not incurred 'in' gaining or producing the TPD pension." That is, "the occasion of the Medical Expenses is to assist (the taxpayer) with his medical condition, not to gain or maintain his eligibility to the TPD pension."


The ART also did not accept the taxpayer's argument that the medical expenses were not private or domestic in nature, as they were essentially personal in character.


Accessing superannuation funds for medical treatment or financial hardship


Superannuation is one of the largest assets for many Australians and offers significant tax advantages, however, strict rules apply to when it can be accessed. While super is most commonly accessed at retirement, death or disability, there are limited situations where earlier access may be possible.


Early access is generally available in two situations:

  • Financial hardship:  Where you are receiving a qualifying Centrelink/DVA payment for a minimum period and cannot meet immediate living expenses.
  • Compassionate grounds:  Funding for certain specific scenarios which include preventing a mortgage foreclosure or meeting medical expenses for a life-threatening injury or illness or to alleviate severe chronic pain.


Compassionate grounds access requires an application to be made to the ATO which needs to be accompanied by relevant medical certificates or mortgage information. If approved the ATO will provide instructions to the individual’s superannuation fund to release an amount to cover the expense. We have included some ATO links with more detailed information on compassionate grounds and financial hardship below.


When accessing superannuation under compassionate grounds you would usually collect the relevant supporting documentation and personally make the application for approval using your MyGov account. It has come to the ATO’s attention that there may be medical and dental providers exploiting this access and assisting super fund members to access amounts for cosmetic reasons (you may have even seen advertisements pop up on your social media showing people with a new sparkling smile – and a lower super balance).


The ATO’s concerns are discussed in Separating fact from fiction on accessing your super early.


Superannuation fund members and SMSF trustees should be aware that there can be substantial penalties applied when super is accessed outside of the legislated conditions of release. You should never provide another party with access to your MyGov login or allow a third party to make applications on your behalf. Penalties may also apply for making false declarations.


Should you have any questions or concerns relating to proposed access to your superannuation please contact us.



Please do not hesitate to contact your Lowe Lippmann Relationship Partner if you wish to discuss any of these matters further.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation


September 4, 2026
Yesterday, Treasurer Jim Chalmers released draft legislation to implement the key components of the 30% minimum trust tax on discretionary trusts announced in the Federal Budget during May 2026.
September 2, 2026
Discretionary trusts and the proposed 30% minimum tax Discretionary trusts, often referred to as family trusts, have been a popular structure for Australian families and businesses for many decades. They are commonly used to operate family businesses, hold investments and assist with succession planning. Their flexibility, together with asset protection and estate planning benefits, has made them an attractive option for many groups. In the 2026–27 Federal Budget, the Government announced a significant proposed change. From 1 July 2028 , trustees of discretionary trusts would generally be required to pay a minimum tax of 30% on the trust's taxable income . According to the Government, the proposal is intended to better align the tax paid on trust income with that paid by salary and wage earners, while reducing opportunities to split income between family members. However, the announcement has generated considerable debate. Professional bodies, business groups and tax advisers have expressed concerns that the changes could increase complexity and compliance costs for many genuine family businesses and investment structures. How the proposal is expected to work Under the proposal, the trustee would generally pay the minimum 30% tax on the trust's taxable income. Where trust income is distributed to individual beneficiaries or certain other non-corporate beneficiaries , those beneficiaries would generally receive a non-refundable tax offset recognising the tax already paid by the trustee. This is intended to reduce the risk of the same income being taxed twice, but while maintaining the impact of the 30% minimum tax rate. Importantly, the minimum tax would not apply to every trust . The Government has indicated that a number of trusts would be excluded, including fixed trusts, widely held trusts, complying superannuation funds, charitable trusts, deceased estates, special disability trusts and genuine testamentary trusts. Primary production income and certain income relating to vulnerable minors would also be excluded. The Government has also stated that more than 90% of small businesses are not expected to be affected. While that may be reassuring for some taxpayers, there are still some important issues that could affect family groups using discretionary trusts. What could this mean in practice? One area likely to receive close attention is the use of companies as beneficiaries of family trusts. Many family groups have historically distributed some trust income to a company. This can provide flexibility in managing cash flow, retaining profits within the business and funding future growth. Under the proposed rules, however, the corporate beneficiary would not receive a tax offset for the tax already paid by the trustee . In many cases this will mean that income distributed from a discretionary trust to a company would be subject to double taxation. Another practical impact of the proposed change is that some family groups may find it more difficult to fully utilise existing tax losses. While the impact will depend on each group's circumstances, the proposed minimum tax is likely to reduce some of the flexibility that currently exists when managing taxable income across a family structure within many groups. The Government has also proposed a temporary three-year rollover period, commencing from 1 July 2027, to help restructure into alternative business structures , such as companies or fixed trusts, without triggering immediate income tax or capital gains tax consequences. While this may assist some groups, restructuring is rarely straightforward. Depending on the circumstances, it might be necessary to consider things like stamp duty, loan approvals, financing arrangements, contract changes, licensing requirements and professional advice. Even relatively simple restructures can involve significant time and cost, so careful planning will be important. The rules are not yet final At this stage, the proposal remains subject to consultation . Treasury released a consultation paper in July 2026 seeking feedback on a range of design issues, including how the new rules would operate in different situations. Final legislation has not yet been introduced , meaning aspects of the proposal could still change before the rules become law. For this reason, most groups utilising discretionary trust structures should avoid making major structural decisions based solely on the announcement. Instead, it is sensible to monitor developments while considering whether existing structures are likely to remain appropriate if the proposal proceeds. What should you do now? For many families, discretionary trusts are about much more than tax. They can continue to provide valuable asset protection, succession planning and business flexibility. The proposed changes do not remove those benefits, nor do they prevent discretionary trusts from continuing to be used. However, the proposal does have the potential to change the tax outcomes for some family groups, particularly those with more complex structures or those that regularly distribute income to companies. With the proposed start date still some time away, there is an opportunity to pause and carefully understand how the changes may affect your circumstances and consider whether any planning or restructuring might be appropriate. As the legislation develops, we can help you assess the impact on your business or investment structure and determine whether any action is warranted.
August 4, 2026
Government to permanently extend $20,000 instant asset write-off The Government has recently introduced legislation that would make the $20,000 instant asset write-off permanent for small businesses (as announced in the 2026 Federal Budget). If enacted, the changes would: permanently set the instant asset write-off threshold at $20,000 (instead of $1,000) for eligible depreciating assets first used, or installed ready for use, for a taxable purpose from 1 July 2026; and permanently set the general small business pool threshold at $20,000 from 1 July 2026. The changes would also further suspend the 'lock-out rule' until 30 June 2027. This rule otherwise prevents a business that has chosen not to use the simplified depreciation rules from re-entering the regime for five years.
More Posts