Tax Alert - Draft legislation offers alternative to restructuring and avoid the 30% minimum trust tax

Lowe Lippmann Chartered Accountants

Yesterday, Treasurer Jim Chalmers released draft legislation to implement the key components of the 30% minimum trust tax on discretionary trusts announced in the Federal Budget during May 2026.


Election option

 

As an alternative to restructuring, the draft legislation outlines a new option for any discretionary trust existing at 1 July 2028, the trustee will be able to make an election to make fixed distributions of 100% of both income and capital of the trust to “pre-nominated beneficiaries”. It is proposed that each beneficiary must receive the same percentage of income and capital.

 

We note that the trust deed must allow the trustee to confer income and capital entitlements in the nominated manner, and therefore the trust deed will need to be reviewed prior to making any election.

 

The election will allow the trustee to nominate an unlimited number of beneficiaries that will be entitled to benefit under the trust from 1 July 2028 and can include individuals, companies or other trusts. The trust will then be known as an “excluded election trust”.

 

The beneficiary would then pay tax on that trust distribution based on their marginal tax rate (for individuals) or at the relevant corporate tax rate (for companies), instead of the trustee of the trust paying the proposed 30% minimum trust tax. This option is an alternative to restructure roll over relief concession announced in the original guidance.

 

Conversely, if the discretionary trust does not elect to make fixed distributions to “pre-nominated beneficiaries”, the trust will have the option to restructure into an alternative entity to avoid paying the 30% minimum trust tax. We note that any restructure event will have professional services costs (ie. accountants and/or lawyers), in addition to potentially incurring any state or territory stamp duty where assets (such as real property) are transferred to the new entity.

 

Once the election is made, “pre-nominated beneficiaries” could only be added or changed in certain circumstances, for example if a beneficiary dies or there is a family breakdown. The trustee can voluntarily revoke the election, which will result in the trustee of the discretionary trust being assessed under the proposed 30% minimum trust tax.

 

The election may be automatically revoked if the trustee breaches the election by making trust distributions inconsistent with the election (ie. distributions made to any beneficiaries not nominated in the election). In these circumstances, the trustee would be taxed on any “breaching distribution” at the top marginal tax rate plus the medicare levy (ie. 47%).


A new definition of fixed trust


The Government has made it clear that fixed trusts and widely held trusts will be excluded from the 30% minimum trust tax on discretionary trust income.

 

A new fixed trust definition will be introduced, which will be applied more broadly for income tax law purposes.  It will ensure that a trust can be considered a fixed trust if there are no material discretionary elements affecting the entitlements or rights of the trust’s beneficiaries.

 

The new definition will ensure that trusts such as bare trusts, managed investment trusts and other widely held trusts are not subject to the 30% minimum trust tax.


Refunds for excess franking credits


After the trustee has offset its income tax liabilities, they will be entitled to obtain refunds for franking credits that remain and relate to income subject to the 30% minimum trust tax.

 

The tax treatment of corporation distributions flowing through trusts that do not relate to income subject to the 30% minimum trust tax will be unaffected.


Our first thoughts?

 

This election option may suit a family group that has high level of certainty over their long-term trust distributions, which are generally settled and are unlikely to change. 

 

However, the election appears less appropriate for a family group that is uncertain of their long-term trust distribution patterns and wants to maintain some flexibility for discretionary succession planning, asset protection or anticipates beneficiaries will change over time.

 

The draft legislation is currently open for consultation until 18 September 2026. Once the legislation is finalised we will provide further updates to clarify any changes and consider the best way forward under the proposed new rules.


Please do not hesitate to contact your Lowe Lippmann Relationship Partner if you wish to discuss any of these matters further.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation


