Practice Update – September 2024

Lowe Lippmann Chartered Accountants

Taxpayers can start lodging their tax returns


With millions of pieces of information now pre-filled (including information from most banks, employers, government agencies and private health insurers), the ATO is giving taxpayers with simple affairs the 'green light' to lodge their tax returns.


Taxpayers who plan to claim deductions this year should make sure they have the correct records, and, in most cases, "a bank or credit card statement (on its own) isn’t enough evidence to support a work-related deduction claim – you’ll need your receipts".


The ATO reminds taxpayers that the rules regarding how and when they can claim a deduction can change, including in relation to car expenses and working from home costs. Therefore, they should not just 'copy and paste' their deductions from last year, and they may require assistance from their accountant in this regard.


The ATO notes that taxpayers using a registered tax agent normally have more time to lodge..


Business self-review checklist: GST classification of products


GST classification errors can lead to significant under-reporting of GST for some taxpayers.


The ATO recently issued guidance for small to medium businesses on self-reviewing GST classification of food and health products (see ATO guide here).


The use of this guide is not mandatory, although the ATO encourages small to medium businesses to regularly self-review the GST classification of supplies, and adopt better practice processes and controls as listed in the accompanying checklist.


The checklist provides practical, step-by-step guidance for entities to:

  • self-review the GST classification of their supplies (products they import, purchase as stock or produce for sale); and
  • assess the robustness of their business systems, processes and controls that directly impact their GST classification systems.


Small business food retailers with turnover of $2 million or less may use one of the 'GST simplified accounting methods' to account for GST instead.


Receiving payments or assets from foreign trusts


Additional tax liabilities may arise when money or assets of a foreign trust are paid to a taxpayer or applied for their benefit, and they are a beneficiary of the foreign trust. These can include:

  • loans to them by the trustee directly or indirectly through another entity;
  • amounts paid by the trustee to a third party on their behalf;
  • amounts that are described as gifts from family members, but are sourced from the trust; and
  • distributions paid to them or trust assets (such as shares) transferred to them by the trustee.


Taxpayers who receive money from a foreign trust may need to ask further questions to determine whether the amount must be included in their assessable income, including:

  • whether they are a beneficiary of the foreign trust;
  • where the foreign trust obtained the money; and
  • why the money was paid to them, for example, is it a payment for services, a gift, a distribution or a loan.

Storing correct records for work-related expenses


Taxpayers need to consider what work-related expenses they will be looking to claim in the new financial year, and what records they will need to substantiate those deductions. 


Records can be kept as a paper version, an electronic copy, or a 'true and clear' photo of an original record.


Working from home deductions


Taxpayers can use two different methods to calculate their working from home deductions, and they each have different requirements:

  • With the fixed rate method, taxpayers will need a record of the actual number of hours they worked from home for the whole financial year, and at least one record for each of the additional running expenses they incurred that the rate includes (e.g., an electricity bill). 
  • To use the actual cost method, taxpayers must also keep records for any additional running expenses they incurred, and the depreciating assets they bought and used while working from home, and show how they apportioned work-related use for their expenses and depreciating assets.

Tax incentives for early stage investors


The ATO is reminding investors who purchased new shares in a qualifying 'early stage innovation company' (ESIC) that they may be eligible for tax incentives.


These tax incentives provide eligible investors who purchase new shares in an ESIC with:

  • a non-refundable carry forward tax offset equal to 20% of the amount paid for their eligible investments – this is capped at a maximum tax offset amount of $200,000 for the investor and their affiliates combined in each income year; and
  • modified capital gains tax (CGT) treatment, under which capital gains on qualifying shares that are continuously held for at least 12 months and less than 10 years may be disregarded – capital losses on shares held less than 10 years must be disregarded.


The maximum tax offset cap of $200,000 does not limit the shares that qualify for the modified CGT treatment.


Penalties imposed on taxpayer who falsely amended tax returns


The Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) recently affirmed the ATO's decision to impose shortfall penalties on a taxpayer who had lodged false amended income tax returns.


The taxpayer had lodged income tax returns for the 2020 and 2021 income years through her tax agent. The taxpayer subsequently lodged amended returns to claim deductions regarding a non-existent family trust for those years. 


She did not consult her tax agent before doing so.


Following an audit, the ATO advised the taxpayer that she had no entitlement to the deductions claimed, and it imposed shortfall and administrative penalties.


The AAT concluded that the conduct of the taxpayer was reckless, and in lodging her amended tax returns without the knowledge of her tax agent, the taxpayer had not taken reasonable care. The AAT accordingly affirmed the ATO's decision to impose shortfall and administrative penalties on the taxpayer.



