Tax Alert - Recent changes to various Victorian state taxes

Lowe Lippmann Chartered Accountants

Recent updates for various Victorian state taxes


In recent weeks, we have seen some updates in relation to various Victorian state taxes, including:

  • Vacant Residential Land Tax – legislation received royal assent to extend the holiday home exemption to land owned by companies or trusts.
  • Payroll Tax – exemptions for certain general practitioners.
  • Commercial and Industrial Property Tax – legislation received royal assent and rules apply from 1 July 2024.


We will discuss the importance of each update in more detail.

Vacant Residential Land Tax holiday home exemption extended


The State Taxation Amendment Bill 2024 (Vic) has recently received royal assent and will amend the Land Tax Act 2005 (Vic), to extend the holiday home exemption within the Vacant Residential Land Tax (VRLT) rules to land owned by companies or trusts from 1 January 2025.


What is VRLT?


The VRLT is an annual tax imposed on residential properties in Victoria that are vacant for more than six months in a calendar year. VRLT is assessed at rate of 1.0% of the capital improved value of the land for the first year (2.0% for the second and 3.0% for the third consecutive years) and is payable to the Victorian State Revenue Office.


The catchment zone for the VRLT rules was expanded late last year (see our previous Tax Alert here) to include an owner of residential property anywhere in the State of Victoria that is vacant for more than six months between 1 January 2024 and 31 December 2024, unless an exemption applies.


An exemption applies where the owner (or a relative) has used and occupied the land as a holiday home for at least 4 weeks (whether continuous or aggregate) in the preceding land tax year ending 31 December.


What are the requirements of the holiday home exemption?


The Commissioner of State Revenue must be satisfied that the property was a genuine holiday home, having regard to its location and distance between the owner or vested beneficiary’s actual home and the holiday home, as well as the frequency and nature of its use. 


An owner or a vested beneficiary will only be able to claim one holiday home exemption in a calendar year.


The scope of the VRLT exemptions have now been extended to include land owned by a corporation or a trustee of a trust (other than a trust with a vested beneficiary) when certain requirements have been satisfied, including:

  • the owner of the land has been the owner of the land continuously since 28 November 2023, or since a later date if the owner became the owner at that date under a contract for the purchase of the land entered into on or before 28 November 2023;
  • there has been no change in beneficial ownership of the land since 28 November 2023, except for a change involving persons who are relatives of one another;
  • the minimum landholder threshold and principal place of residence (PPR) requirement must be satisfied;
  • in the year preceding the land tax year (ie. ending 31 December), the land has been used and occupied as a holiday home for a period of at least 4 weeks (whether continuous or aggregate) by a specified person; and
  • the Commissioner of State Revenue is satisfied that the land was used and occupied as a holiday home in the year preceding the tax year.


There are some important concepts we need to consider in more detail as part of these requirements.


A “change in beneficial ownership” can include changes in; shareholdings (in the case of a company), unit holdings (in the case of a unit trust), beneficial interests (in the case of a fixed trust) or specified beneficiaries (in the case of a discretionary trust). Where there has been a change, the VRLT exemption for holiday homes will only apply where the change is between persons who are relatives of one another. 


A “relative” within the meaning of the Land Tax Act 2005 (Vic) is rather narrowly defined and covers, among others, the spouse of the owner, as well as a sibling or child of either the owner or a spouse of a sibling and child.


The “minimum landholder threshold” requires a minimum ownership interest of 50.0% in the landowner (in the case of companies, unit trusts and fixed trusts) by one or more individual persons who must have used and occupied other land (ie. other than the holiday home in question) in Australia as a PPR. In other words, if a company/ unit trust/ fixed trust has a shareholder/ unitholder/ beneficiary that is a discretionary trust with a greater than 50.0% interest, then the “minimum landholder threshold” requirement can not be satisfied.


Specifically in the case of discretionary trust landholders, it requires a specified beneficiary of a discretionary trust who is a natural person or a relative of that person must have used and occupied other land in Australia as a PPR.


Does the holiday home exemption extend to contiguous land?


The exemption for holiday homes can also include separately titled residential land that is contiguous to a holiday home, in certain circumstances. To be exempt, the contiguous land must be owned by the owner of the holiday home land, it must enhance the holiday home land and must be used solely for the private benefit and enjoyment of the person who uses and occupies the holiday home land (ie. land used for a tennis court, swimming pool or garden). 


Contiguous land can be separated from the holiday home land, but only by a road or railway or other similar area where movement across or around is reasonably possible.


Why is there a stipulation for trusts “other than a trust with a vested beneficiary”?


It is not common for the holiday home exemption to apply to a vested beneficiary of a trust.  A vested beneficiary is a natural person who has a vested beneficial interest in possession in the land or is the principal beneficiary of a special disability trust.


The most common trusts that own holiday homes are likely to be discretionary or family trusts and these typically do not have property vested in a particular beneficiary.  While vesting a property in a natural person beneficiary may be possible, careful consideration is needed to avoid any adverse implications for income tax (including capital gains tax) and stamp duty implications.


What are the implications for self-managed superannuation funds?


Self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) are precluded from providing residential premises to their members or associates of the members.  Therefore, it is difficult to see how a SMSF could avail itself of the four weeks holiday home exemption. Indeed any such properties owned by a SMSF would need to be used for income producing purposes by letting out to unrelated parties on commercial terms and conditions.

