Tax Alert - ATO appeals to High Court in the Bendel Case decision

Lowe Lippmann Chartered Accountants

ATO appeals to High Court in the Bendel Case decision


The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) has now applied to the High Court for special leave to appeal the Full Federal Court’s decision in FCT v Bendel [2025] FCAFC 15.

 

Last month, we released a Tax Alert (see here) after the Federal Court delivered their unanimous decision that an unpaid present entitlement (or UPE) owed by a discretionary trust to a corporate beneficiary is not a “loan” for Division 7A purposes.

 

The ATO has also issued an Interim Decision Impact Statement (DIS) in response to the Full Federal Court decision. A DIS provides information for taxpayers and advisers, and includes: details of the case, a brief summary of facts, issues decided by the court or tribunal, and relevant legislation and case law.

What is the ATO’s current view?


The ATO view can be summarised as follows:

  • Will continue to administer the tax rules in their current form (ie. treating UPEs as loans for Division 7A purposes) until the outcome of the appeal process is known.
  • Will hold off processing amendments, private rulings and objections relating to this issue until the appeal process is finalised.
  • Regardless of the new interpretation by the Full Federal Court, the reimbursement agreement rules in section 100A will continue to be considered, and this decision does not change the potential for exposure to Subdivision EA (ie. a trust makes a UPE to corporate beneficiary, and then the trust makes a payment or loan, to the shareholders or associates of the corporate beneficiary).

What can we do now?


Unfortunately, the way forward in the short term is unclear until we see how the appeal process moves to, and through, the High Court.


Again, there is an element of having to “wait and see” what happens next. We will continue to keep you updated on all future developments.


Please do not hesitate to contact your Lowe Lippmann Relationship Partner if you wish to discuss any of these matters further.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation


Tax Alert - New Tax Agent Obligations from 1 July 2025

July 21, 2025
New Tax Agent Obligations from 1 July 2025 From 1 July 2025, “small” firms of tax practitioners (with 100 or less employees) must ensure they are complying with the eight new Code of Professional Conduct obligations from the Tax Practitioners Board ( TPB ). These new Code obligations were introduced by the Government under the Tax Agent Services (Code of Professional Conduct) Determination 2024. The new Code obligations have already commenced for large tax practitioners (with over 100 employees) from 1 January 2025. As tax agents, Lowe Lippmann Chartered Accountants are committed to upholding our professional and regulatory obligations, including with the Tax Agent Services Act 2009 which includes the Code of Professional Conduct as regulated by the TPB.

Audit Lowe Down – Related parties – what should I consider in identifying them?

July 16, 2025
Related parties – what should I consider in identifying them? Related party disclosures is an area that is receiving more scrutiny from stakeholders in both the for-profit and the not-for-profit space. Disclosure of transactions that have occurred with related parties are important since the terms and conditions are often different from those with unrelated parties, in some instances the transactions may have occurred for much lower or even nil consideration. Often one of the biggest challenges for compiling the disclosures is working out who is a related party of an entity. The definition of related parties in AASB 124 Related Party Disclosures is detailed, however we have summarised the definition into various elements below. a. Think about entities who might be related to the reporting entity i.e.: i. through control or significant influence, ii. by the existence of material transactions or iii. dependence on technical information or personnel provided by them. b. Think about people who might be related to the reporting entity, i.e.: i. Key management personnel, including all directors. ii. Close family members of key management personnel (e.g. spouse, child). c. Think about entities that the people identified in b. might control or significant influence, i.e.: i. Family businesses ii. Businesses which a close family member controls (i.e. senior partner in a legal or accounting firm). Once you have identified a complete list of who is potentially a related party, analysis can then be performed to confirm they meet the criteria in AASB 124 and then identify any transactions with these parties. Remember that transactions should be included whether or not a price was charged or whether the transaction was formally documented or not.

Practice Update – July 2025

July 4, 2025
Changes to car thresholds from 1 July The car limit for the 2026 income year is $69,674. This is the highest value that a taxpayer can use to calculate depreciation on a car where they use the car for work or business purposes and they first use or lease the car in the 2026 income year. If a taxpayer is buying a car and the price is more than the car limit, the highest input tax ( GST ) credit they can claim (except in certain circumstances) is one-eleventh of the car limit. For the 2026 income year, the highest input tax credit they can claim is $6,334 (i.e. one-eleventh of $69,674). The luxury car tax ( LCT ) threshold for the 2026 income year is $91,387 for fuel-efficient vehicles, and $80,567 for all other luxury vehicles. Input tax credits need to be claimed within the four-year time limit. A taxpayer cannot claim an input tax credit for luxury car tax when they buy a luxury car, even if they use it for business purposes.
More Posts