Practice Update – December 2024

Lowe Lippmann Chartered Accountants

Can staff celebrations attract FBT?


With the holiday season coming up, employers may be planning to celebrate with their employees.


Before they hire a restaurant or book an event, employers should make sure to work out if the benefits they provide their employees are considered entertainment-related, and therefore subject to fringe benefits tax ('FBT'). This will depend on:

  • the amount they spend on each employee;
  • when and where the celebration is held;
  • who attends — is it just employees, or are partners, clients or suppliers also invited?
  • the value and type of gifts they provide.


Employers who do provide entertainment-related fringe benefits should keep records detailing all of this information so they can calculate their taxable value.


We will be releasing a full Tax Alert on this topic next week.


Reminder of December 2024 Quarter Superannuation Guarantee (SG)


Employers are reminded that employee superannuation contributions for the quarter ending 31 December 2024 must be received by the relevant super funds by 28 January 2025. If the correct amount of SG is not paid by an employer on time, they will be liable to pay the SG charge, which includes a penalty and interest component.


The SG rate is 11.5% for the 2024-25 income year.


ATO's tips for small businesses to 'get it right'


While the ATO knows most small businesses try to report correctly, it understands that mistakes can happen. The ATO advises taxpayers that it is important to get the following 'basics' right:

  • using digital tools and business software to help track and streamline processes to increase the efficiency of their business;
  • keeping accurate and complete records, which will help taxpayers meet their tax and super obligations and make lodging easier; and
  • getting the right advice from trusted resources such as their registered tax professional or the ATO's website, which can help taxpayers navigate change and uncertainty at any stage of the business life cycle.

SMSFs cannot be used for Christmas presents!


There are very limited circumstances where taxpayers can legally access their super early, and the ATO is reminding taxpayers that "paying bills and buying Christmas presents doesn't make the list."


Generally, taxpayers can only access their super when they:

  • reach preservation age and 'retire'; or
  • turn 65 (even if they are still working).


To access their super legally before then, taxpayers must satisfy a 'condition of release'.


SMSF members who illegally access their benefits may be liable for additional income tax and administrative penalties, and they could be disqualified as a trustee.


For taxpayers who have illegally accessed their super, returning it to the fund may be considered a new contribution. Depending on their contribution caps, this may result in additional tax on excess contributions.


Taxpayers should beware of people promoting 'early access schemes' to withdraw their super early (other than by legal means). They can protect themselves from promoters of such schemes by:

  • stopping any involvement with the scheme, organisation or person who approached them;
  • not signing any documents, and not providing any of their personal details such as their tax file number; and
  • making a 'tip-off' to the ATO online or by phoning the ATO on 13 10 20.

Taxpayer's claims for various 'home business' expenses rejected


In a recent decision, the AAT rejected in full a taxpayer's claims for "several classes or categories of deductions."


For the relevant period of 1 July 2021 to 30 June 2022, the taxpayer was (according to his employer) a 'technical architect'. 


However, the taxpayer also claimed he worked from home 6am to 11pm seven days a week, 365 days of the year (as he was ‘always on call’), and his income tax return for the 2022 financial year claimed a wide range of deductions, totalling approximately $40,000.


The AAT separately considered each category of deductions claimed, and rejected each in turn.


In relation to his home office 'occupancy expenses' (eg. for home insurance, council rates, waste disposal, water rates, and repairs), the AAT noted that the 'home office' rooms (comprising floorspace occupying 31% of the dwelling’s total floor area) were not physically separate from the remainder of the dwelling, which the taxpayer shared with four other members of his family.


Home office running expenses (eg. gas, power and internet) were disallowed on the grounds that the taxpayer had "not properly established an entitlement to such deductions or otherwise appropriately apportioned them between private or work-related activities." The AAT found his 100% claim for the internet, on the basis that the other members of the household did not use the internet connection, "very difficult to accept".


In relation to plant and equipment expenses, the evidence was "largely non-existent."


In relation to consumable expenses, the AAT noted that they appeared to be for goods or services of a private or domestic nature (including medications, toilet paper, milk, tea, sugar and insect spray).


The AAT also rejected the taxpayer's claim for "payments made to his spouse for tax management, office cleaning and document management/storage", noting that the services provided were generally of a private or domestic nature, and that the rendering of invoices by the spouse "has a degree of artificiality to it".


ATO reminder about family trust elections


Taxpayers may be considering whether they should make a family trust election (FTE) for a trust, or an interposed entity election (IEE) for a trust or other entity.



Making an FTE provides access to certain tax concessions (assuming the relevant tests and conditions are satisfied), although there are important things to consider.


In particular, once the election is in effect, family trust distribution tax (FTDT) is imposed when distributions are made outside the family group of the 'specified individual'. FTDT is a 47% tax, payable by a trustee, director, or partner, as the case may be (depending on the entity).


Taxpayers should review FTEs and IEEs annually to ensure they remain appropriate. Taxpayers can only revoke or vary FTEs and IEEs in limited circumstances and subject to certain conditions.


