Tax Alert - Reminder of changes to Victorian land tax exemption for principal place of residence

Lowe Lippmann Chartered Accountants

Reminder of changes to Victorian land tax exemption for principal place of residence


It is always important to carefully consider if changing the use of your principal place of residence (PPR) may impact your eligibility to the exemption from land tax in Victoria.


In Victoria, a PPR exemption from land tax may continue or be granted where the individual owner (or vested beneficiary) is temporarily absent from their PPR. This may include examples such as working interstate or overseas.


For this exemption to apply for a (land tax) assessment year, the owner (or vested beneficiary) must have either obtained a PPR exemption or used the property as their PPR for at least six consecutive months immediately before the absence and satisfy the Victorian State Revenue Office (SRO) that:

  • the absence is only temporary;
  • the individual owner (or vested beneficiary) intends to resume occupation of the PPR after their temporary absence;
  • no other land in Australia is being treated as their exempt PPR during their temporary absence; and
  • the no income requirement is satisfied.

The no income requirement


The no income requirement means the PPR exemption does not apply to a tax year if any income was derived from the land in the year preceding the tax year.


For the 2021 tax year, there was a transitional arrangement whereby the owner or trustee could still qualify for the temporary absence PPR exemption if they rented the land for six months or less in 2020.

The rental requirement


Prior to the 2021 tax year, a rental requirement preceded the no income requirement.


The rental requirement was satisfied if the owner (or trustee) did not rent out the land for six months or more in the year before the assessment year during the period of absence.


We note that land tax is assessed on a calendar year basis at midnight on 31 December before your assessment is issued. For example, the land you own at midnight on 31 December 2022 is used to calculate land tax in 2023 (ie. between 1 January and 31 December 2023).


Clearly the rental requirement is not satisfied, and the PPR exemption is not available if the individual owner (or trustee) rents out the land for six months or more in the year before the tax year.

With easy access to platforms such as AirBNB, making a PPR available for rent during times when the property is temporarily vacant can be a consideration for some owners, in particular when they are overseas for a period of time for work or holidays. 


However, it is important to remind ourselves that deriving any income from your PPR after 1 January 2022 can fail the no income requirement and your PPR exemption from land tax in Victoria could be lost.

Please do not hesitate to contact your Lowe Lippmann Relationship Partner if you wish to discuss any of these matters further.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation

Tax Alert - Chalmers backs down on Superannuation reform

October 13, 2025
In response to continuing criticism and significant industry feedback, Treasurer Jim Chalmers has announced substantial revisions to the proposed Division 296 tax. The government has decided not to apply the tax to unrealised capital gains on members superannuation balances above $3 million. The removal of the proposed unrealised capital gains tax is undoubtedly a welcome change. Division 296 was initially set to take effect from 1 July 2025. The revised proposal, effective from 1 July 2026, still imposes an additional tax but now only on realised investment earnings on the portion of a super balance above $3 million at a 30 percent tax rate To recover some of the lost tax revenue, the Treasurer announced a new 40 percent tax rate on earnings for balances exceeding $10 million. It is also anticipated that both tax thresholds will be indexed in line with the Transfer Balance Cap. We will provide more details and guidance on the new proposal as they become available.

Practice Update – October 2025

October 3, 2025
ATO interest charges are no longer tax deductible – What you can do As we explained in our Practice Update for September, general interest charge ( GIC ) and shortfall interest charge ( SIC ) imposed by the ATO is no longer tax-deductible from 1 July 2025. This applies regardless of whether the underlying tax debt relates to past or future income years. With GIC currently at 11.17%, this is now one of the most expensive forms of finance in the market — and unlike in the past, you won’t get a deduction to offset the cost. For many taxpayers, this makes relying on an ATO payment plan a costly strategy. Refinancing ATO debt Businesses can sometimes refinance tax debts with a bank or other lender. Unlike GIC and SIC amounts, interest on these loans might be deductible for tax purposes, provided the borrowing is connected to business activities. While tax debts will sometimes relate to income tax or CGT liabilities, remember that interest could also be deductible where money is borrowed to pay other tax debts relating to a business, such as: GST; PAYG instalments; PAYG withholding for employees; and FBT. However, before taking any action to refinance ATO debt it is important to carefully consider whether you will be able to deduct the interest expenses or not. Individuals If you are an individual with a tax debt, the treatment of interest expenses incurred on a loan used to pay that tax debt really depends on the extent to which the tax debt arose from a business activity: Sole traders: If you are genuinely carrying on a business, interest on borrowings used to pay tax debts from that business is generally deductible. Employees or investors: If your tax debt relates to salary, wages, rental income, dividends, or other investment income, the interest is not deductible. Refinancing may still reduce overall interest costs depending on the interest rate on the new loan, but it won’t generate a tax deduction.

Audit Lowe Down – Costs incurred in acquiring / forming a business

September 9, 2025
Costs incurred in acquiring / forming a business. Further to the recent blog about capitalisation of costs when acquiring an asset, we have received a number of questions in relation to costs incurred in setting up / purchasing a business. Formation costs on establishing a business: These costs would include: Incorporation fees ASIC registration fees Legal fees Business name registration Pre-operating costs Pre-opening costs. The relevant standard for these costs is AASB 138 Intangible Assets and paragraph 69a confirms that these start-up costs are expensed when incurred. There is no identifiable asset controlled by the entity when the costs are incurred as the entity does not exist. Business acquisition costs These costs would include: Legal and accounting fees Due diligence and valuation costs Stamp duty Advisory or brokerage fees Project management costs related to the acquisition Internal costs allocated to the transaction In contrast to the asset acquisition discussed previously, AASB 3 Business Combinations requires all acquisition costs to be expensed as incurred. This means that they are not included as part of the consideration paid and therefore do not affect calculated goodwill.  Entities purchasing businesses should be aware that these costs are not able to be capitalised as they can often be substantial, and purchasers often do not expect the costs to be taken directly to the income statement
More Posts