Tax Alert - Vic Land Tax exemption for leasing land in primary production business

Lowe Lippmann Chartered Accountants

Vic Land Tax exemption for leasing land in primary production business


The Victorian Supreme Court has allowed a taxpayer’s successful appeal from a decision of the VCAT and found that it was entitled to an exemption from land tax under section 67 of the Land Tax Act 2005 (Vic) on the basis that the land was used by the taxpayer primarily production land.

 

Section 67 provides an exemption for land located wholly or partly in greater Melbourne, that is wholly or partly in an urban zone, where the Commissioner determines that land held by the trustee of a discretionary trust is used solely or primarily for a business of primary production.

 

The taxpayer, the corporate trustee of a discretionary family trust, was assessed in the 2018 and 2019 land tax years for land tax on the land, which it leased to a Partnership made up of some of the family members.

 

In determining the principal business of the taxpayer, at the Tribunal level (leading to the Supreme Court decision) there was a comparison of the gross income, labour employed, and capital employed in each respective business.

 

The Tribunal found that Mr. M (the key individual involved in the activities on the land, a director of the corporate trustee and one of the partners in the Partnership) undertook the majority of the taxpayer’s cattle farming activity himself and was ordinarily engaged in the business of breeding cattle for sale in a substantially full-time capacity.

 

The Supreme Court considered that the rental payments made to the taxpayer were simply the mechanism for allocating revenue from the sale of cattle to the taxpayer (including that the taxpayer was also engaged in the relevant activities).

 

As such, this resulted in the Supreme Court finding that the taxpayer was “carrying on one integrated primary production business” and the rent received by the taxpayer from the Partnership arose from the taxpayer’s primary production business.  The fact that the taxpayer and the Partnership held separate identities did not take away from this conclusion.

 

The Supreme Court also noted that the lease arrangement “was merely instrument designed to allocate revenue from primary production cattle business on land to the taxpayer”.



Please do not hesitate to contact your Lowe Lippmann Relationship Partner if you wish to discuss any of these matters further.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation


August 6, 2025
Paid parental leave changes have now commenced As from 1 July 2025, the amount of Paid Parental Leave available to families increased to 24 weeks, and the amount of Paid Parental Leave that parents can take off at the same time has also increased from two weeks to four weeks. Superannuation will now also be paid on Government Paid Parental Leave from 1 July 2025, at the new super guarantee rate of 12%, paid as a contribution to their nominated superannuation fund. Parents will also benefit from an increase in the weekly payment rate of Paid Parental Leave, increasing from $915.80 to $948.10 (in line with the increase to the National Minimum wage). This means a total increase of $775.20 over the 24-week entitlement.
July 28, 2025
Contracts often include price variations relating to bonuses / penalties / rebates – why do we need to consider these early? Many revenue streams are covered by AASB 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The core principle of this standard is ‘that an entity shall recognise revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.’ [emphasis added]. To determine what we expect to receive, all elements of the contract that are not fixed need to be reviewed. We need to review contracts for: Volume discounts Rebates Refunds Performance bonuses Penalties Price concessions Once we have identified variable consideration then we need to estimate the amount expected to be received using either: the expected amount using a probability weighted average of the likely outcomes or the most likely outcome. The method chosen is the one deemed to be the best estimate of the expected consideration, and the amounts may be updated at each reporting date. Once the consideration has been determined, the entity recognises only the revenue that is highly probable will occur – this is known as the constraint on revenue recognition. Practically, the requirements discussed above for variable consideration are relevant only where an entity satisfies the requirements for revenue recognition over time and contract crosses a reporting date.  As the estimate of the variable consideration changes, there may need to be a catch-up adjustment on previous revenue recognition for that contract.
July 21, 2025
New Tax Agent Obligations from 1 July 2025 From 1 July 2025, “small” firms of tax practitioners (with 100 or less employees) must ensure they are complying with the eight new Code of Professional Conduct obligations from the Tax Practitioners Board ( TPB ). These new Code obligations were introduced by the Government under the Tax Agent Services (Code of Professional Conduct) Determination 2024. The new Code obligations have already commenced for large tax practitioners (with over 100 employees) from 1 January 2025. As tax agents, Lowe Lippmann Chartered Accountants are committed to upholding our professional and regulatory obligations, including with the Tax Agent Services Act 2009 which includes the Code of Professional Conduct as regulated by the TPB.
More Posts