Practice Update – August 2026

Lowe Lippmann Chartered Accountants

Government to permanently extend $20,000 instant asset write-off


The Government has recently introduced legislation that would make the $20,000 instant asset write-off permanent for small businesses (as announced in the 2026 Federal Budget).


If enacted, the changes would:


  • permanently set the instant asset write-off threshold at $20,000 (instead of $1,000) for eligible depreciating assets first used, or installed ready for use, for a taxable purpose from 1 July 2026; and
  • permanently set the general small business pool threshold at $20,000 from 1 July 2026.


The changes would also further suspend the 'lock-out rule' until 30 June 2027. This rule otherwise prevents a business that has chosen not to use the simplified depreciation rules from re-entering the regime for five years.


Government to re-introduce loss carry back for companies


The Government has also recently introduced legislation to re-introduce the 'loss carry back' measure for companies from 1 July 2026.


If enacted, this will allow most companies to carry back a tax loss and apply it against tax paid in either, or both, of the previous two income years, basically giving rise to a tax refund for the loss year.


ATO warning on home occupancy expense claims


The ATO has identified that some taxpayers are incorrectly claiming rent, mortgage interest and other occupancy expenses as part of their work-from-home expenses.


To claim occupancy expenses, a taxpayer must be able to demonstrate that:


  • the area of their home they used for work purposes is a 'place of business';
  • if they are an employee, it was necessary for them to work from home because their employer did not provide an alternative 'place of business' to work from; and
  • the nature of their income-earning activities requires them to have a 'place of business'.


Factors that may indicate whether an area has the character of a 'place of business' include whether the area is:


  • clearly identifiable as a 'place of business';
  • not readily capable of private or domestic use;
  • exclusively or almost exclusively used for carrying on a business; and
  • used regularly for client or customer visits.


Taxpayers who are eligible to claim occupancy expenses can claim a portion of those expenses based on floor area, the period they worked from home, and their ownership of the property.


New restrictions on LRBAs


Recently enacted legislation imposes new restrictions on the use of limited recourse borrowing arrangements ('LRBAs') by SMSFs.


LRBAs entered into on or after 10 August 2026 to purchase real property can now only be used to acquire business real property.


These changes do not apply if an SMSF:


  • has already entered into an LRBA to finance a real property acquisition before 10 August 2026; or
  • maintains or refinances that LRBA on or after 10 August 2026.


'Business real property' generally means land and buildings used wholly and exclusively in one or more businesses.


We recently released a Tax Alert considering the legislation restricting SMSFs using residential property LRBAs – to read click here.


ATO warning on property manager reports


The ATO is warning rental property owners that expenses shown in property manager reports may not always be classified correctly for income tax purposes.


Common issues identified by the ATO include:


  • capital expenses, including initial repairs, being claimed as current-year deductions;
  • expenses being grouped together without sufficient detail to determine how they should be treated;
  • discrepancies in accounting methods used when expenses are actually incurred versus when they are paid; and
  • private expenses incorrectly included, such as costs relating to the owners’ personal use of the property.

Division 7A benchmark interest rate


The ATO has published a Division 7A benchmark interest rate of 8.77% for the income year ending 30 June 2027, up from 8.37% for the previous income year.



The benchmark interest rate is applied when calculating minimum yearly repayments (MYRs) for complying Division 7A loans.


ATO electoral roll data-matching program


The ATO is obtaining Australian electoral roll information from the Australian Electoral Commission as part of its ongoing data-matching program.



The information will be compared with the ATO’s existing records to identify non-compliance with tax and superannuation obligations.


The data collected may include registered voters’ names, residential addresses, sex, dates of birth and occupations. 


The ATO estimates it will receive records relating to approximately 18 million individuals each quarter.


ATO scam warning


The ATO has received concerning reports of a new email impersonation scam claiming to be from the ATO. The email states that a phone appointment with the ATO has been scheduled and includes appointment details such as the date and time.


The email claims that recipients must open an attachment included in the email to securely access relevant services or reschedule the appointment. The attachment contains a link to a legitimate looking myGov sign-in page designed to steal usernames, passwords and other personal information.


The ATO has confirmed that it will never:



  • email an attachment containing a link to a myGov sign-in page;
  • ask recipients to access ATO services through links in unsolicited emails;
  • direct recipients to a login page that is not hosted on an official myGov or ATO website; or
  • request a myGov username, password or security code via email.


The ATO has advised recipients not to respond to the email or interact with it in any way.



