Tax Alert - Recent changes to various Victorian state taxes

Lowe Lippmann Chartered Accountants

Recent updates for various Victorian state taxes


In recent weeks, we have seen some updates in relation to various Victorian state taxes, including:

  • Vacant Residential Land Tax – legislation received royal assent to extend the holiday home exemption to land owned by companies or trusts.
  • Payroll Tax – exemptions for certain general practitioners.
  • Commercial and Industrial Property Tax – legislation received royal assent and rules apply from 1 July 2024.


We will discuss the importance of each update in more detail.

Vacant Residential Land Tax holiday home exemption extended


The State Taxation Amendment Bill 2024 (Vic) has recently received royal assent and will amend the Land Tax Act 2005 (Vic), to extend the holiday home exemption within the Vacant Residential Land Tax (VRLT) rules to land owned by companies or trusts from 1 January 2025.


What is VRLT?


The VRLT is an annual tax imposed on residential properties in Victoria that are vacant for more than six months in a calendar year. VRLT is assessed at rate of 1.0% of the capital improved value of the land for the first year (2.0% for the second and 3.0% for the third consecutive years) and is payable to the Victorian State Revenue Office.


The catchment zone for the VRLT rules was expanded late last year (see our previous Tax Alert here) to include an owner of residential property anywhere in the State of Victoria that is vacant for more than six months between 1 January 2024 and 31 December 2024, unless an exemption applies.


An exemption applies where the owner (or a relative) has used and occupied the land as a holiday home for at least 4 weeks (whether continuous or aggregate) in the preceding land tax year ending 31 December.


What are the requirements of the holiday home exemption?


The Commissioner of State Revenue must be satisfied that the property was a genuine holiday home, having regard to its location and distance between the owner or vested beneficiary’s actual home and the holiday home, as well as the frequency and nature of its use. 


An owner or a vested beneficiary will only be able to claim one holiday home exemption in a calendar year.


The scope of the VRLT exemptions have now been extended to include land owned by a corporation or a trustee of a trust (other than a trust with a vested beneficiary) when certain requirements have been satisfied, including:

  • the owner of the land has been the owner of the land continuously since 28 November 2023, or since a later date if the owner became the owner at that date under a contract for the purchase of the land entered into on or before 28 November 2023;
  • there has been no change in beneficial ownership of the land since 28 November 2023, except for a change involving persons who are relatives of one another;
  • the minimum landholder threshold and principal place of residence (PPR) requirement must be satisfied;
  • in the year preceding the land tax year (ie. ending 31 December), the land has been used and occupied as a holiday home for a period of at least 4 weeks (whether continuous or aggregate) by a specified person; and
  • the Commissioner of State Revenue is satisfied that the land was used and occupied as a holiday home in the year preceding the tax year.


There are some important concepts we need to consider in more detail as part of these requirements.


A “change in beneficial ownership” can include changes in; shareholdings (in the case of a company), unit holdings (in the case of a unit trust), beneficial interests (in the case of a fixed trust) or specified beneficiaries (in the case of a discretionary trust). Where there has been a change, the VRLT exemption for holiday homes will only apply where the change is between persons who are relatives of one another. 


A “relative” within the meaning of the Land Tax Act 2005 (Vic) is rather narrowly defined and covers, among others, the spouse of the owner, as well as a sibling or child of either the owner or a spouse of a sibling and child.


The “minimum landholder threshold” requires a minimum ownership interest of 50.0% in the landowner (in the case of companies, unit trusts and fixed trusts) by one or more individual persons who must have used and occupied other land (ie. other than the holiday home in question) in Australia as a PPR. In other words, if a company/ unit trust/ fixed trust has a shareholder/ unitholder/ beneficiary that is a discretionary trust with a greater than 50.0% interest, then the “minimum landholder threshold” requirement can not be satisfied.


Specifically in the case of discretionary trust landholders, it requires a specified beneficiary of a discretionary trust who is a natural person or a relative of that person must have used and occupied other land in Australia as a PPR.


Does the holiday home exemption extend to contiguous land?


The exemption for holiday homes can also include separately titled residential land that is contiguous to a holiday home, in certain circumstances. To be exempt, the contiguous land must be owned by the owner of the holiday home land, it must enhance the holiday home land and must be used solely for the private benefit and enjoyment of the person who uses and occupies the holiday home land (ie. land used for a tennis court, swimming pool or garden). 


Contiguous land can be separated from the holiday home land, but only by a road or railway or other similar area where movement across or around is reasonably possible.


Why is there a stipulation for trusts “other than a trust with a vested beneficiary”?


It is not common for the holiday home exemption to apply to a vested beneficiary of a trust.  A vested beneficiary is a natural person who has a vested beneficial interest in possession in the land or is the principal beneficiary of a special disability trust.


The most common trusts that own holiday homes are likely to be discretionary or family trusts and these typically do not have property vested in a particular beneficiary.  While vesting a property in a natural person beneficiary may be possible, careful consideration is needed to avoid any adverse implications for income tax (including capital gains tax) and stamp duty implications.