Please do not hesitate to contact your Lowe Lippmann Relationship Partner if you wish to discuss any of these matters further.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation


September 2, 2026
Discretionary trusts and the proposed 30% minimum tax Discretionary trusts, often referred to as family trusts, have been a popular structure for Australian families and businesses for many decades. They are commonly used to operate family businesses, hold investments and assist with succession planning. Their flexibility, together with asset protection and estate planning benefits, has made them an attractive option for many groups. In the 2026–27 Federal Budget, the Government announced a significant proposed change. From 1 July 2028 , trustees of discretionary trusts would generally be required to pay a minimum tax of 30% on the trust's taxable income . According to the Government, the proposal is intended to better align the tax paid on trust income with that paid by salary and wage earners, while reducing opportunities to split income between family members. However, the announcement has generated considerable debate. Professional bodies, business groups and tax advisers have expressed concerns that the changes could increase complexity and compliance costs for many genuine family businesses and investment structures. How the proposal is expected to work Under the proposal, the trustee would generally pay the minimum 30% tax on the trust's taxable income. Where trust income is distributed to individual beneficiaries or certain other non-corporate beneficiaries , those beneficiaries would generally receive a non-refundable tax offset recognising the tax already paid by the trustee. This is intended to reduce the risk of the same income being taxed twice, but while maintaining the impact of the 30% minimum tax rate. Importantly, the minimum tax would not apply to every trust . The Government has indicated that a number of trusts would be excluded, including fixed trusts, widely held trusts, complying superannuation funds, charitable trusts, deceased estates, special disability trusts and genuine testamentary trusts. Primary production income and certain income relating to vulnerable minors would also be excluded. The Government has also stated that more than 90% of small businesses are not expected to be affected. While that may be reassuring for some taxpayers, there are still some important issues that could affect family groups using discretionary trusts. What could this mean in practice? One area likely to receive close attention is the use of companies as beneficiaries of family trusts. Many family groups have historically distributed some trust income to a company. This can provide flexibility in managing cash flow, retaining profits within the business and funding future growth. Under the proposed rules, however, the corporate beneficiary would not receive a tax offset for the tax already paid by the trustee . In many cases this will mean that income distributed from a discretionary trust to a company would be subject to double taxation. Another practical impact of the proposed change is that some family groups may find it more difficult to fully utilise existing tax losses. While the impact will depend on each group's circumstances, the proposed minimum tax is likely to reduce some of the flexibility that currently exists when managing taxable income across a family structure within many groups. The Government has also proposed a temporary three-year rollover period, commencing from 1 July 2027, to help restructure into alternative business structures , such as companies or fixed trusts, without triggering immediate income tax or capital gains tax consequences. While this may assist some groups, restructuring is rarely straightforward. Depending on the circumstances, it might be necessary to consider things like stamp duty, loan approvals, financing arrangements, contract changes, licensing requirements and professional advice. Even relatively simple restructures can involve significant time and cost, so careful planning will be important. The rules are not yet final At this stage, the proposal remains subject to consultation . Treasury released a consultation paper in July 2026 seeking feedback on a range of design issues, including how the new rules would operate in different situations. Final legislation has not yet been introduced , meaning aspects of the proposal could still change before the rules become law. For this reason, most groups utilising discretionary trust structures should avoid making major structural decisions based solely on the announcement. Instead, it is sensible to monitor developments while considering whether existing structures are likely to remain appropriate if the proposal proceeds. What should you do now? For many families, discretionary trusts are about much more than tax. They can continue to provide valuable asset protection, succession planning and business flexibility. The proposed changes do not remove those benefits, nor do they prevent discretionary trusts from continuing to be used. However, the proposal does have the potential to change the tax outcomes for some family groups, particularly those with more complex structures or those that regularly distribute income to companies. With the proposed start date still some time away, there is an opportunity to pause and carefully understand how the changes may affect your circumstances and consider whether any planning or restructuring might be appropriate. As the legislation develops, we can help you assess the impact on your business or investment structure and determine whether any action is warranted.
August 4, 2026
Government to permanently extend $20,000 instant asset write-off The Government has recently introduced legislation that would make the $20,000 instant asset write-off permanent for small businesses (as announced in the 2026 Federal Budget). If enacted, the changes would: permanently set the instant asset write-off threshold at $20,000 (instead of $1,000) for eligible depreciating assets first used, or installed ready for use, for a taxable purpose from 1 July 2026; and permanently set the general small business pool threshold at $20,000 from 1 July 2026. The changes would also further suspend the 'lock-out rule' until 30 June 2027. This rule otherwise prevents a business that has chosen not to use the simplified depreciation rules from re-entering the regime for five years.
July 7, 2026
High Court decision and ATO statement on Bendel’s Case The High Court recently handed down its decision in Bendel’s Case, confirming that an unpaid present entitlement (or UPE) between a discretionary trust and a beneficiary company does not fall within the extended definition of a “loan” for Division 7A purposes. The Australian Taxation Office released a Decision Impact Statement in response to the High Court findings, concluding the High Court's reasoning makes it clear that where a beneficiary company is entitled to a share of trust income that remains unpaid (a UPE) and the company takes no positive actions to call for payment of the entitlement, this will not fall within the expanded definition of a "loan" for Division 7A purposes. This is in contradiction to the ATO’s historical position that treated UPEs as "loans".
More Posts