Tax Alert - 2023 FBT year end

Lowe Lippmann Chartered Accountants

2023 FBT Year End is Fast Approaching!


The end of the Fringe Benefits Tax (FBT) year is fast approaching on 31 March 2023, so we take this opportunity to revisit some hot FBT topics for both employers and employees, including:

  • FBT exemption for electric cars
  • Work from home arrangements
  • Car parking changes
  • Mismatched information for entertainment claimed as a deduction and what is reported for FBT purposes
  • Business assets personally used by owners and staff
  • Employee contributions for FBT purposes and salary sacrifice
  • Not lodging FBT returns
  • Travelling or living away from home
  • Housekeeping essentials

FBT exemption for electric cars

 

Electric cars represent a small but growing proportion of the new car market in Australia.  To encourage Australians to make the shift, the Government has passed legislation that provides an FBT exemption for certain no or low emissions vehicles from 1 July 2022.

 

This means that providing your team members with the use of electric cars, hydrogen fuel cell electric cars or plug-in hybrid electric cars can now potentially qualify for an FBT exemption.  The FBT exemption should normally apply where:

  • The value of the car is below the luxury car tax threshold for fuel efficient vehicles ($84,916 for the 2022-23 financial year); and
  • The car is both first held and used on or after 1 July 2022.

 

If your business provides these benefits to employees your business will still need to work out the taxable value of the car benefit as if the FBT exemption didn’t apply.  This is because the value of this exempt car benefit is still taken into account in the reportable fringe benefits amount of the employee.

 

While income tax is not paid on this amount, it can impact the employee in a range of areas (such as the Medicare levy surcharge, private health insurance rebate, employee share scheme reduction, and social security payments).


FBT and work from home arrangements

 

Post the pandemic, many workplaces have shifted from fully remote, to a combination of remote and in-office work.  To keep everyone productive, many employers have provided employees with work-related items such as laptops and mobile phones.

 

Providing these devices shouldn’t trigger an FBT liability as long they are primarily used for work purposes.  Where multiple similar items have been provided during the FBT year, the situation becomes more complex unless your business is a small business (has an aggregated turnover of less than $50 million).

 

If an FBT exemption isn’t available, it is often worth considering whether the FBT liability on these items could be reduced by the employee purchasing the item themselves and claiming a once-only deduction in their personal return.


More workplaces caught by car parking changes

 

A controversial ruling from the ATO has expanded the scope of the FBT rules dealing with car parking benefits meaning that more employers will be considered to be providing car parking benefits to staff.

 

The ruling expands the definition of what constitutes a commercial parking station. It can now include parking stations that charge penalty rates for all-day parking to the public, such as those normally located in shopping centres.

 

Where an employer provides:

  • Car parking facilities for employees within 1km of a commercial parking station, and
  • That commercial car park charges more than the car parking threshold ($9.72 for the year ended 31 March 2023)

a taxable car parking fringe benefit will normally arise unless the employer is a small business and able to access the car parking exemption.

 

This new expanded definition of a commercial parking station applies from 1 April 2022. If you provide car parking facilities to team members, it is important that you either:

  • Have certainty that you are able to access the small business exemption (which has a more generous business turnover threshold of less than $50m from 1 April 2021 onwards); or
  • Understand the implications of the ruling to the car park facilities you provide.

Mismatched information for entertainment claimed as a deduction and what is reported for FBT purposes

 

One of the easiest ways for the ATO to pick up on problem areas is where there are mismatches.

 

When it comes to entertainment, employers are keen to claim a deduction but this is not recognised as a fringe benefit provided to employees.

 

Expenses related to entertainment such as a meal in a restaurant are generally not deductible and no GST credits can be claimed unless the expenses are subject to FBT.

 

Let’s say you taken a client out to lunch and the amount per head is less than $300.  If your business uses the ‘actual’ method for FBT purposes then there should not be any FBT implications.  This is because benefits provided to client are not subject to FBT and minor benefits (ie. value of less than $300) provided to employees on an infrequent and irregular basis are generally exempt from FBT.  However, no deductions should be claimed for the entertainment and no GST credits would normally be available either.

 

If the business uses the 50/50 method, then 50% of the meal entertainment expenses would be subject to FBT (the minor benefits exemption would not apply).  As a result, 50% of the expenses would be deductible and the business would be able to claim 50% of the GST credits.


Business assets personally used by owners and staff

 

Private use of business assets is an area that crosses across a whole series of tax areas: FBT, GST, Division 7A and income tax.