  • Before making a distribution or annual trust resolutions, trustees should identify the members of the specified individual's family group. This will help avoid FTDT liabilities.


Please do not hesitate to contact your Lowe Lippmann Relationship Partner if you wish to discuss any of these matters further.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation


September 4, 2026
Yesterday, Treasurer Jim Chalmers released draft legislation to implement the key components of the 30% minimum trust tax on discretionary trusts announced in the Federal Budget during May 2026.
September 2, 2026
Discretionary trusts and the proposed 30% minimum tax Discretionary trusts, often referred to as family trusts, have been a popular structure for Australian families and businesses for many decades. They are commonly used to operate family businesses, hold investments and assist with succession planning. Their flexibility, together with asset protection and estate planning benefits, has made them an attractive option for many groups. In the 2026–27 Federal Budget, the Government announced a significant proposed change. From 1 July 2028 , trustees of discretionary trusts would generally be required to pay a minimum tax of 30% on the trust's taxable income . According to the Government, the proposal is intended to better align the tax paid on trust income with that paid by salary and wage earners, while reducing opportunities to split income between family members. However, the announcement has generated considerable debate. Professional bodies, business groups and tax advisers have expressed concerns that the changes could increase complexity and compliance costs for many genuine family businesses and investment structures. How the proposal is expected to work Under the proposal, the trustee would generally pay the minimum 30% tax on the trust's taxable income. Where trust income is distributed to individual beneficiaries or certain other non-corporate beneficiaries , those beneficiaries would generally receive a non-refundable tax offset recognising the tax already paid by the trustee. This is intended to reduce the risk of the same income being taxed twice, but while maintaining the impact of the 30% minimum tax rate. Importantly, the minimum tax would not apply to every trust . The Government has indicated that a number of trusts would be excluded, including fixed trusts, widely held trusts, complying superannuation funds, charitable trusts, deceased estates, special disability trusts and genuine testamentary trusts. Primary production income and certain income relating to vulnerable minors would also be excluded. The Government has also stated that more than 90% of small businesses are not expected to be affected. While that may be reassuring for some taxpayers, there are still some important issues that could affect family groups using discretionary trusts. What could this mean in practice? One area likely to receive close attention is the use of companies as beneficiaries of family trusts. Many family groups have historically distributed some trust income to a company. This can provide flexibility in managing cash flow, retaining profits within the business and funding future growth. Under the proposed rules, however, the corporate beneficiary would not receive a tax offset for the tax already paid by the trustee . In many cases this will mean that income distributed from a discretionary trust to a company would be subject to double taxation. Another practical impact of the proposed change is that some family groups may find it more difficult to fully utilise existing tax losses. While the impact will depend on each group's circumstances, the proposed minimum tax is likely to reduce some of the flexibility that currently exists when managing taxable income across a family structure within many groups. The Government has also proposed a temporary three-year rollover period, commencing from 1 July 2027, to help restructure into alternative business structures , such as companies or fixed trusts, without triggering immediate income tax or capital gains tax consequences. While this may assist some groups, restructuring is rarely straightforward. Depending on the circumstances, it might be necessary to consider things like stamp duty, loan approvals, financing arrangements, contract changes, licensing requirements and professional advice. Even relatively simple restructures can involve significant time and cost, so careful planning will be important. The rules are not yet final At this stage, the proposal remains subject to consultation . Treasury released a consultation paper in July 2026 seeking feedback on a range of design issues, including how the new rules would operate in different situations. Final legislation has not yet been introduced , meaning aspects of the proposal could still change before the rules become law. For this reason, most groups utilising discretionary trust structures should avoid making major structural decisions based solely on the announcement. Instead, it is sensible to monitor developments while considering whether existing structures are likely to remain appropriate if the proposal proceeds. What should you do now? For many families, discretionary trusts are about much more than tax. They can continue to provide valuable asset protection, succession planning and business flexibility. The proposed changes do not remove those benefits, nor do they prevent discretionary trusts from continuing to be used. However, the proposal does have the potential to change the tax outcomes for some family groups, particularly those with more complex structures or those that regularly distribute income to companies. With the proposed start date still some time away, there is an opportunity to pause and carefully understand how the changes may affect your circumstances and consider whether any planning or restructuring might be appropriate. As the legislation develops, we can help you assess the impact on your business or investment structure and determine whether any action is warranted.
August 4, 2026
Government to permanently extend $20,000 instant asset write-off The Government has recently introduced legislation that would make the $20,000 instant asset write-off permanent for small businesses (as announced in the 2026 Federal Budget). If enacted, the changes would: permanently set the instant asset write-off threshold at $20,000 (instead of $1,000) for eligible depreciating assets first used, or installed ready for use, for a taxable purpose from 1 July 2026; and permanently set the general small business pool threshold at $20,000 from 1 July 2026. The changes would also further suspend the 'lock-out rule' until 30 June 2027. This rule otherwise prevents a business that has chosen not to use the simplified depreciation rules from re-entering the regime for five years.
More Posts