JobKeeper 2.0 New Rules

On 15 September 2020, the legislative instrument for the new JobKeeper 2.0 rules was passed, and further guidance was released to give effect to the following changes to the JobKeeper Scheme which were announced on 21 July 2020 and 7 August 2020, including:

introduction of two Extension Periods for the JobKeeper scheme, beyond the originally planned end date of 27 September 2020, to 28 March 2021;
a two-tier payment rate system after 28 September 2020;
eligibility rules for the two payment tiers, based on the "number of hours worked" by each eligible employee, during one of the two relevant reference periods; and
a requirement to re-test a business's eligibility for the two Extension Periods (ie. the September & December 2020 quarters) based on a new actual "decline in turnover test".

Each of these new changes can be summarised in the following table:

	Extension Period 1	Extension Period 2
Relevant dates?	28 September 2020 to 3 January 2021	4 January 2021 to 28 March 2021
JobKeeper Fortnights?	Fortnights #14 to #20	Fortnights #21 to #26

New rules/tests for the Business/Employer …
New "decline in turnover test"?	The Business will need to confirm it has experienced a decline in "actual GST turnover" (and not projected turnover) for the September 2020 quarter (compared to the September 2019 quarter) …	The Business will need to confirm it has experienced a decline in "actual GST turnover" (and not projected turnover) for the December 2020 quarter (compared to the December 2019 quarter) …
Business with group aggregated turnover more than $1 bn …	.. of at least 50%	.. of at least 50%
Business with group aggregated turnover less than $1 bn …	.. of at least 30%	.. of at least 30%
Charities and ACNC entities …	.. of at least 15%	.. of at least 15%
*Note:* As a part of the new actual "decline in turnover test", the ATO Commissioner has been granted discretion that will determine most (or all) supplies will be treated as being made at a time in the period to which they are attributable for GST reporting purposes – this new discretion has been explained in more detail below the Table.

New rules/tests for Employees/ Business Participants/ Religious Practitioners …
Two-tier payment rates?	Determines the minimum wage each eligible employee, business participant or religious practitioner is paid per fortnight …

High Rate …	$1,200 per Fortnight (when Hours Worked more than 80 hours during the test period)	$1,000 per Fortnight (when Hours Worked more than 80 hours during the test period)
Low Rate …	$750 per Fortnight (when Hours Worked less than 80 hours during the test period)	$650 per Fortnight (when Hours Worked less than 80 hours during the test period)

Number of " Hours Worked "?	This test determines the Payment Rate which will apply to each eligible employee, business participant or religious practitioner during each Extension Period. When the total hours worked during the test period is; more than 80 hours the High Rate applies , and if it is less than 80 hours the Low Rate applies . *Note:* the threshold of 80 hours for the test period* is equivalent to the previous terminology used (ie. 20 hours or more on average per week for a four weeks period).*
For Employees …	The total "hours worked" by each eligible employee (including work performed, paid leave and paid absence on public holidays) in either : the 28-day period ended before 1 March 2020 ; or the 28-day period ended before 1 July 2020 .
For Eligible Business Participants ….	The total "hours actively engaged" by the eligible business participant (including work performed, undertaking specific tasks in business development, planning, regulatory compliance or similar activities) in the month of February 2020 .
For Religious Practitioners …	The total "hours spent doing activities" by the religious practitioner (including in the pursuit of their vocation by performance of the rituals or practices (ie. participation in services, prayer, contemplation or meditation) and furtherance of the objectives of the religious organisation (ie. missionary or charitable work)) in the month of February 2020 .

Wage payment due date extended for JobKeeper Fortnights #14 and #15	As explained above for Extension Period 1, the Business needs to test actual "decline in turnover" for the September 2020 quarter (and this can only be done after 30 September has passed). Consequently, the ATO has extended the "wage payment due date for these two Fortnights until 31 October 2020 , in order to meet the wage condition for all employees included in the JobKeeper scheme. *Note:* JobKeeper Fortnight #14 is from 28 September – 11 October, and Fortnight #15 is from 12 October – 25 October 2020.

We must note that while these announcements give us more guidance in relation to the JobKeeper 2.0 rules (beyond 28 September 2020), further guidance from the ATO is still expected to be released shortly.