What are the implications for self-managed superannuation funds?


Self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) are precluded from providing residential premises to their members or associates of the members.  Therefore, it is difficult to see how a SMSF could avail itself of the four weeks holiday home exemption. Indeed any such properties owned by a SMSF would need to be used for income producing purposes by letting out to unrelated parties on commercial terms and conditions.

Payroll Tax exemptions for certain general practitioners


The Victorian Government has announced that all Victorian general practitioner (GP) businesses will receive a retrospective exemption from any outstanding or future assessment issued for payroll tax on payments to contractor GPs for the period up to 30 June 2024.


A further 12-month exemption from payroll tax, through to 30 June 2025, will be available for any general practice business that has not already received advice and begun paying payroll tax on payments to their contractor GPs on this basis.


Also, a payroll tax exemption will be provided for payments to contractor GPs and to employee GPs for providing bulk-billed consultations from 1 July 2025.


These exemptions have been a welcomed reform to help reduce stress and pressure on Victorian clinics.


New South Wales, South Australia, Queensland, and the Australian Capital Territory have already announced amnesties or concessions, while Western Australia has confirmed it will not make payroll tax changes.

Commercial and Industrial Property Tax legislation received royal assent and rules apply from 1 July 2024


The Commercial and Industrial Property Tax Reform Bill 2024 (Vic) has now received royal assent and will establish a tax reform scheme for eligible Commercial and Industrial Property Tax (CIPT) from 1 July 2024.


Broadly, when land with a qualifying use is sold after 1 July 2024, it will transition into the new system with stamp duty payable one last time on that property.  After a transition period of 10 years starting on the date the land entered the scheme, CIPT will begin to apply to the land.


We have explained the details of the new CIPT in a previous Tax Alert – click here.


Please do not hesitate to contact your Lowe Lippmann Relationship Partner if you wish to discuss any of these matters further.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation


Audit Lowe Down – Costs incurred in acquiring / forming a business

September 9, 2025
Costs incurred in acquiring / forming a business. Further to the recent blog about capitalisation of costs when acquiring an asset, we have received a number of questions in relation to costs incurred in setting up / purchasing a business. Formation costs on establishing a business: These costs would include: Incorporation fees ASIC registration fees Legal fees Business name registration Pre-operating costs Pre-opening costs. The relevant standard for these costs is AASB 138 Intangible Assets and paragraph 69a confirms that these start-up costs are expensed when incurred. There is no identifiable asset controlled by the entity when the costs are incurred as the entity does not exist. Business acquisition costs These costs would include: Legal and accounting fees Due diligence and valuation costs Stamp duty Advisory or brokerage fees Project management costs related to the acquisition Internal costs allocated to the transaction In contrast to the asset acquisition discussed previously, AASB 3 Business Combinations requires all acquisition costs to be expensed as incurred. This means that they are not included as part of the consideration paid and therefore do not affect calculated goodwill.  Entities purchasing businesses should be aware that these costs are not able to be capitalised as they can often be substantial, and purchasers often do not expect the costs to be taken directly to the income statement

Practice Update – September 2025

September 8, 2025
ATO to include tax 'debts on hold' in taxpayer account balances From August 2025, the Australian Taxation Office ( ATO ) is progressively including 'debts on hold' in relevant taxpayer ATO account balances. A 'debt on hold' is an outstanding tax debt where the ATO has previously paused debt collection actions. Tax debts will generally be placed on hold where the ATO decides it is not cost effective to collect the debt at the time. The ATO is currently required by law to offset such 'debts on hold' against any refunds or credits the taxpayer is entitled to. The difficulty with these debts is that the ATO has not traditionally recorded them on taxpayer's ATO account balances. Taxpayers with 'debts on hold' of $100 or more will receive (or their tax agent will receive) a letter before it is added to their ATO account balance (which can be viewed in the ATO's online services or the statement of account). Taxpayers with a 'debt on hold' of less than $100 will not receive a letter, but the debt will be included in their ATO account balance. The ATO has advised it will remit the general interest charge ( GIC ) that is applied to 'debts on hold' for periods where they have not been included in account balances. This means that taxpayers have not been charged GIC for this period. The ATO will stop remitting GIC six months from the day the taxpayer's 'debt on hold' is included in their account balance. After this, GIC will start to apply.

Audit Lowe Down – How do we account for the costs incurred when acquiring an asset?

August 26, 2025
How do we account for the costs incurred when acquiring an asset? When we acquire an asset such as property, plant and equipment, intangibles or inventory there are often significant other costs incurred as part of the purchase process, including delivery, stamp duty, installation fees. Whether we capitalise these to the value of the asset or expense them as incurred can make a significant difference to an entity’s reported position or performance. Since we have accounting standards for specific assets, the treatment can vary depending on the asset and the relevant standard. A summary of some common expenses and their treatment under four accounting standards has been included below. The four standards considered are: AASB 102 Inventories AASB 116 Property, Plant and Equipment AASB 138 Intangible Assets AASB 140 Investment Property.
More Posts