JobKeeper Payments Expanded to include Religious Practitioners

Generally, religious practitioners may not be classified as "employees" for tax purposes, and may receive financial support via non monetary benefits and/or a stipend, rather than salary and wages.

The eligibility rules for the JobKeeper Payment scheme have now been expanded to include religious institutions in respect of religious practitioners (with the exception of those that are students only) who are impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.

What is a "Registered Religious Institution"?

A "registered religious institution" means an institution that is a registered charity and registered as a charity that is advancing religion under the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission Act 2012.

Who is a "Religious Practitioner"?

A "religious practitioner" for the purposes of the JobKeeper Payment scheme is a minister of religion or a full-time member of a religious order.

The expanded eligibility requirements provide that individuals are eligible religious practitioners in a fortnight if they meet all of the following in that fortnight :

They are not employed by the religious institution;
They are a religious practitioner and they do activities or a series of activities in pursuit of their vocation as a religious practitioner, and as a member of the registered religious institution;
They meet the 1 March 2020 requirements; and
They meet the nomination requirements (explained below).

The eligibility requirements for religious practitioners are largely consistent with those for other employees (ie. the 1 March 2020 requirements), and we have explained these requirements in a previous Tax Alert – click here .

Payment Condition for Religious Institutions

A payment condition applies to an eligible religious institution concerning payments or benefits provided to a religious practitioner to qualify for the JobKeeper Payment scheme in respect of the religious practitioner.

The expanded rules provide that an eligible religious institution meets the payment condition in respect of an individual for a fortnight if it:

Makes one or more payments to the individual from which an amount must be withheld (ie. PAYG withholding); or
Provides a benefit to the individual whether that is a fringe benefit or an exempt benefit under the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986.

We understand that where a religious practitioner is normally paid a salary (and/or has expenses paid on their behalf by the religious institution, ie. fringe benefits) and they have assessed they are entitled to receive the JobKeeper Payment, they will meet the payment condition where they continue to receive a salary (and/or fringe benefits) to the value of $1,500 (gross) per fortnight.

We also note that where an institution usually pays religious practitioners for a regular period of more than a fortnight (such as monthly), then those payments are to be allocated to a fortnight or fortnights in a reasonable manner.

Special Nomination Notice

If you have enrolled or intend to enrol for the JobKeeper Payment, you need to complete the JobKeeper religious practitioner nomination notice ( click here) to:

Notify your eligible religious practitioners that you intend to participate in the scheme; and
Confirm they agree to be nominated and receive payments from you as part of the scheme.

Both the registered religious institution and the nominated religious practitioner need to complete the form. The completed form does not need to be sent to the ATO, however it should be kept as part of your tax records.

Please do not hesitate to contact your Lowe Lippmann Relationship Partner if you wish to discuss any of these matters further.

< Older Post

Newer Post >

Tax Alert - High Court decision and ATO statement on Bendel’s Case

July 7, 2026

High Court decision and ATO statement on Bendel’s Case The High Court recently handed down its decision in Bendel’s Case, confirming that an unpaid present entitlement (or UPE) between a discretionary trust and a beneficiary company does not fall within the extended definition of a “loan” for Division 7A purposes. The Australian Taxation Office released a Decision Impact Statement in response to the High Court findings, concluding the High Court's reasoning makes it clear that where a beneficiary company is entitled to a share of trust income that remains unpaid (a UPE) and the company takes no positive actions to call for payment of the entitlement, this will not fall within the expanded definition of a "loan" for Division 7A purposes. This is in contradiction to the ATO’s historical position that treated UPEs as "loans".

Practice Update – July 2026

July 5, 2026

Government's tax reform package The Government has recently legislated several of the tax reform measures announced in the 2026 Federal Budget (and in later media releases). These include, among other things: Replacing the CGT discount with cost base indexation and a 30% minimum tax on gains accruing from 1 July 2027 (including gains on pre-CGT assets); Increasing the small business turnover threshold for the 50% active asset reduction from $2 million to $10 million; Limiting negative gearing for residential property to new residential dwellings from 1 July 2027 (subject to transitional rules); and Introducing the Working Australians Tax Offset from 1 July 2027, and the $1,000 instant tax deduction for work-related expenses from 1 July 2026. After a round of consultation, the Government has also announced further proposed measures, broadly including (among others): A new targeted CGT discount for investors in innovative start-ups; Barring SMSFs from utilising future limited recourse borrowing arrangements ( LRBAs ) to acquire residential property; and Exempting income of discretionary testamentary trusts from the minimum tax proposed for trusts. We recently released a Tax Alert considering the legislation restricting SMSFFs using residential property LRBAs – to read click here . For full details of each of the 2026 Federal Budget announcements, please see our Federal Budget Tax Alert – to read click here .

Tax Alert - Legislation restricting SMSFs using residential property LRBAs has now passed Parliament

June 28, 2026

Legislation restricting SMSFs using residential property LRBAs has now passed Parliament The Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No 1) Bill 2026 ( the Reform No 1 Bill ) was passed by Parliament on Thursday 25 June 2026. Schedule 5 of the Reform No 1 Bill amends section 67A of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 to restrict future limited recourse borrowing arrangements ( LRBAs ) on real property to investments in “business real property” (as defined in section 66 of the SIS Act). Residential property of any kind is excluded from the definition of “business real property” in section 66 of the SIS Act. We note this also excludes newly constructed residential property, which is a distinction at odds with recent exemptions being given to new-builds with other Budget Night tax changes relating to negative gearing and restricting the CGT 50% discount. Super funds are not generally allowed to borrow for investments, but there has been a concession allowing a self-managed super fund ( SMSF ) to borrow money to buy single assets like property, if their loans were set up in line with particular requirements, known as LRBAs. This change means an SMSF will not be able to borrow to buy residential property after the start date of these changes.