Practice Update – July 2024

Lowe Lippmann Chartered Accountants

ATO's main residence exemption tips


The main residence exemption needs to be considered in a variety of situations when a taxpayer sells a property they have lived in. The ATO hopes that the following tips will help in this regard:

  • Taxpayers should consider if they have started earning income from their home (in which case they may need to get a market valuation for CGT purposes).
  • When renting out a property that was their main residence, taxpayers need to consider whether to use the 6-year absence rule when they sell their property. 
  • Taxpayers can only have one property as their main residence at a time. The only exception is the 6-month period when they move from one home to another.
  • Has the taxpayer's residency changed? If so, this may affect eligibility for the exemption.

Reminder of June 2024 Quarter Superannuation Guarantee (SG)


Employers are reminded that employee superannuation contributions for the 1 April 2024 to 30 June 2024 quarter must be received by the relevant super funds by 28 July 2024 (which is a Sunday), in order to avoid being liable to pay the SG charge.


Notice of Medicare levy exemption data-matching program


The ATO will acquire Medicare Exemption Statement data from Services Australia for the 2024 to 2026 income years, including individuals' full names, dates of birth, residential addresses, entitlement status, and approved entitlement details.


The objectives of this program are to (among other things) ensure individuals are correctly claiming an exemption from payment of the Medicare levy and Medicare levy surcharge.


Family trust elections and interposed entity elections


Family trust distribution tax (FTDT) is a special, 47%, tax sometimes payable by a trustee, director or partner. It applies when a trust has made a family trust election (FTE), or an entity has made an interposed entity election (IEE), and makes a distribution outside the 'family group' (as defined) of the specified individual in the election.


Where such an election has been made by a trustee or another entity, it is important that the original election is retained in the approved form. FTEs and IEEs can be lodged with the ATO.


Where elections are involved, taxpayers should consider the following on an annual basis:

  • if the election is needed and whether it can, and should be, revoked;
  • whether the specified individual remains the most suitable person and, if not, whether the specified individual can and should be varied; and
  • the timeframes to vary or revoke elections (noting these are limited and that, outside these periods, the elections and the specified individuals cannot be changed).


It is important to recognise who the members of the specified individual's family group are when making annual trustee resolutions, as distributions outside the family group will result in FTDT of 47%.


ATO may cancel inactive ABNs


The ATO regularly reviews, and sometimes cancels, inactive Australian Business Numbers (ABNs). The ATO may review a taxpayer's ABN if the taxpayer has not reported business activity in their tax return, or there are no signs of business activity in other lodgments or third-party information.


If the ATO thinks a taxpayer is no longer using their ABN, it will contact them by email, letter or SMS.


If the taxpayer is still running a business, the ATO will tell them what they need to do to keep their ABN. If they are no longer in business, they do not need to do anything -— the ATO will cancel their ABN.


Taxpayers who think they are still entitled to an ABN that has been cancelled need to reapply for it. If they restart their business activities, they should be able to reapply for the same ABN, provided that their business structure is not changing.


New lodgment obligation for income tax exempt organisations


Non-charitable not-for-profits (NFPs) with an active ABN, including community service organisations, need to lodge an annual NFP self-review return to notify their eligibility for income tax exemption.


To be eligible to self-assess as income tax exempt, the organisation's main purpose must be a community service purpose. Any other purpose must be incidental, ancillary or secondary.


Community service purposes are altruistic, which means the organisation must be established and operated for the wellbeing and benefit of others, and not for political or lobbying purposes.



For example, a club or association that has been set up principally to improve the welfare of the community would be regarded as a community service organisation. This would not be the case, however, if its main purpose was to advance the professional interests of its members.


Taxpayers able to apply CGT small business concessions


The Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) recently held that a trust was entitled to apply the CGT small business concessions and, therefore, it could reduce a capital gain it made down to nil.


In March 2015, a family trust entered into an agreement for the sale of its shares in a company for $3,500,000. In June 2015, the trustees of the trust passed a resolution apportioning the trust's income for that year between the four taxpayers (two brothers and their wives), and also distributing the capital gain made on the sale equally between those four taxpayers.


The determination of the trust's net income for distribution to the beneficiaries took into account the 50% CGT discount and CGT small business concessions, relying on a valuation of the shares (and underlying business) being $3,500,000.


The ATO, however, deemed the shares sold by the trust to have been disposed of for a market value of $10,640,000, based on an updated valuation report. This also meant that the trust was not entitled to the CGT small business concessions, as this valuation meant that it did not satisfy the CGT maximum net asset value (MNAV).


The ATO relied on the 'market value substitution' rule to substitute the value of $10,640,000 in place of the sale price of the shares. This meant that each taxpayer's share of the 2015 trust distribution was increased from $321,989 to $1,194,174.


In relation to the MNAV test, the AAT needed to determine whether the net value of the CGT assets of the trust (and its connected entities) exceeded $6,000,000.


The AAT preferred the approach taken by the valuers for the taxpayers, partly because they had given "more attention and consideration to this particular business and the circumstances and location in which it operates."