Payroll Tax exemptions for certain general practitioners


The Victorian Government has announced that all Victorian general practitioner (GP) businesses will receive a retrospective exemption from any outstanding or future assessment issued for payroll tax on payments to contractor GPs for the period up to 30 June 2024.


A further 12-month exemption from payroll tax, through to 30 June 2025, will be available for any general practice business that has not already received advice and begun paying payroll tax on payments to their contractor GPs on this basis.


Also, a payroll tax exemption will be provided for payments to contractor GPs and to employee GPs for providing bulk-billed consultations from 1 July 2025.


These exemptions have been a welcomed reform to help reduce stress and pressure on Victorian clinics.


New South Wales, South Australia, Queensland, and the Australian Capital Territory have already announced amnesties or concessions, while Western Australia has confirmed it will not make payroll tax changes.

Commercial and Industrial Property Tax legislation received royal assent and rules apply from 1 July 2024


The Commercial and Industrial Property Tax Reform Bill 2024 (Vic) has now received royal assent and will establish a tax reform scheme for eligible Commercial and Industrial Property Tax (CIPT) from 1 July 2024.


Broadly, when land with a qualifying use is sold after 1 July 2024, it will transition into the new system with stamp duty payable one last time on that property.  After a transition period of 10 years starting on the date the land entered the scheme, CIPT will begin to apply to the land.


We have explained the details of the new CIPT in a previous Tax Alert – click here.


Please do not hesitate to contact your Lowe Lippmann Relationship Partner if you wish to discuss any of these matters further.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation


Tax Alert - Chalmers backs down on Superannuation reform

October 13, 2025
In response to continuing criticism and significant industry feedback, Treasurer Jim Chalmers has announced substantial revisions to the proposed Division 296 tax. The government has decided not to apply the tax to unrealised capital gains on members superannuation balances above $3 million. The removal of the proposed unrealised capital gains tax is undoubtedly a welcome change. Division 296 was initially set to take effect from 1 July 2025. The revised proposal, effective from 1 July 2026, still imposes an additional tax but now only on realised investment earnings on the portion of a super balance above $3 million at a 30 percent tax rate To recover some of the lost tax revenue, the Treasurer announced a new 40 percent tax rate on earnings for balances exceeding $10 million. It is also anticipated that both tax thresholds will be indexed in line with the Transfer Balance Cap. We will provide more details and guidance on the new proposal as they become available.

Practice Update – October 2025

October 3, 2025
ATO interest charges are no longer tax deductible – What you can do As we explained in our Practice Update for September, general interest charge ( GIC ) and shortfall interest charge ( SIC ) imposed by the ATO is no longer tax-deductible from 1 July 2025. This applies regardless of whether the underlying tax debt relates to past or future income years. With GIC currently at 11.17%, this is now one of the most expensive forms of finance in the market — and unlike in the past, you won’t get a deduction to offset the cost. For many taxpayers, this makes relying on an ATO payment plan a costly strategy. Refinancing ATO debt Businesses can sometimes refinance tax debts with a bank or other lender. Unlike GIC and SIC amounts, interest on these loans might be deductible for tax purposes, provided the borrowing is connected to business activities. While tax debts will sometimes relate to income tax or CGT liabilities, remember that interest could also be deductible where money is borrowed to pay other tax debts relating to a business, such as: GST; PAYG instalments; PAYG withholding for employees; and FBT. However, before taking any action to refinance ATO debt it is important to carefully consider whether you will be able to deduct the interest expenses or not. Individuals If you are an individual with a tax debt, the treatment of interest expenses incurred on a loan used to pay that tax debt really depends on the extent to which the tax debt arose from a business activity: Sole traders: If you are genuinely carrying on a business, interest on borrowings used to pay tax debts from that business is generally deductible. Employees or investors: If your tax debt relates to salary, wages, rental income, dividends, or other investment income, the interest is not deductible. Refinancing may still reduce overall interest costs depending on the interest rate on the new loan, but it won’t generate a tax deduction.

Audit Lowe Down – Costs incurred in acquiring / forming a business

September 9, 2025
Costs incurred in acquiring / forming a business. Further to the recent blog about capitalisation of costs when acquiring an asset, we have received a number of questions in relation to costs incurred in setting up / purchasing a business. Formation costs on establishing a business: These costs would include: Incorporation fees ASIC registration fees Legal fees Business name registration Pre-operating costs Pre-opening costs. The relevant standard for these costs is AASB 138 Intangible Assets and paragraph 69a confirms that these start-up costs are expensed when incurred. There is no identifiable asset controlled by the entity when the costs are incurred as the entity does not exist. Business acquisition costs These costs would include: Legal and accounting fees Due diligence and valuation costs Stamp duty Advisory or brokerage fees Project management costs related to the acquisition Internal costs allocated to the transaction In contrast to the asset acquisition discussed previously, AASB 3 Business Combinations requires all acquisition costs to be expensed as incurred. This means that they are not included as part of the consideration paid and therefore do not affect calculated goodwill.  Entities purchasing businesses should be aware that these costs are not able to be capitalised as they can often be substantial, and purchasers often do not expect the costs to be taken directly to the income statement
More Posts