JobKeeper 2.0 New Rules

On 15 September 2020, the legislative instrument for the new JobKeeper 2.0 rules was passed, and further guidance was released to give effect to the following changes to the JobKeeper Scheme which were announced on 21 July 2020 and 7 August 2020, including:

introduction of two Extension Periods for the JobKeeper scheme, beyond the originally planned end date of 27 September 2020, to 28 March 2021;
a two-tier payment rate system after 28 September 2020;
eligibility rules for the two payment tiers, based on the "number of hours worked" by each eligible employee, during one of the two relevant reference periods; and
a requirement to re-test a business's eligibility for the two Extension Periods (ie. the September & December 2020 quarters) based on a new actual "decline in turnover test".

Each of these new changes can be summarised in the following table:

	Extension Period 1	Extension Period 2
Relevant dates?	28 September 2020 to 3 January 2021	4 January 2021 to 28 March 2021
JobKeeper Fortnights?	Fortnights #14 to #20	Fortnights #21 to #26

New rules/tests for the Business/Employer …
New "decline in turnover test"?	The Business will need to confirm it has experienced a decline in "actual GST turnover" (and not projected turnover) for the September 2020 quarter (compared to the September 2019 quarter) …	The Business will need to confirm it has experienced a decline in "actual GST turnover" (and not projected turnover) for the December 2020 quarter (compared to the December 2019 quarter) …
Business with group aggregated turnover more than $1 bn …	.. of at least 50%	.. of at least 50%
Business with group aggregated turnover less than $1 bn …	.. of at least 30%	.. of at least 30%
Charities and ACNC entities …	.. of at least 15%	.. of at least 15%
*Note:* As a part of the new actual "decline in turnover test", the ATO Commissioner has been granted discretion that will determine most (or all) supplies will be treated as being made at a time in the period to which they are attributable for GST reporting purposes – this new discretion has been explained in more detail below the Table.

New rules/tests for Employees/ Business Participants/ Religious Practitioners …
Two-tier payment rates?	Determines the minimum wage each eligible employee, business participant or religious practitioner is paid per fortnight …

High Rate …	$1,200 per Fortnight (when Hours Worked more than 80 hours during the test period)	$1,000 per Fortnight (when Hours Worked more than 80 hours during the test period)
Low Rate …	$750 per Fortnight (when Hours Worked less than 80 hours during the test period)	$650 per Fortnight (when Hours Worked less than 80 hours during the test period)

Number of " Hours Worked "?	This test determines the Payment Rate which will apply to each eligible employee, business participant or religious practitioner during each Extension Period. When the total hours worked during the test period is; more than 80 hours the High Rate applies , and if it is less than 80 hours the Low Rate applies . *Note:* the threshold of 80 hours for the test period* is equivalent to the previous terminology used (ie. 20 hours or more on average per week for a four weeks period).*
For Employees …	The total "hours worked" by each eligible employee (including work performed, paid leave and paid absence on public holidays) in either : the 28-day period ended before 1 March 2020 ; or the 28-day period ended before 1 July 2020 .
For Eligible Business Participants ….	The total "hours actively engaged" by the eligible business participant (including work performed, undertaking specific tasks in business development, planning, regulatory compliance or similar activities) in the month of February 2020 .
For Religious Practitioners …	The total "hours spent doing activities" by the religious practitioner (including in the pursuit of their vocation by performance of the rituals or practices (ie. participation in services, prayer, contemplation or meditation) and furtherance of the objectives of the religious organisation (ie. missionary or charitable work)) in the month of February 2020 .

Wage payment due date extended for JobKeeper Fortnights #14 and #15	As explained above for Extension Period 1, the Business needs to test actual "decline in turnover" for the September 2020 quarter (and this can only be done after 30 September has passed). Consequently, the ATO has extended the "wage payment due date for these two Fortnights until 31 October 2020 , in order to meet the wage condition for all employees included in the JobKeeper scheme. *Note:* JobKeeper Fortnight #14 is from 28 September – 11 October, and Fortnight #15 is from 12 October – 25 October 2020.

We must note that while these announcements give us more guidance in relation to the JobKeeper 2.0 rules (beyond 28 September 2020), further guidance from the ATO is still expected to be released shortly.

Most importantly, we must wait to see some detailed guidance as to how the ATO will allow for alternative reference periods to be used for :

the " decline in turnover test " (where there may be no comparative information available for the September or December 2019 quarters); and

the " number of hours worked test " for determining which of the two-tier payment rates should apply to each eligible employee (where the two reference periods can not give an accurate figure for the number of hours worked, caused by circumstances out of the employee or business's control).