 

Take the ATO’s example of the property company that claimed deductions for a boat on the basis that it was used for marketing the company. Large deductions were claimed relating to running the boat.  This attracted the ATO’s attention and a review was carried out.

 

The ATO discovered the boat was used by the director and other employees for private trips, and to host parties for people who had paid to attend the company's property seminars.

 

When looking at the overall business activities, the ATO determined the director had purchased the boat primarily for their own private use.  As a result, they disallowed the deductions and the private use of the boat was a fringe benefit for the employees of the company.  The company had to lodge an FBT return and pay the resulting FBT liability, as well as the income tax shortfall, interest and penalties.


Employee contributions for FBT purposes and salary sacrifice

 

An issue that frequently causes confusion is the difference between the employee salary sacrificing in order to receive a fringe benefit and making an employee contribution towards the value of that fringe benefit.

 

To be an effective salary sacrifice arrangement (SSA), the agreement must be entered into before the employee becomes entitled to the income (eg. before the period in which they start to perform the services that will result in the payment of salary etc.).

 

Where an employee has salary sacrificed on a pre-tax basis towards the fringe benefit provided – laptop, car, etc., they have agreed to give up a portion of their gross salary on a pre-tax basis and receive the relevant fringe benefit instead.

 

As a starting point, the taxable value of the fringe benefit is the full value of the expense paid by the employer.  The salary sacrifice arrangement doesn’t reduce the FBT liability for the employer.

 

The employer recognises a lower cost of salary and wages provided to the employee as their ‘cost saving’, which results in lower PAYG withholding and in most cases, superannuation guarantee obligations, but they still recognise the full value of the fringe benefit as part of their taxable fringe benefit which is subject to FBT.

 

The employee recognises that they have a reduced amount of salary and wages, and a non-cash benefit in the form of the fringe benefit.


Not lodging FBT returns

 

The ATO is concerned that some employers are not lodging FBT returns or lodging them late to avoid paying tax.

 

The ATO will normally pay close attention to any employer that:

  • Is registered for FBT but lodges late.  If your business is likely to face delays in lodging the FBT return, it’s usually a good idea to get in touch with the ATO early and ask for an extension request; or
  • Is not registered for FBT. If your business employs staff (even closely held staff such as family members), and is not registered for FBT, it’s essential you have reviewed your position and are certain that you do not have an FBT liability. If the business provides cars, car spaces, reimburses private (not business) expenses, provides entertainment (food and drink), employee discounts etc., then you are likely to be providing a fringe benefit.

Travelling or living away from home

 

The ATO have recently finalised their guidance on travel costs and will be looking closely at transport, meal and accommodation benefits.

 

Travel allowances often cause confusion for many businesses. If your business provides travel allowances to employees, you will normally need to consider whether they are living away from home or just travelling overnight in the course of work.

 

Where your employees are travelling overnight in the course of work, these travel allowances are normally assessable to your employees.  However, they might be entitled to personally claim deductions for some of their travel expenses.

 

For workers that are living away from home, these allowances are dealt with instead through the FBT system as a fringe benefit. While the taxable value of the benefit is usually the amount paid, there are some generous concessions that can allow for some or all of the allowance to be FBT exempt if certain conditions are met.

 

As a result, getting the distinction right between travelling overnight for work or living away from home is important.

 

The ATO explains in Taxation Ruling TR 2021/4 when allowances should be classified as a travel allowance or a living away from home allowance. Helpfully, the ATO has also finalised a ‘safe harbour’ style approach in Practical Compliance Guideline PCG 2021/3 which can be used specifically for this purpose.


FBT housekeeping

 

It can be difficult to ensure the required records are maintained in relation to fringe benefits – especially as this may depend on employees producing records at a certain time.

 

If your business has cars and you need to record odometer readings at the first and last days of the FBT year (31 March and 1 April), remember to have your team take a photo on their phone and email it through to a central contact person – it will save running around to every car, or missing records where employees forget.


