Audit Lowe Down – Are Special Purpose Financial Statements Still Acceptable for Not-For-Profit (NFP) Entities?

Lowe Lippmann Chartered Accountants

Are Special Purpose Financial Statements Still Acceptable for Not-For-Profit (NFP) Entities?


Following on from our post 23rd October 2024 which addressed special purpose financial statements in relation to for-profit entities, we have received a number of questions regarding the same topic for not-for-profit entities.


Not-for-profit entities may continue to choose to prepare Special Purpose Financial Statements (SPFS) if they assess themselves as non-reporting entities. Per Statement of Accounting Concepts 1 (SAC 1), a non-reporting entity is one where users, such as donors, members, creditors, or regulators, are not reliant on general-purpose financial reports for making decisions. This assessment is not static; it must be revisited annually by the governing body to ensure it remains accurate.


Although NFPs self-assess their reporting status, it is crucial to remember that there may be legislation governing financial statements which can vary depending on the type of entity, the State of incorporation and ACNC registration. For instance, SPFS prepared under the ACNC Act must comply with either:

  • The full presentation and disclosure requirements in the compulsory standards for SPFS listed in section 60.30 of the ACNC Regulations (AASB 101, AASB 107, AASB 108, AASB 124, AASB 1048, AASB 1054) or
  • the relevant paragraphs from AASB 1054 and AASB 1060 being paragraphs 8, 11, 14-103, 106-110, 189-203 of AASB 1060 and paragraphs 1 to 6, 9, 9A, 9B and 17 of AASB 1054.


The Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) is also developing a new Tier 3 standard specifically for smaller not-for-profits, we are expecting an exposure draft of the proposals by the end of 2024. This upcoming standard and proposed changes to the Conceptual Framework aims to simplify reporting requirements while mandating general purpose financial statements for more NFPs.


In conclusion, while SPFS might still be permissible, not-for-profits should carefully assess their reporting obligations and the needs of their users to ensure that your financial reporting remains relevant, compliant, and transparent while serving the best interests of your organisation and its stakeholders.


Monitoring the proposed developments from the AASB will allow you time to prepare for changes that might be needed.


Please do not hesitate to contact your Lowe Lippmann Relationship Partner if you wish to discuss any of these matters further.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation


Audit Lowe Down – Large proprietary limited – are you one? Tips and traps for your assessment

July 1, 2025
Large proprietary limited – are you one? Tips and traps for your assessment. In Australia, being classified as a large proprietary limited company means that you have to prepare, and lodge audited financial statements with ASIC under the Corporations Act 2001 (the Act), however many companies are not necessarily applying the thresholds appropriately. A proprietary company is large if it meets at least 2 of the following thresholds: Consolidated revenue ≥ $50 million Consolidated gross assets ≥ $25 million 100 or more employees. These thresholds seem simple, however some points to note: The calculations must be performed applying ALL accounting standards so even if you are preparing special purpose financial statements, then you will need to assess these thresholds as if you were applying all standards, including: AASB 16 Leases – this standard would add a right of use asset to your balance sheet potentially significantly increasing your gross assets. AASB 10 Consolidated Financial Statements – if you have controlled entities then the inclusion of their income statement and balance sheet may significantly increase each of the thresholds. AASB 128 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures / AASB 11 Joint Arrangements – if you have entities over which you have significant influence or joint control then applying equity accounting or including your share of assets and revenue would affect the thresholds. In determining the number of employees, the Act is clear that it is all full-time and part-time employees (on a pro-rata basis), however casual employees need to be considered. For example, are they genuinely casual with varying hours / shifts each week or are they in substance a permanent member of your team but just employed on a casual basis.  The thresholds need to be met at the end of the financial year and therefore entities should track their performance during the year so they are aware if they will meet the definition of a large proprietary company at year end.

Audit Lowe Down – Incorrect presentation of your liabilities could significantly affect your balance sheet

June 17, 2025
In a previous blog, we discussed the changes to the accounting standards relating to classification of current / non-current liabilities on the balance sheet. We have been receiving a number of questions on this topic and have provided some practical scenarios below as well as some actions for you as we approach 30 June reporting dates.

Tax Alert - High Court special leave application granted to appeal Bendel Case decision

June 13, 2025
High Court special leave application granted to appeal Bendel Case decision The Australian Taxation Office has been granted special leave to appeal to the High Court from the Full Federal Court decision in FCT v Bendel [2025] FCAFC 15. During March 2025 we released a Tax Alert ( see here ) explaining the current view of the ATO following the Full Federal Court decision that an unpaid present entitlement (or UPE) owed by a discretionary trust to a corporate beneficiary is not a “loan” for Division 7A purposes. The ATO also issued an Interim Decision Impact Statement ( see here ) in response to the Full Federal Court decision, providing information for taxpayers and advisers in relation to the details of the case and issues decided by the court.
More Posts