Audit Lowe Down – Contracts often include price variations relating to bonuses / penalties / rebates – why do we need to consider these early?

Lowe Lippmann Chartered Accountants

Contracts often include price variations relating to bonuses / penalties / rebates – why do we need to consider these early?


Many revenue streams are covered by AASB 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The core principle of this standard is ‘that an entity shall recognise revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.’ [emphasis added].


To determine what we expect to receive, all elements of the contract that are not fixed need to be reviewed. We need to review contracts for:

  • Volume discounts
  • Rebates
  • Refunds
  • Performance bonuses
  • Penalties
  • Price concessions

Once we have identified variable consideration then we need to estimate the amount expected to be received using either:

  • the expected amount using a probability weighted average of the likely outcomes or
  • the most likely outcome.

The method chosen is the one deemed to be the best estimate of the expected consideration, and the amounts may be updated at each reporting date.


Once the consideration has been determined, the entity recognises only the revenue that is highly probable will occur – this is known as the constraint on revenue recognition.


Practically, the requirements discussed above for variable consideration are relevant only where an entity satisfies the requirements for revenue recognition over time and contract crosses a reporting date.


As the estimate of the variable consideration changes, there may need to be a catch-up adjustment on previous revenue recognition for that contract.



Please do not hesitate to contact your Lowe Lippmann Relationship Partner if you wish to discuss any of these matters further.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation


November 2, 2025
Treasury announced new changes to Division 296 from 1 July 2026 During October the Treasurer announced some key changes to the proposed Division 296 tax measure to deal with some of the more contentious features of this proposed new tax. The Government is planning to make a number of significant changes to the way this tax will apply, including moving from a total superannuation balance change methodology to a fund-level realised-earnings approach and introducing a second threshold of $10 million, with CPI indexing applying to both thresholds. The Government also announced that the start date for the new Division 296 tax will be deferred to 1 July 2026 to allow further consultation and implementation work. For a full explanation of the announced new changes, see our Tax Alert ( click here ).
October 19, 2025
Further guidance on proposed changes to Division 296 from 1 July 2026 Earlier this week, we released a Tax Alert ( click here ) after the Government announced some significant changes to the proposed superannuation rules to increase the concessional tax rate from 15% to an effective 30% rate on earnings on total superannuation balances ( TSB ) over $3 million – known as Division 296. These proposed superannuation rules were set to commence on 1 July 2025, but the Government has now announced significant changes that will delay the start date until 1 July 2026 and apply to the 2026-27 financial year onwards.
October 13, 2025
In response to continuing criticism and significant industry feedback, Treasurer Jim Chalmers has announced substantial revisions to the proposed Division 296 tax. The government has decided not to apply the tax to unrealised capital gains on members superannuation balances above $3 million. The removal of the proposed unrealised capital gains tax is undoubtedly a welcome change. Division 296 was initially set to take effect from 1 July 2025. The revised proposal, effective from 1 July 2026, still imposes an additional tax but now only on realised investment earnings on the portion of a super balance above $3 million at a 30 percent tax rate To recover some of the lost tax revenue, the Treasurer announced a new 40 percent tax rate on earnings for balances exceeding $10 million. It is also anticipated that both tax thresholds will be indexed in line with the Transfer Balance Cap. We will provide more details and guidance on the new proposal as they become available.
More Posts