Please do not hesitate to contact your Lowe Lippmann Relationship Partner if you wish to discuss any of these matters further.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation

September 4, 2026
Yesterday, Treasurer Jim Chalmers released draft legislation to implement the key components of the 30% minimum trust tax on discretionary trusts announced in the Federal Budget during May 2026.
September 2, 2026
Discretionary trusts and the proposed 30% minimum tax Discretionary trusts, often referred to as family trusts, have been a popular structure for Australian families and businesses for many decades. They are commonly used to operate family businesses, hold investments and assist with succession planning. Their flexibility, together with asset protection and estate planning benefits, has made them an attractive option for many groups. In the 2026–27 Federal Budget, the Government announced a significant proposed change. From 1 July 2028 , trustees of discretionary trusts would generally be required to pay a minimum tax of 30% on the trust's taxable income . According to the Government, the proposal is intended to better align the tax paid on trust income with that paid by salary and wage earners, while reducing opportunities to split income between family members. However, the announcement has generated considerable debate. Professional bodies, business groups and tax advisers have expressed concerns that the changes could increase complexity and compliance costs for many genuine family businesses and investment structures. How the proposal is expected to work Under the proposal, the trustee would generally pay the minimum 30% tax on the trust's taxable income. Where trust income is distributed to individual beneficiaries or certain other non-corporate beneficiaries , those beneficiaries would generally receive a non-refundable tax offset recognising the tax already paid by the trustee. This is intended to reduce the risk of the same income being taxed twice, but while maintaining the impact of the 30% minimum tax rate. Importantly, the minimum tax would not apply to every trust . The Government has indicated that a number of trusts would be excluded, including fixed trusts, widely held trusts, complying superannuation funds, charitable trusts, deceased estates, special disability trusts and genuine testamentary trusts. Primary production income and certain income relating to vulnerable minors would also be excluded. The Government has also stated that more than 90% of small businesses are not expected to be affected. While that may be reassuring for some taxpayers, there are still some important issues that could affect family groups using discretionary trusts. What could this mean in practice? One area likely to receive close attention is the use of companies as beneficiaries of family trusts. Many family groups have historically distributed some trust income to a company. This can provide flexibility in managing cash flow, retaining profits within the business and funding future growth. Under the proposed rules, however, the corporate beneficiary would not receive a tax offset for the tax already paid by the trustee . In many cases this will mean that income distributed from a discretionary trust to a company would be subject to double taxation. Another practical impact of the proposed change is that some family groups may find it more difficult to fully utilise existing tax losses. While the impact will depend on each group's circumstances, the proposed minimum tax is likely to reduce some of the flexibility that currently exists when managing taxable income across a family structure within many groups. The Government has also proposed a temporary three-year rollover period, commencing from 1 July 2027, to help restructure into alternative business structures , such as companies or fixed trusts, without triggering immediate income tax or capital gains tax consequences. While this may assist some groups, restructuring is rarely straightforward. Depending on the circumstances, it might be necessary to consider things like stamp duty, loan approvals, financing arrangements, contract changes, licensing requirements and professional advice. Even relatively simple restructures can involve significant time and cost, so careful planning will be important. The rules are not yet final At this stage, the proposal remains subject to consultation . Treasury released a consultation paper in July 2026 seeking feedback on a range of design issues, including how the new rules would operate in different situations. Final legislation has not yet been introduced , meaning aspects of the proposal could still change before the rules become law. For this reason, most groups utilising discretionary trust structures should avoid making major structural decisions based solely on the announcement. Instead, it is sensible to monitor developments while considering whether existing structures are likely to remain appropriate if the proposal proceeds. What should you do now? For many families, discretionary trusts are about much more than tax. They can continue to provide valuable asset protection, succession planning and business flexibility. The proposed changes do not remove those benefits, nor do they prevent discretionary trusts from continuing to be used. However, the proposal does have the potential to change the tax outcomes for some family groups, particularly those with more complex structures or those that regularly distribute income to companies. With the proposed start date still some time away, there is an opportunity to pause and carefully understand how the changes may affect your circumstances and consider whether any planning or restructuring might be appropriate. As the legislation develops, we can help you assess the impact on your business or investment structure and determine whether any action is warranted.
August 4, 2026
Government to permanently extend $20,000 instant asset write-off The Government has recently introduced legislation that would make the $20,000 instant asset write-off permanent for small businesses (as announced in the 2026 Federal Budget). If enacted, the changes would: permanently set the instant asset write-off threshold at $20,000 (instead of $1,000) for eligible depreciating assets first used, or installed ready for use, for a taxable purpose from 1 July 2026; and permanently set the general small business pool threshold at $20,000 from 1 July 2026. The changes would also further suspend the 'lock-out rule' until 30 June 2027. This rule otherwise prevents a business that has chosen not to use the simplified depreciation rules from re-entering the regime for five years.
More Posts