The AAT accordingly concluded that the total net value of the CGT assets of the trust (and connected entities) was below $6,000,000, and so the MNAV test was satisfied, and the taxpayers' objections to the amended assessments should be allowed.



Please do not hesitate to contact your Lowe Lippmann Relationship Partner if you wish to discuss any of these matters further.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation


September 4, 2026
Yesterday, Treasurer Jim Chalmers released draft legislation to implement the key components of the 30% minimum trust tax on discretionary trusts announced in the Federal Budget during May 2026.
September 2, 2026
Discretionary trusts and the proposed 30% minimum tax Discretionary trusts, often referred to as family trusts, have been a popular structure for Australian families and businesses for many decades. They are commonly used to operate family businesses, hold investments and assist with succession planning. Their flexibility, together with asset protection and estate planning benefits, has made them an attractive option for many groups. In the 2026–27 Federal Budget, the Government announced a significant proposed change. From 1 July 2028 , trustees of discretionary trusts would generally be required to pay a minimum tax of 30% on the trust's taxable income . According to the Government, the proposal is intended to better align the tax paid on trust income with that paid by salary and wage earners, while reducing opportunities to split income between family members. However, the announcement has generated considerable debate. Professional bodies, business groups and tax advisers have expressed concerns that the changes could increase complexity and compliance costs for many genuine family businesses and investment structures. How the proposal is expected to work Under the proposal, the trustee would generally pay the minimum 30% tax on the trust's taxable income. Where trust income is distributed to individual beneficiaries or certain other non-corporate beneficiaries , those beneficiaries would generally receive a non-refundable tax offset recognising the tax already paid by the trustee. This is intended to reduce the risk of the same income being taxed twice, but while maintaining the impact of the 30% minimum tax rate. Importantly, the minimum tax would not apply to every trust . The Government has indicated that a number of trusts would be excluded, including fixed trusts, widely held trusts, complying superannuation funds, charitable trusts, deceased estates, special disability trusts and genuine testamentary trusts. Primary production income and certain income relating to vulnerable minors would also be excluded. The Government has also stated that more than 90% of small businesses are not expected to be affected. While that may be reassuring for some taxpayers, there are still some important issues that could affect family groups using discretionary trusts. What could this mean in practice? One area likely to receive close attention is the use of companies as beneficiaries of family trusts. Many family groups have historically distributed some trust income to a company. This can provide flexibility in managing cash flow, retaining profits within the business and funding future growth. Under the proposed rules, however, the corporate beneficiary would not receive a tax offset for the tax already paid by the trustee . In many cases this will mean that income distributed from a discretionary trust to a company would be subject to double taxation. Another practical impact of the proposed change is that some family groups may find it more difficult to fully utilise existing tax losses. While the impact will depend on each group's circumstances, the proposed minimum tax is likely to reduce some of the flexibility that currently exists when managing taxable income across a family structure within many groups. The Government has also proposed a temporary three-year rollover period, commencing from 1 July 2027, to help restructure into alternative business structures , such as companies or fixed trusts, without triggering immediate income tax or capital gains tax consequences. While this may assist some groups, restructuring is rarely straightforward. Depending on the circumstances, it might be necessary to consider things like stamp duty, loan approvals, financing arrangements, contract changes, licensing requirements and professional advice. Even relatively simple restructures can involve significant time and cost, so careful planning will be important. The rules are not yet final At this stage, the proposal remains subject to consultation . Treasury released a consultation paper in July 2026 seeking feedback on a range of design issues, including how the new rules would operate in different situations. Final legislation has not yet been introduced , meaning aspects of the proposal could still change before the rules become law. For this reason, most groups utilising discretionary trust structures should avoid making major structural decisions based solely on the announcement. Instead, it is sensible to monitor developments while considering whether existing structures are likely to remain appropriate if the proposal proceeds. What should you do now? For many families, discretionary trusts are about much more than tax. They can continue to provide valuable asset protection, succession planning and business flexibility. The proposed changes do not remove those benefits, nor do they prevent discretionary trusts from continuing to be used. However, the proposal does have the potential to change the tax outcomes for some family groups, particularly those with more complex structures or those that regularly distribute income to companies. With the proposed start date still some time away, there is an opportunity to pause and carefully understand how the changes may affect your circumstances and consider whether any planning or restructuring might be appropriate. As the legislation develops, we can help you assess the impact on your business or investment structure and determine whether any action is warranted.
August 4, 2026
Government to permanently extend $20,000 instant asset write-off The Government has recently introduced legislation that would make the $20,000 instant asset write-off permanent for small businesses (as announced in the 2026 Federal Budget). If enacted, the changes would: permanently set the instant asset write-off threshold at $20,000 (instead of $1,000) for eligible depreciating assets first used, or installed ready for use, for a taxable purpose from 1 July 2026; and permanently set the general small business pool threshold at $20,000 from 1 July 2026. The changes would also further suspend the 'lock-out rule' until 30 June 2027. This rule otherwise prevents a business that has chosen not to use the simplified depreciation rules from re-entering the regime for five years.
More Posts