Clarification on calculating "actual GST turnover" for the new actual "decline in turnover test"

As the new actual "decline in turnover test" is based on the actual decline in GST turnover, rather than projected GST turnover, the ATO has been given a more specific power to ensure that the legislation can deliver the intended policy outcomes.

The ATO Commissioner may now determine that certain supplies (ie. transactions) are to be treated as being wholly (or partly) made at a particular time for the purposes of the actual decline in GST turnover test.

Currently, GST turnover is determined based on when supplies are made, not the period to which any tax payable on the supplies is attributable. However, the GST return usually contained in Business Activity Statements ( BAS ) requires reporting of supplies on the basis of attribution.

While this distinction often does not matter over the medium term, in the context of quarterly testing of current GST turnover, it could increase compliance costs for some taxpayers.

We understand that the ATO will accept that most (or all) supplies will be treated as being made at a time during the period to which they are attributable for GST reporting purposes, and this will align the turnover information reported by entities to the ATO in GST returns with how current GST turnover is calculated for the purposes of the new actual "decline in turnover test".

Please do not hesitate to contact your Lowe Lippmann Relationship Partner if you wish to discuss any of these matters further.

< Older Post

Newer Post >

Audit Lowe Down – Costs incurred in acquiring / forming a business

September 9, 2025

Costs incurred in acquiring / forming a business. Further to the recent blog about capitalisation of costs when acquiring an asset, we have received a number of questions in relation to costs incurred in setting up / purchasing a business. Formation costs on establishing a business: These costs would include: Incorporation fees ASIC registration fees Legal fees Business name registration Pre-operating costs Pre-opening costs. The relevant standard for these costs is AASB 138 Intangible Assets and paragraph 69a confirms that these start-up costs are expensed when incurred. There is no identifiable asset controlled by the entity when the costs are incurred as the entity does not exist. Business acquisition costs These costs would include: Legal and accounting fees Due diligence and valuation costs Stamp duty Advisory or brokerage fees Project management costs related to the acquisition Internal costs allocated to the transaction In contrast to the asset acquisition discussed previously, AASB 3 Business Combinations requires all acquisition costs to be expensed as incurred. This means that they are not included as part of the consideration paid and therefore do not affect calculated goodwill. Entities purchasing businesses should be aware that these costs are not able to be capitalised as they can often be substantial, and purchasers often do not expect the costs to be taken directly to the income statement

Practice Update – September 2025

September 8, 2025

ATO to include tax 'debts on hold' in taxpayer account balances From August 2025, the Australian Taxation Office ( ATO ) is progressively including 'debts on hold' in relevant taxpayer ATO account balances. A 'debt on hold' is an outstanding tax debt where the ATO has previously paused debt collection actions. Tax debts will generally be placed on hold where the ATO decides it is not cost effective to collect the debt at the time. The ATO is currently required by law to offset such 'debts on hold' against any refunds or credits the taxpayer is entitled to. The difficulty with these debts is that the ATO has not traditionally recorded them on taxpayer's ATO account balances. Taxpayers with 'debts on hold' of $100 or more will receive (or their tax agent will receive) a letter before it is added to their ATO account balance (which can be viewed in the ATO's online services or the statement of account). Taxpayers with a 'debt on hold' of less than $100 will not receive a letter, but the debt will be included in their ATO account balance. The ATO has advised it will remit the general interest charge ( GIC ) that is applied to 'debts on hold' for periods where they have not been included in account balances. This means that taxpayers have not been charged GIC for this period. The ATO will stop remitting GIC six months from the day the taxpayer's 'debt on hold' is included in their account balance. After this, GIC will start to apply.

Audit Lowe Down – How do we account for the costs incurred when acquiring an asset?

August 26, 2025

How do we account for the costs incurred when acquiring an asset? When we acquire an asset such as property, plant and equipment, intangibles or inventory there are often significant other costs incurred as part of the purchase process, including delivery, stamp duty, installation fees. Whether we capitalise these to the value of the asset or expense them as incurred can make a significant difference to an entity’s reported position or performance. Since we have accounting standards for specific assets, the treatment can vary depending on the asset and the relevant standard. A summary of some common expenses and their treatment under four accounting standards has been included below. The four standards considered are: AASB 102 Inventories AASB 116 Property, Plant and Equipment AASB 138 Intangible Assets AASB 140 Investment Property.