Tax Alert - Section 100A guidance now finalised

Lowe Lippmann Chartered Accountants

ATO Guidance targeting trust reimbursement agreements now finalised


The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) has recently finalised its guidance in relation to trust distributions and “reimbursement agreements”. This guidance impacts all clients with family or discretionary trusts.


The final guidance contained within Taxation Ruling TR 2022/4 Income tax: Section 100A reimbursement agreements and Practical Compliance Guideline PCG 2022/2 Section 100A reimbursement agreements – ATO compliance approach has been developed to support trustees and their advisors, who have been requesting clearer guidance to help them manage their tax obligations.


The ATO guidance has been finalised following an extended consultation period with the tax community, and recommended changes have been incorporated based on this feedback.


The ATO focus surrounding Section 100A relates to trust distributions made to beneficiaries, in order to achieve a tax advantage where the funds relating to the distributions are not paid out to a beneficiary, or are in some way reimbursed back to the trustee or other parties.


Whilst these final documents do not significantly depart from the draft versions released in March 2022, which gave rise to much debate on the ATO’s renewed focus on trust arrangements (see our previous Tax Alert here), there are some notable changes (see below) and they do provide additional examples which provide further clarity for trustees and advisers as to what trust arrangements the ATO will focus their attention on.

What are the notable changes?


The finalised guidance includes a few changes to the previous draft documents, including the abolition of the “blue zone”, an expansion of “green zone scenarios” concerning distributions, in particular providing a two-year timeframe to pay distributions and the broadening of individuals/entities to whom distributions can be made with less stringent requirements to pay.


However, it is unfortunate that the final guidance still applies retrospectively to trust entitlements that arose prior to 1 July 2022 in certain circumstances.


We note that the ATO has confirmed it will not allocate any compliance resources to review any trust arrangements entered into before 1 July 2014 which are considered to be “low risk”.


What are the next steps?


Given the potential retrospective nature of this ruling, reviews of previous income years distributions may be necessary.  Furthermore, careful consideration of the appointment of trust income for the year ending 30 June 2023 and beyond will need to be adopted.


Lowe Lippmann intends to provide further guidance on managing trust distributions by explaining the most salient issues in the new year once the full implications of these changes are fully considered.

Please do not hesitate to contact your Lowe Lippmann Relationship Partner if you wish to discuss any of these matters further.


Audit Lowe Down – Contracts often include price variations relating to bonuses / penalties / rebates – why do we need to consider these early?

July 28, 2025
Contracts often include price variations relating to bonuses / penalties / rebates – why do we need to consider these early? Many revenue streams are covered by AASB 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The core principle of this standard is ‘that an entity shall recognise revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.’ [emphasis added]. To determine what we expect to receive, all elements of the contract that are not fixed need to be reviewed. We need to review contracts for: Volume discounts Rebates Refunds Performance bonuses Penalties Price concessions Once we have identified variable consideration then we need to estimate the amount expected to be received using either: the expected amount using a probability weighted average of the likely outcomes or the most likely outcome. The method chosen is the one deemed to be the best estimate of the expected consideration, and the amounts may be updated at each reporting date. Once the consideration has been determined, the entity recognises only the revenue that is highly probable will occur – this is known as the constraint on revenue recognition. Practically, the requirements discussed above for variable consideration are relevant only where an entity satisfies the requirements for revenue recognition over time and contract crosses a reporting date.  As the estimate of the variable consideration changes, there may need to be a catch-up adjustment on previous revenue recognition for that contract.

Tax Alert - New Tax Agent Obligations from 1 July 2025

July 21, 2025
New Tax Agent Obligations from 1 July 2025 From 1 July 2025, “small” firms of tax practitioners (with 100 or less employees) must ensure they are complying with the eight new Code of Professional Conduct obligations from the Tax Practitioners Board ( TPB ). These new Code obligations were introduced by the Government under the Tax Agent Services (Code of Professional Conduct) Determination 2024. The new Code obligations have already commenced for large tax practitioners (with over 100 employees) from 1 January 2025. As tax agents, Lowe Lippmann Chartered Accountants are committed to upholding our professional and regulatory obligations, including with the Tax Agent Services Act 2009 which includes the Code of Professional Conduct as regulated by the TPB.

Audit Lowe Down – Related parties – what should I consider in identifying them?

July 16, 2025
Related parties – what should I consider in identifying them? Related party disclosures is an area that is receiving more scrutiny from stakeholders in both the for-profit and the not-for-profit space. Disclosure of transactions that have occurred with related parties are important since the terms and conditions are often different from those with unrelated parties, in some instances the transactions may have occurred for much lower or even nil consideration. Often one of the biggest challenges for compiling the disclosures is working out who is a related party of an entity. The definition of related parties in AASB 124 Related Party Disclosures is detailed, however we have summarised the definition into various elements below. a. Think about entities who might be related to the reporting entity i.e.: i. through control or significant influence, ii. by the existence of material transactions or iii. dependence on technical information or personnel provided by them. b. Think about people who might be related to the reporting entity, i.e.: i. Key management personnel, including all directors. ii. Close family members of key management personnel (e.g. spouse, child). c. Think about entities that the people identified in b. might control or significant influence, i.e.: i. Family businesses ii. Businesses which a close family member controls (i.e. senior partner in a legal or accounting firm). Once you have identified a complete list of who is potentially a related party, analysis can then be performed to confirm they meet the criteria in AASB 124 and then identify any transactions with these parties. Remember that transactions should be included whether or not a price was charged or whether the transaction was formally documented or not.
More Posts