Audit Lowe Down – Are Special Purpose Financial Statements Still Acceptable for For-Profit Entities?

Lowe Lippmann Chartered Accountants

Are Special Purpose Financial Statements Still Acceptable for For-Profit Entities?


The financial reporting landscape in Australia has seen significant changes over the last few years, particularly in the acceptability of special purpose financial statements (SPFS) for for-profit entities. Historically, many for-profit entities prepared SPFS to meet specific needs without adopting the full suite recognition, measurement and disclosure requirements of accounting standards.


We continue to receive lots of questions about whether for-profit entities can continue to prepare special purpose financial statements.


The AASB introduced new requirements for assessing whether a for-profit, private sector entity needs to prepare general purpose financial statements through amendments released in AASB 2020-2 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards – Removal of Special Purpose Financial Statements for Certain For Profit Private Sector Entities.

In summary, from 30 June 2022,  a for-profit private sector entity must prepare general purpose financial if one of the following criteria is met – the entity complies with:

  • A legislative requirement to prepare financial statements in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards or accounting standards – this would include, for example Companies required to financial statements under the Corporations Act, e.g. all large proprietary companies, small foreign owned companies, public companies greater than $250k revenue OR
  • A constituting or other document that requires the preparation of financial statements in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards. This might include documents such as constitution, trust deed, joint venture agreement, bank loan agreement. If this requirement exists and
  • the agreement was created / amended prior to 1 July 2021 then an entity can continue preparing special purpose financial statements with some extra disclosures
  • the document was created or amended after 1 July 2021 then then general purpose financial statements must be prepared.


While SPFS might still be permissible in specific cases, entities should evaluate whether their current financial statements are appropriate given the change in accounting standards.



Please do not hesitate to contact your Lowe Lippmann Relationship Partner if you wish to discuss any of these matters further.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation


October 13, 2025
In response to continuing criticism and significant industry feedback, Treasurer Jim Chalmers has announced substantial revisions to the proposed Division 296 tax. The government has decided not to apply the tax to unrealised capital gains on members superannuation balances above $3 million. The removal of the proposed unrealised capital gains tax is undoubtedly a welcome change. Division 296 was initially set to take effect from 1 July 2025. The revised proposal, effective from 1 July 2026, still imposes an additional tax but now only on realised investment earnings on the portion of a super balance above $3 million at a 30 percent tax rate To recover some of the lost tax revenue, the Treasurer announced a new 40 percent tax rate on earnings for balances exceeding $10 million. It is also anticipated that both tax thresholds will be indexed in line with the Transfer Balance Cap. We will provide more details and guidance on the new proposal as they become available.
October 3, 2025
ATO interest charges are no longer tax deductible – What you can do As we explained in our Practice Update for September, general interest charge ( GIC ) and shortfall interest charge ( SIC ) imposed by the ATO is no longer tax-deductible from 1 July 2025. This applies regardless of whether the underlying tax debt relates to past or future income years. With GIC currently at 11.17%, this is now one of the most expensive forms of finance in the market — and unlike in the past, you won’t get a deduction to offset the cost. For many taxpayers, this makes relying on an ATO payment plan a costly strategy. Refinancing ATO debt Businesses can sometimes refinance tax debts with a bank or other lender. Unlike GIC and SIC amounts, interest on these loans might be deductible for tax purposes, provided the borrowing is connected to business activities. While tax debts will sometimes relate to income tax or CGT liabilities, remember that interest could also be deductible where money is borrowed to pay other tax debts relating to a business, such as: GST; PAYG instalments; PAYG withholding for employees; and FBT. However, before taking any action to refinance ATO debt it is important to carefully consider whether you will be able to deduct the interest expenses or not. Individuals If you are an individual with a tax debt, the treatment of interest expenses incurred on a loan used to pay that tax debt really depends on the extent to which the tax debt arose from a business activity: Sole traders: If you are genuinely carrying on a business, interest on borrowings used to pay tax debts from that business is generally deductible. Employees or investors: If your tax debt relates to salary, wages, rental income, dividends, or other investment income, the interest is not deductible. Refinancing may still reduce overall interest costs depending on the interest rate on the new loan, but it won’t generate a tax deduction.
September 9, 2025
Costs incurred in acquiring / forming a business. Further to the recent blog about capitalisation of costs when acquiring an asset, we have received a number of questions in relation to costs incurred in setting up / purchasing a business. Formation costs on establishing a business: These costs would include: Incorporation fees ASIC registration fees Legal fees Business name registration Pre-operating costs Pre-opening costs. The relevant standard for these costs is AASB 138 Intangible Assets and paragraph 69a confirms that these start-up costs are expensed when incurred. There is no identifiable asset controlled by the entity when the costs are incurred as the entity does not exist. Business acquisition costs These costs would include: Legal and accounting fees Due diligence and valuation costs Stamp duty Advisory or brokerage fees Project management costs related to the acquisition Internal costs allocated to the transaction In contrast to the asset acquisition discussed previously, AASB 3 Business Combinations requires all acquisition costs to be expensed as incurred. This means that they are not included as part of the consideration paid and therefore do not affect calculated goodwill.  Entities purchasing businesses should be aware that these costs are not able to be capitalised as they can often be substantial, and purchasers often do not expect the costs to be taken directly to the income statement
More Posts