September 2, 2026
Discretionary trusts and the proposed 30% minimum tax Discretionary trusts, often referred to as family trusts, have been a popular structure for Australian families and businesses for many decades. They are commonly used to operate family businesses, hold investments and assist with succession planning. Their flexibility, together with asset protection and estate planning benefits, has made them an attractive option for many groups. In the 2026–27 Federal Budget, the Government announced a significant proposed change. From 1 July 2028 , trustees of discretionary trusts would generally be required to pay a minimum tax of 30% on the trust's taxable income . According to the Government, the proposal is intended to better align the tax paid on trust income with that paid by salary and wage earners, while reducing opportunities to split income between family members. However, the announcement has generated considerable debate. Professional bodies, business groups and tax advisers have expressed concerns that the changes could increase complexity and compliance costs for many genuine family businesses and investment structures. How the proposal is expected to work Under the proposal, the trustee would generally pay the minimum 30% tax on the trust's taxable income. Where trust income is distributed to individual beneficiaries or certain other non-corporate beneficiaries , those beneficiaries would generally receive a non-refundable tax offset recognising the tax already paid by the trustee. This is intended to reduce the risk of the same income being taxed twice, but while maintaining the impact of the 30% minimum tax rate. Importantly, the minimum tax would not apply to every trust . The Government has indicated that a number of trusts would be excluded, including fixed trusts, widely held trusts, complying superannuation funds, charitable trusts, deceased estates, special disability trusts and genuine testamentary trusts. Primary production income and certain income relating to vulnerable minors would also be excluded. The Government has also stated that more than 90% of small businesses are not expected to be affected. While that may be reassuring for some taxpayers, there are still some important issues that could affect family groups using discretionary trusts. What could this mean in practice? One area likely to receive close attention is the use of companies as beneficiaries of family trusts. Many family groups have historically distributed some trust income to a company. This can provide flexibility in managing cash flow, retaining profits within the business and funding future growth. Under the proposed rules, however, the corporate beneficiary would not receive a tax offset for the tax already paid by the trustee . In many cases this will mean that income distributed from a discretionary trust to a company would be subject to double taxation. Another practical impact of the proposed change is that some family groups may find it more difficult to fully utilise existing tax losses. While the impact will depend on each group's circumstances, the proposed minimum tax is likely to reduce some of the flexibility that currently exists when managing taxable income across a family structure within many groups. The Government has also proposed a temporary three-year rollover period, commencing from 1 July 2027, to help restructure into alternative business structures , such as companies or fixed trusts, without triggering immediate income tax or capital gains tax consequences. While this may assist some groups, restructuring is rarely straightforward. Depending on the circumstances, it might be necessary to consider things like stamp duty, loan approvals, financing arrangements, contract changes, licensing requirements and professional advice. Even relatively simple restructures can involve significant time and cost, so careful planning will be important. The rules are not yet final At this stage, the proposal remains subject to consultation . Treasury released a consultation paper in July 2026 seeking feedback on a range of design issues, including how the new rules would operate in different situations. Final legislation has not yet been introduced , meaning aspects of the proposal could still change before the rules become law. For this reason, most groups utilising discretionary trust structures should avoid making major structural decisions based solely on the announcement. Instead, it is sensible to monitor developments while considering whether existing structures are likely to remain appropriate if the proposal proceeds. What should you do now? For many families, discretionary trusts are about much more than tax. They can continue to provide valuable asset protection, succession planning and business flexibility. The proposed changes do not remove those benefits, nor do they prevent discretionary trusts from continuing to be used. However, the proposal does have the potential to change the tax outcomes for some family groups, particularly those with more complex structures or those that regularly distribute income to companies. With the proposed start date still some time away, there is an opportunity to pause and carefully understand how the changes may affect your circumstances and consider whether any planning or restructuring might be appropriate. As the legislation develops, we can help you assess the impact on your business or investment structure and determine whether any action is warranted.
August 4, 2026
Government to permanently extend $20,000 instant asset write-off The Government has recently introduced legislation that would make the $20,000 instant asset write-off permanent for small businesses (as announced in the 2026 Federal Budget). If enacted, the changes would: permanently set the instant asset write-off threshold at $20,000 (instead of $1,000) for eligible depreciating assets first used, or installed ready for use, for a taxable purpose from 1 July 2026; and permanently set the general small business pool threshold at $20,000 from 1 July 2026. The changes would also further suspend the 'lock-out rule' until 30 June 2027. This rule otherwise prevents a business that has chosen not to use the simplified depreciation rules from re-entering the regime for five years.
July 7, 2026
High Court decision and ATO statement on Bendel’s Case The High Court recently handed down its decision in Bendel’s Case, confirming that an unpaid present entitlement (or UPE) between a discretionary trust and a beneficiary company does not fall within the extended definition of a “loan” for Division 7A purposes. The Australian Taxation Office released a Decision Impact Statement in response to the High Court findings, concluding the High Court's reasoning makes it clear that where a beneficiary company is entitled to a share of trust income that remains unpaid (a UPE) and the company takes no positive actions to call for payment of the entitlement, this will not fall within the expanded definition of a "loan" for Division 7A purposes. This is in contradiction to the ATO’s historical position that treated UPEs as "loans".
More Posts