Audit Lowe Down – Related parties – what should I consider in identifying them?

Lowe Lippmann Chartered Accountants

Related parties – what should I consider in identifying them?

 

Related party disclosures is an area that is receiving more scrutiny from stakeholders in both the for-profit and the not-for-profit space.

 

Disclosure of transactions that have occurred with related parties are important since the terms and conditions are often different from those with unrelated parties, in some instances the transactions may have occurred for much lower or even nil consideration.

 

Often one of the biggest challenges for compiling the disclosures is working out who is a related party of an entity.

 

The definition of related parties in AASB 124 Related Party Disclosures is detailed, however we have summarised the definition into various elements below.

 

a.  Think about entities who might be related to the reporting entity i.e.:

                               i.   through control or significant influence,

                              ii.   by the existence of material transactions or

                             iii.   dependence on technical information or personnel provided by them.

 

b.   Think about people who might be related to the reporting entity, i.e.:

                               i.   Key management personnel, including all directors.

                               ii.   Close family members of key management personnel (e.g. spouse, child).

 

c.    Think about entities that the people identified in b. might control or significant influence, i.e.:

                                i.   Family businesses

                                ii.   Businesses which a close family member controls (i.e. senior partner in a legal or accounting firm).

 

Once you have identified a complete list of who is potentially a related party, analysis can then be performed to confirm they meet the criteria in AASB 124 and then identify any transactions with these parties.

 

Remember that transactions should be included whether or not a price was charged or whether the transaction was formally documented or not.



Please do not hesitate to contact your Lowe Lippmann Relationship Partner if you wish to discuss any of these matters further.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation


October 19, 2025
Further guidance on proposed changes to Division 296 from 1 July 2026 Earlier this week, we released a Tax Alert ( click here ) after the Government announced some significant changes to the proposed superannuation rules to increase the concessional tax rate from 15% to an effective 30% rate on earnings on total superannuation balances ( TSB ) over $3 million – known as Division 296. These proposed superannuation rules were set to commence on 1 July 2025, but the Government has now announced significant changes that will delay the start date until 1 July 2026 and apply to the 2026-27 financial year onwards.
October 13, 2025
In response to continuing criticism and significant industry feedback, Treasurer Jim Chalmers has announced substantial revisions to the proposed Division 296 tax. The government has decided not to apply the tax to unrealised capital gains on members superannuation balances above $3 million. The removal of the proposed unrealised capital gains tax is undoubtedly a welcome change. Division 296 was initially set to take effect from 1 July 2025. The revised proposal, effective from 1 July 2026, still imposes an additional tax but now only on realised investment earnings on the portion of a super balance above $3 million at a 30 percent tax rate To recover some of the lost tax revenue, the Treasurer announced a new 40 percent tax rate on earnings for balances exceeding $10 million. It is also anticipated that both tax thresholds will be indexed in line with the Transfer Balance Cap. We will provide more details and guidance on the new proposal as they become available.
October 3, 2025
ATO interest charges are no longer tax deductible – What you can do As we explained in our Practice Update for September, general interest charge ( GIC ) and shortfall interest charge ( SIC ) imposed by the ATO is no longer tax-deductible from 1 July 2025. This applies regardless of whether the underlying tax debt relates to past or future income years. With GIC currently at 11.17%, this is now one of the most expensive forms of finance in the market — and unlike in the past, you won’t get a deduction to offset the cost. For many taxpayers, this makes relying on an ATO payment plan a costly strategy. Refinancing ATO debt Businesses can sometimes refinance tax debts with a bank or other lender. Unlike GIC and SIC amounts, interest on these loans might be deductible for tax purposes, provided the borrowing is connected to business activities. While tax debts will sometimes relate to income tax or CGT liabilities, remember that interest could also be deductible where money is borrowed to pay other tax debts relating to a business, such as: GST; PAYG instalments; PAYG withholding for employees; and FBT. However, before taking any action to refinance ATO debt it is important to carefully consider whether you will be able to deduct the interest expenses or not. Individuals If you are an individual with a tax debt, the treatment of interest expenses incurred on a loan used to pay that tax debt really depends on the extent to which the tax debt arose from a business activity: Sole traders: If you are genuinely carrying on a business, interest on borrowings used to pay tax debts from that business is generally deductible. Employees or investors: If your tax debt relates to salary, wages, rental income, dividends, or other investment income, the interest is not deductible. Refinancing may still reduce overall interest costs depending on the interest rate on the new loan, but it won’t generate a tax deduction.
More Posts