Please do not hesitate to contact your Lowe Lippmann Relationship Partner if you wish to discuss any of these matters further.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation


September 4, 2026
Yesterday, Treasurer Jim Chalmers released draft legislation to implement the key components of the 30% minimum trust tax on discretionary trusts announced in the Federal Budget during May 2026.
September 2, 2026
Discretionary trusts and the proposed 30% minimum tax Discretionary trusts, often referred to as family trusts, have been a popular structure for Australian families and businesses for many decades. They are commonly used to operate family businesses, hold investments and assist with succession planning. Their flexibility, together with asset protection and estate planning benefits, has made them an attractive option for many groups. In the 2026–27 Federal Budget, the Government announced a significant proposed change. From 1 July 2028 , trustees of discretionary trusts would generally be required to pay a minimum tax of 30% on the trust's taxable income . According to the Government, the proposal is intended to better align the tax paid on trust income with that paid by salary and wage earners, while reducing opportunities to split income between family members. However, the announcement has generated considerable debate. Professional bodies, business groups and tax advisers have expressed concerns that the changes could increase complexity and compliance costs for many genuine family businesses and investment structures. How the proposal is expected to work Under the proposal, the trustee would generally pay the minimum 30% tax on the trust's taxable income. Where trust income is distributed to individual beneficiaries or certain other non-corporate beneficiaries , those beneficiaries would generally receive a non-refundable tax offset recognising the tax already paid by the trustee. This is intended to reduce the risk of the same income being taxed twice, but while maintaining the impact of the 30% minimum tax rate. Importantly, the minimum tax would not apply to every trust . The Government has indicated that a number of trusts would be excluded, including fixed trusts, widely held trusts, complying superannuation funds, charitable trusts, deceased estates, special disability trusts and genuine testamentary trusts. Primary production income and certain income relating to vulnerable minors would also be excluded. The Government has also stated that more than 90% of small businesses are not expected to be affected. While that may be reassuring for some taxpayers, there are still some important issues that could affect family groups using discretionary trusts. What could this mean in practice? One area likely to receive close attention is the use of companies as beneficiaries of family trusts. Many family groups have historically distributed some trust income to a company. This can provide flexibility in managing cash flow, retaining profits within the business and funding future growth. Under the proposed rules, however, the corporate beneficiary would not receive a tax offset for the tax already paid by the trustee . In many cases this will mean that income distributed from a discretionary trust to a company would be subject to double taxation. Another practical impact of the proposed change is that some family groups may find it more difficult to fully utilise existing tax losses. While the impact will depend on each group's circumstances, the proposed minimum tax is likely to reduce some of the flexibility that currently exists when managing taxable income across a family structure within many groups. The Government has also proposed a temporary three-year rollover period, commencing from 1 July 2027, to help restructure into alternative business structures , such as companies or fixed trusts, without triggering immediate income tax or capital gains tax consequences. While this may assist some groups, restructuring is rarely straightforward. Depending on the circumstances, it might be necessary to consider things like stamp duty, loan approvals, financing arrangements, contract changes, licensing requirements and professional advice. Even relatively simple restructures can involve significant time and cost, so careful planning will be important. The rules are not yet final At this stage, the proposal remains subject to consultation . Treasury released a consultation paper in July 2026 seeking feedback on a range of design issues, including how the new rules would operate in different situations. Final legislation has not yet been introduced , meaning aspects of the proposal could still change before the rules become law. For this reason, most groups utilising discretionary trust structures should avoid making major structural decisions based solely on the announcement. Instead, it is sensible to monitor developments while considering whether existing structures are likely to remain appropriate if the proposal proceeds. What should you do now? For many families, discretionary trusts are about much more than tax. They can continue to provide valuable asset protection, succession planning and business flexibility. The proposed changes do not remove those benefits, nor do they prevent discretionary trusts from continuing to be used. However, the proposal does have the potential to change the tax outcomes for some family groups, particularly those with more complex structures or those that regularly distribute income to companies. With the proposed start date still some time away, there is an opportunity to pause and carefully understand how the changes may affect your circumstances and consider whether any planning or restructuring might be appropriate. As the legislation develops, we can help you assess the impact on your business or investment structure and determine whether any action is warranted.
July 7, 2026
High Court decision and ATO statement on Bendel’s Case The High Court recently handed down its decision in Bendel’s Case, confirming that an unpaid present entitlement (or UPE) between a discretionary trust and a beneficiary company does not fall within the extended definition of a “loan” for Division 7A purposes. The Australian Taxation Office released a Decision Impact Statement in response to the High Court findings, concluding the High Court's reasoning makes it clear that where a beneficiary company is entitled to a share of trust income that remains unpaid (a UPE) and the company takes no positive actions to call for payment of the entitlement, this will not fall within the expanded definition of a "loan" for Division 7A purposes. This is in contradiction to the ATO’s historical position that treated UPEs as "loans".
More Posts