Audit Lowe Down – IFRS 15 Post-Implementation Review (PIR): What Did We Learn?

Lowe Lippmann Chartered Accountants

The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) recently concluded its Post-Implementation Review (PIR) of IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers. This is relevant in Australia since we have adopted this standard as AASB 15.


The PIR overall conclusion is that the five-step model has improved comparability in financial reporting and is generally well understood by stakeholders.


However, the review highlighted some areas that still pose challenges for certain sectors, particularly with complex contracts, variable consideration, and the balance between principles-based guidance and specific application issues.


Regardless of these areas, there are no major amendments to IFRS 15 expected, but the IASB will continue to monitor areas where further clarification could help entities better apply the standard.


We continue to see clients who have not fully understood the requirements of AASB 15 and therefore we encourage regular reviews of sales contract against the requirements of the standard to ensure appropriate revenue recognition methodology is being applied.


For our not-for-profit clients, the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) PIR of AASB 1058 Income of NFP Entities and the interaction with AASB 15 is still ongoing, however we are not expecting to see any significant amendments arising from this project.



Please do not hesitate to contact your Lowe Lippmann Relationship Partner if you wish to discuss any of these matters further.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation


July 1, 2025
Large proprietary limited – are you one? Tips and traps for your assessment. In Australia, being classified as a large proprietary limited company means that you have to prepare, and lodge audited financial statements with ASIC under the Corporations Act 2001 (the Act), however many companies are not necessarily applying the thresholds appropriately. A proprietary company is large if it meets at least 2 of the following thresholds: Consolidated revenue ≥ $50 million Consolidated gross assets ≥ $25 million 100 or more employees. These thresholds seem simple, however some points to note: The calculations must be performed applying ALL accounting standards so even if you are preparing special purpose financial statements, then you will need to assess these thresholds as if you were applying all standards, including: AASB 16 Leases – this standard would add a right of use asset to your balance sheet potentially significantly increasing your gross assets. AASB 10 Consolidated Financial Statements – if you have controlled entities then the inclusion of their income statement and balance sheet may significantly increase each of the thresholds. AASB 128 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures / AASB 11 Joint Arrangements – if you have entities over which you have significant influence or joint control then applying equity accounting or including your share of assets and revenue would affect the thresholds. In determining the number of employees, the Act is clear that it is all full-time and part-time employees (on a pro-rata basis), however casual employees need to be considered. For example, are they genuinely casual with varying hours / shifts each week or are they in substance a permanent member of your team but just employed on a casual basis.  The thresholds need to be met at the end of the financial year and therefore entities should track their performance during the year so they are aware if they will meet the definition of a large proprietary company at year end.
June 17, 2025
In a previous blog, we discussed the changes to the accounting standards relating to classification of current / non-current liabilities on the balance sheet. We have been receiving a number of questions on this topic and have provided some practical scenarios below as well as some actions for you as we approach 30 June reporting dates.
June 13, 2025
High Court special leave application granted to appeal Bendel Case decision The Australian Taxation Office has been granted special leave to appeal to the High Court from the Full Federal Court decision in FCT v Bendel [2025] FCAFC 15. During March 2025 we released a Tax Alert ( see here ) explaining the current view of the ATO following the Full Federal Court decision that an unpaid present entitlement (or UPE) owed by a discretionary trust to a corporate beneficiary is not a “loan” for Division 7A purposes. The ATO also issued an Interim Decision Impact Statement ( see here ) in response to the Full Federal Court decision, providing information for taxpayers and advisers in relation to the details of the case and issues decided by the court.
More Posts