Tax Alert - Commercial and Industrial Property Tax Reform

Lowe Lippmann Chartered Accountants

Commercial and Industrial Property Tax Reform


The Victorian Government announced in the 2023-24 State Budget it will be progressively abolishing stamp duty on commercial and industrial property and replacing it with an annual tax, based on unimproved land value, called the Commercial and Industrial Property Tax (the CIP Tax).


The CIP Tax regime will apply to commercial and industrial property transactions with both a contract and settlement date on or after 1 July 2024.


CIP Tax regime explained


For eligible commercial and industrial properties, stamp duty will be paid one final time on the property if (and when) it is transacted, and the new annual CIP Tax will be payable 10 years after the final stamp duty payment, regardless of whether that property has transacted again.


If a property is sold again (even if it is sold multiple times) within the 10 year transition period, stamp duty will not apply if the property continues to be used for commercial and industrial purposes.


Eligible purchasers of commercial or industrial property will be given the choice to either:

  • pay the property’s final stamp duty liability as a lump sum in the ordinary course; or
  • finance stamp duty through a government facilitated transition loan, as an alternative to self-financing the upfront stamp duty amount, allowing the purchaser to make annual loan repayments (plus interest) over 10 years.


After the 10 year transition period ends, the property will become liable for the CIP Tax which will be set at 1.0% of the property’s unimproved land value, with no tax free threshold.


The CIP Tax will be separate from (and in addition to) the existing Victorian land tax regime. However, the existing land tax exemptions will apply to the CIP Tax.


Commercial and industrial property transactions that are currently exempt from stamp duty will not enter the CIP Tax regime. This includes transfers such as: deceased estates, certain transfers between spouse or partner; or purchases by charities and friendly societies.


The CIP Tax will not be available for properties primarily used for residential, primary production, community services, sport, or heritage and culture purposes, as coded by the Valuer-General.


Mixed use properties


Some properties may have a mixture of uses across different occupancies, for example a street level shop with a residence above. In this example, the property may have more than one property classification code, and they may have a mixture of qualifying (ie. commercial) and non-qualifying (ie. residential) uses.


For such properties, the sole or primary use test will be used to determine if the CIP Tax will apply. 


The sole or primary use test can be in reference to factors such as the land or floor area of each use; the relative economic and financial significance of each use, and the length of time of each use, with “primary” use ultimately determined by the Commissioner of State Revenue.


If the sole or primary use test indicates that a property with several occupancies is qualifying (ie. commercial), the CIP Tax will apply to the entire mixed-use property.


If the primary use of the property is determined to be non-qualifying (ie. residential), then the CIP Tax will not apply to the property.


Change in use of property


A property with a commercial or industrial use may change to a different use over time, for example an industrial warehouse could be re-developed into residential apartments.


From 1 July 2024, a property owner who purchases a qualifying commercial or industrial property pays stamp duty  and the property enters CIP Tax regime. If the property is converted to a non-qualifying use (ie. residential) and continues to be used for that use as at the liability date for CIP Tax for a given tax year, the owner will not be liable for the CIP Tax for that tax year.


If the owner sells the property whilst it has a non-qualifying use (ie. residential), stamp duty will be payable.


If a property that has CIP Tax regime is sold a second or subsequent time with a qualifying commercial or industrial use, stamp duty would not be payable on the transaction. However, if this property is subsequently converted to a non-qualifying use (e.g. residential) then change-of-use duty would apply.


Change-of-use duty is intended to apply where no stamp duty was paid on a recent property transaction, but the property is also no longer liable for the CIP Tax.


The change-of-use duty will be calculated based on the stamp duty that would have been payable when the property was transacted, including any relevant concessions, but reduced by 10% for every 31 December that has passed since that transaction, to a maximum of 100%.


For example, if change-of-use duty was payable seven years after the property was transacted, then the change-of-use duty payable would be equal to 30% of the duty that would have been payable at the time the property was transacted.


Property owners need to notify the Victorian State Revenue Office (SRO) within 30 days of any change of use of a property.


Importance of maintaining records


This new regime underlines how important it will be for taxpayers to maintain detailed records of all land dealings in Victoria including the type of use, timing of any disposals and acquisitions, and any different titles for subdivisions and land consolidations.


Comprehensive documentation will be very beneficial to respond to any enquiries by the Victorian SRO and to support any future due diligence enquiries.