Most importantly, we must wait to see some detailed guidance as to how the ATO will allow for alternative reference periods to be used for :

the " decline in turnover test " (where there may be no comparative information available for the September or December 2019 quarters); and

the " number of hours worked test " for determining which of the two-tier payment rates should apply to each eligible employee (where the two reference periods can not give an accurate figure for the number of hours worked, caused by circumstances out of the employee or business's control).

Clarification on calculating "actual GST turnover" for the new actual "decline in turnover test"

As the new actual "decline in turnover test" is based on the actual decline in GST turnover, rather than projected GST turnover, the ATO has been given a more specific power to ensure that the legislation can deliver the intended policy outcomes.

The ATO Commissioner may now determine that certain supplies (ie. transactions) are to be treated as being wholly (or partly) made at a particular time for the purposes of the actual decline in GST turnover test.

Currently, GST turnover is determined based on when supplies are made, not the period to which any tax payable on the supplies is attributable. However, the GST return usually contained in Business Activity Statements ( BAS ) requires reporting of supplies on the basis of attribution.

While this distinction often does not matter over the medium term, in the context of quarterly testing of current GST turnover, it could increase compliance costs for some taxpayers.

We understand that the ATO will accept that most (or all) supplies will be treated as being made at a time during the period to which they are attributable for GST reporting purposes, and this will align the turnover information reported by entities to the ATO in GST returns with how current GST turnover is calculated for the purposes of the new actual "decline in turnover test".

Please do not hesitate to contact your Lowe Lippmann Relationship Partner if you wish to discuss any of these matters further.

< Older Post

Newer Post >

Tax Alert - New Tax Agent Obligations from 1 July 2025

July 21, 2025

New Tax Agent Obligations from 1 July 2025 From 1 July 2025, “small” firms of tax practitioners (with 100 or less employees) must ensure they are complying with the eight new Code of Professional Conduct obligations from the Tax Practitioners Board ( TPB ). These new Code obligations were introduced by the Government under the Tax Agent Services (Code of Professional Conduct) Determination 2024. The new Code obligations have already commenced for large tax practitioners (with over 100 employees) from 1 January 2025. As tax agents, Lowe Lippmann Chartered Accountants are committed to upholding our professional and regulatory obligations, including with the Tax Agent Services Act 2009 which includes the Code of Professional Conduct as regulated by the TPB.

Audit Lowe Down – Related parties – what should I consider in identifying them?

July 16, 2025

Related parties – what should I consider in identifying them? Related party disclosures is an area that is receiving more scrutiny from stakeholders in both the for-profit and the not-for-profit space. Disclosure of transactions that have occurred with related parties are important since the terms and conditions are often different from those with unrelated parties, in some instances the transactions may have occurred for much lower or even nil consideration. Often one of the biggest challenges for compiling the disclosures is working out who is a related party of an entity. The definition of related parties in AASB 124 Related Party Disclosures is detailed, however we have summarised the definition into various elements below. a. Think about entities who might be related to the reporting entity i.e.: i. through control or significant influence, ii. by the existence of material transactions or iii. dependence on technical information or personnel provided by them. b. Think about people who might be related to the reporting entity, i.e.: i. Key management personnel, including all directors. ii. Close family members of key management personnel (e.g. spouse, child). c. Think about entities that the people identified in b. might control or significant influence, i.e.: i. Family businesses ii. Businesses which a close family member controls (i.e. senior partner in a legal or accounting firm). Once you have identified a complete list of who is potentially a related party, analysis can then be performed to confirm they meet the criteria in AASB 124 and then identify any transactions with these parties. Remember that transactions should be included whether or not a price was charged or whether the transaction was formally documented or not.

Practice Update – July 2025

July 4, 2025

Changes to car thresholds from 1 July The car limit for the 2026 income year is $69,674. This is the highest value that a taxpayer can use to calculate depreciation on a car where they use the car for work or business purposes and they first use or lease the car in the 2026 income year. If a taxpayer is buying a car and the price is more than the car limit, the highest input tax ( GST ) credit they can claim (except in certain circumstances) is one-eleventh of the car limit. For the 2026 income year, the highest input tax credit they can claim is $6,334 (i.e. one-eleventh of $69,674). The luxury car tax ( LCT ) threshold for the 2026 income year is $91,387 for fuel-efficient vehicles, and $80,567 for all other luxury vehicles. Input tax credits need to be claimed within the four-year time limit. A taxpayer cannot claim an input tax credit for luxury car tax when they buy a luxury car, even if they use it for business purposes.