Update to landholding valuation ruling for Victorian land holders

The Victorian State Revenue Office ( SRO ) has recently issued updated guidance in relation to the valuation rules for land holdings in Victoria, and although the updated revenue ruling was issued on 7 December 2020, will be effective from 19 June 2019 .

The updated revenue ruling includes two particular changes, as follows:

a change to the legislative definition of "land holding"; and
guidance on when the Commissioner will consider the written down book value of fixtures in the absence of formal valuation evidence.

What is a "land holding"?

The amendments to the definition of land holding are effective from 19 June 2019 and land holdings are not simply limited to interests in land, but can include interests in fixtures held separately from land and economic entitlements in land.

A land holder is any company or unit trust scheme (whether private or public) that has land holdings in Victoria with an unencumbered value of $1 million or more.

In determining whether a company or unit trust scheme is a land holder (and the amount of duty payable on a relevant acquisition), the value of its land holdings must be clearly identified. In certain circumstances, the company or unit trust scheme's land holdings may include interests in land held by linked entities and discretionary trusts, and land deemed to be owned as a result of any uncompleted agreements.

What will the Commissioner accept as "formal valuation evidence"?

The updated guidance also outlines the type of valuation evidence, and the circumstances where this may be needed, when determining whether a company or unit trust scheme is a land holder.

Generally, the Commissioner will require a taxpayer to obtain and provide a valuation from a competent valuer (i.e. either a certified practising valuer who is a member of the Australian Property Institute or a member of the Real Estate Institute of Victoria Ltd with sworn valuer accreditation) on any one or more of the company or unit trust scheme's land holdings if:

the value of the land holding, as estimated by the taxpayer, is above $1 million or is low in comparison with its municipal capital improved value (irrespective of its estimated value); or
the land holding was acquired by the company or unit trust more than 12 months before the date of the relevant acquisition (which is the date when a person acquires a significant interest in a company or unit trust landholder entity); or
the taxpayer has submitted a valuation from a competent valuer where:

the valuation provides a value for the land more than 12 months before the date of the relevant acquisition; or
the valuation provides a value for the land within 12 months of the date of the relevant acquisition but the valuation has not taken into account planning approvals or permits obtained or other improvements made to the land prior to the date of the relevant acquisition.

In specific circumstances, where a land holder has an interest in fixtures separately from the land on which they are located, or holds land on which items have been fixed by the landholder or another person, the Commissioner is willing to consider whether the written down book value of those fixtures provides a reasonable estimate of value in the absence of formal valuation evidence.

The Commissioner may accept the written down book value evidence as being reasonable if the fixtures have not been written down to a zero value and are general in nature (ie. air conditioning units in an office or display shelves in a retail store) and not bespoke or specialised items of plant and equipment.

The updated revenue ruling includes some examples in relation to the two changes explained above, and they can been seen via the VIC SRO website – click here .

Please do not hesitate to contact your Lowe Lippmann Relationship Partner if you wish to discuss any of these matters further.

< Older Post

Newer Post >

Audit Lowe Down – Related parties – what should I consider in identifying them?

July 16, 2025

Related parties – what should I consider in identifying them? Related party disclosures is an area that is receiving more scrutiny from stakeholders in both the for-profit and the not-for-profit space. Disclosure of transactions that have occurred with related parties are important since the terms and conditions are often different from those with unrelated parties, in some instances the transactions may have occurred for much lower or even nil consideration. Often one of the biggest challenges for compiling the disclosures is working out who is a related party of an entity. The definition of related parties in AASB 124 Related Party Disclosures is detailed, however we have summarised the definition into various elements below. a. Think about entities who might be related to the reporting entity i.e.: i. through control or significant influence, ii. by the existence of material transactions or iii. dependence on technical information or personnel provided by them. b. Think about people who might be related to the reporting entity, i.e.: i. Key management personnel, including all directors. ii. Close family members of key management personnel (e.g. spouse, child). c. Think about entities that the people identified in b. might control or significant influence, i.e.: i. Family businesses ii. Businesses which a close family member controls (i.e. senior partner in a legal or accounting firm). Once you have identified a complete list of who is potentially a related party, analysis can then be performed to confirm they meet the criteria in AASB 124 and then identify any transactions with these parties. Remember that transactions should be included whether or not a price was charged or whether the transaction was formally documented or not.

Practice Update – July 2025

July 4, 2025

Changes to car thresholds from 1 July The car limit for the 2026 income year is $69,674. This is the highest value that a taxpayer can use to calculate depreciation on a car where they use the car for work or business purposes and they first use or lease the car in the 2026 income year. If a taxpayer is buying a car and the price is more than the car limit, the highest input tax ( GST ) credit they can claim (except in certain circumstances) is one-eleventh of the car limit. For the 2026 income year, the highest input tax credit they can claim is $6,334 (i.e. one-eleventh of $69,674). The luxury car tax ( LCT ) threshold for the 2026 income year is $91,387 for fuel-efficient vehicles, and $80,567 for all other luxury vehicles. Input tax credits need to be claimed within the four-year time limit. A taxpayer cannot claim an input tax credit for luxury car tax when they buy a luxury car, even if they use it for business purposes.

Audit Lowe Down – Large proprietary limited – are you one? Tips and traps for your assessment

July 1, 2025

Large proprietary limited – are you one? Tips and traps for your assessment. In Australia, being classified as a large proprietary limited company means that you have to prepare, and lodge audited financial statements with ASIC under the Corporations Act 2001 (the Act), however many companies are not necessarily applying the thresholds appropriately. A proprietary company is large if it meets at least 2 of the following thresholds: Consolidated revenue ≥ $50 million Consolidated gross assets ≥ $25 million 100 or more employees. These thresholds seem simple, however some points to note: The calculations must be performed applying ALL accounting standards so even if you are preparing special purpose financial statements, then you will need to assess these thresholds as if you were applying all standards, including: AASB 16 Leases – this standard would add a right of use asset to your balance sheet potentially significantly increasing your gross assets. AASB 10 Consolidated Financial Statements – if you have controlled entities then the inclusion of their income statement and balance sheet may significantly increase each of the thresholds. AASB 128 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures / AASB 11 Joint Arrangements – if you have entities over which you have significant influence or joint control then applying equity accounting or including your share of assets and revenue would affect the thresholds. In determining the number of employees, the Act is clear that it is all full-time and part-time employees (on a pro-rata basis), however casual employees need to be considered. For example, are they genuinely casual with varying hours / shifts each week or are they in substance a permanent member of your team but just employed on a casual basis. The thresholds need to be met at the end of the financial year and therefore entities should track their performance during the year so they are aware if they will meet the definition of a large proprietary company at year end.