Please do not hesitate to contact your Lowe Lippmann Relationship Partner if you wish to discuss any of these matters further.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation


September 4, 2026
Yesterday, Treasurer Jim Chalmers released draft legislation to implement the key components of the 30% minimum trust tax on discretionary trusts announced in the Federal Budget during May 2026.
September 2, 2026
Discretionary trusts and the proposed 30% minimum tax Discretionary trusts, often referred to as family trusts, have been a popular structure for Australian families and businesses for many decades. They are commonly used to operate family businesses, hold investments and assist with succession planning. Their flexibility, together with asset protection and estate planning benefits, has made them an attractive option for many groups. In the 2026–27 Federal Budget, the Government announced a significant proposed change. From 1 July 2028 , trustees of discretionary trusts would generally be required to pay a minimum tax of 30% on the trust's taxable income . According to the Government, the proposal is intended to better align the tax paid on trust income with that paid by salary and wage earners, while reducing opportunities to split income between family members. However, the announcement has generated considerable debate. Professional bodies, business groups and tax advisers have expressed concerns that the changes could increase complexity and compliance costs for many genuine family businesses and investment structures. How the proposal is expected to work Under the proposal, the trustee would generally pay the minimum 30% tax on the trust's taxable income. Where trust income is distributed to individual beneficiaries or certain other non-corporate beneficiaries , those beneficiaries would generally receive a non-refundable tax offset recognising the tax already paid by the trustee. This is intended to reduce the risk of the same income being taxed twice, but while maintaining the impact of the 30% minimum tax rate. Importantly, the minimum tax would not apply to every trust . The Government has indicated that a number of trusts would be excluded, including fixed trusts, widely held trusts, complying superannuation funds, charitable trusts, deceased estates, special disability trusts and genuine testamentary trusts. Primary production income and certain income relating to vulnerable minors would also be excluded. The Government has also stated that more than 90% of small businesses are not expected to be affected. While that may be reassuring for some taxpayers, there are still some important issues that could affect family groups using discretionary trusts. What could this mean in practice? One area likely to receive close attention is the use of companies as beneficiaries of family trusts. Many family groups have historically distributed some trust income to a company. This can provide flexibility in managing cash flow, retaining profits within the business and funding future growth. Under the proposed rules, however, the corporate beneficiary would not receive a tax offset for the tax already paid by the trustee . In many cases this will mean that income distributed from a discretionary trust to a company would be subject to double taxation. Another practical impact of the proposed change is that some family groups may find it more difficult to fully utilise existing tax losses. While the impact will depend on each group's circumstances, the proposed minimum tax is likely to reduce some of the flexibility that currently exists when managing taxable income across a family structure within many groups. The Government has also proposed a temporary three-year rollover period, commencing from 1 July 2027, to help restructure into alternative business structures , such as companies or fixed trusts, without triggering immediate income tax or capital gains tax consequences. While this may assist some groups, restructuring is rarely straightforward. Depending on the circumstances, it might be necessary to consider things like stamp duty, loan approvals, financing arrangements, contract changes, licensing requirements and professional advice. Even relatively simple restructures can involve significant time and cost, so careful planning will be important. The rules are not yet final At this stage, the proposal remains subject to consultation . Treasury released a consultation paper in July 2026 seeking feedback on a range of design issues, including how the new rules would operate in different situations. Final legislation has not yet been introduced , meaning aspects of the proposal could still change before the rules become law. For this reason, most groups utilising discretionary trust structures should avoid making major structural decisions based solely on the announcement. Instead, it is sensible to monitor developments while considering whether existing structures are likely to remain appropriate if the proposal proceeds. What should you do now? For many families, discretionary trusts are about much more than tax. They can continue to provide valuable asset protection, succession planning and business flexibility. The proposed changes do not remove those benefits, nor do they prevent discretionary trusts from continuing to be used. However, the proposal does have the potential to change the tax outcomes for some family groups, particularly those with more complex structures or those that regularly distribute income to companies. With the proposed start date still some time away, there is an opportunity to pause and carefully understand how the changes may affect your circumstances and consider whether any planning or restructuring might be appropriate. As the legislation develops, we can help you assess the impact on your business or investment structure and determine whether any action is warranted.
August 4, 2026
Government to permanently extend $20,000 instant asset write-off The Government has recently introduced legislation that would make the $20,000 instant asset write-off permanent for small businesses (as announced in the 2026 Federal Budget). If enacted, the changes would: permanently set the instant asset write-off threshold at $20,000 (instead of $1,000) for eligible depreciating assets first used, or installed ready for use, for a taxable purpose from 1 July 2026; and permanently set the general small business pool threshold at $20,000 from 1 July 2026. The changes would also further suspend the 'lock-out rule' until 30 June 2027. This rule otherwise prevents a business that has chosen not to use the simplified depreciation rules from re-entering the regime for five years.
More Posts